Nodes, Edges, and Artistic Wedges: A Survey on Network Visualization in Art History

IF 2.9 4区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
Michaela Tuscher, Velitchko Filipov, Teresa Kamencek, Raphael Rosenberg, Silvia Miksch
{"title":"Nodes, Edges, and Artistic Wedges: A Survey on Network Visualization in Art History","authors":"Michaela Tuscher,&nbsp;Velitchko Filipov,&nbsp;Teresa Kamencek,&nbsp;Raphael Rosenberg,&nbsp;Silvia Miksch","doi":"10.1111/cgf.70154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Art history traditionally relies on qualitative methods. However, the increasing availability of digitized archives has opened new possibilities for research by integrating visual analytics. This survey presents a comprehensive review of the intersection between art history and visual analytics, focusing on network visualization and how it supports researchers in analyzing and understanding complex art historical relationships through <b>nodes</b> (e.g., artists, artworks, institutions) and <b>edges</b> (the relationships between them). We explore how these approaches enable dynamic analysis, offering novel perspectives on artistic influence, stylistic evolution, and social interactions within the art world. Through this, we also examine <b>wedges</b>, a metaphor for the friction often present in art history between individuals and institutions. These tensions, which have historically played a pivotal role in shaping artistic movements, are now better understood through the lens of network visualization, revealing how conflicts and power dynamics influenced the development of art. Through a hierarchical categorization of the literature, we outline saturated problems and research areas as well as ongoing challenges in art historical research. Furthermore, we highlight the potential of visual analytics to bridge the gap between traditional qualitative research and modern computational analysis, offering interactive exploration, temporal analysis, and complex network visualization. We provide a structured foundation for future research in art history, emphasizing the value of network visualization in enriching the understanding of art history.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10687,"journal":{"name":"Computer Graphics Forum","volume":"44 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cgf.70154","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Graphics Forum","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cgf.70154","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Art history traditionally relies on qualitative methods. However, the increasing availability of digitized archives has opened new possibilities for research by integrating visual analytics. This survey presents a comprehensive review of the intersection between art history and visual analytics, focusing on network visualization and how it supports researchers in analyzing and understanding complex art historical relationships through nodes (e.g., artists, artworks, institutions) and edges (the relationships between them). We explore how these approaches enable dynamic analysis, offering novel perspectives on artistic influence, stylistic evolution, and social interactions within the art world. Through this, we also examine wedges, a metaphor for the friction often present in art history between individuals and institutions. These tensions, which have historically played a pivotal role in shaping artistic movements, are now better understood through the lens of network visualization, revealing how conflicts and power dynamics influenced the development of art. Through a hierarchical categorization of the literature, we outline saturated problems and research areas as well as ongoing challenges in art historical research. Furthermore, we highlight the potential of visual analytics to bridge the gap between traditional qualitative research and modern computational analysis, offering interactive exploration, temporal analysis, and complex network visualization. We provide a structured foundation for future research in art history, emphasizing the value of network visualization in enriching the understanding of art history.

Abstract Image

节点、边缘与艺术楔子:艺术史中的网络可视化研究
艺术史传统上依赖于定性方法。然而,越来越多的数字化档案的可用性为整合视觉分析的研究开辟了新的可能性。本调查全面回顾了艺术史与视觉分析之间的交集,重点关注网络可视化,以及它如何通过节点(例如艺术家、艺术品、机构)和边缘(它们之间的关系)支持研究人员分析和理解复杂的艺术史关系。我们将探讨这些方法如何实现动态分析,为艺术影响、风格演变和艺术界的社会互动提供新的视角。通过这一点,我们也研究了楔子,这是艺术史上个人和机构之间经常出现的摩擦的隐喻。这些历史上在塑造艺术运动中发挥关键作用的紧张关系,现在通过网络可视化的镜头得到了更好的理解,揭示了冲突和权力动态如何影响艺术的发展。通过对文献的分层分类,我们概述了艺术史研究中饱和的问题和研究领域以及正在面临的挑战。此外,我们强调可视化分析的潜力,以弥合传统定性研究和现代计算分析之间的差距,提供交互式探索,时间分析和复杂的网络可视化。我们为未来的艺术史研究提供了一个结构化的基础,强调网络可视化在丰富艺术史理解方面的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computer Graphics Forum
Computer Graphics Forum 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
12.00%
发文量
175
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Computer Graphics Forum is the official journal of Eurographics, published in cooperation with Wiley-Blackwell, and is a unique, international source of information for computer graphics professionals interested in graphics developments worldwide. It is now one of the leading journals for researchers, developers and users of computer graphics in both commercial and academic environments. The journal reports on the latest developments in the field throughout the world and covers all aspects of the theory, practice and application of computer graphics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信