VISLIX: An XAI Framework for Validating Vision Models with Slice Discovery and Analysis

IF 2.9 4区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
Xinyuan Yan, Xiwei Xuan, Jorge Piazentin Ono, Jiajing Guo, Vikram Mohanty, Shekar Arvind Kumar, Liang Gou, Bei Wang, Liu Ren
{"title":"VISLIX: An XAI Framework for Validating Vision Models with Slice Discovery and Analysis","authors":"Xinyuan Yan,&nbsp;Xiwei Xuan,&nbsp;Jorge Piazentin Ono,&nbsp;Jiajing Guo,&nbsp;Vikram Mohanty,&nbsp;Shekar Arvind Kumar,&nbsp;Liang Gou,&nbsp;Bei Wang,&nbsp;Liu Ren","doi":"10.1111/cgf.70125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Real-world machine learning models require rigorous evaluation before deployment, especially in safety-critical domains like autonomous driving and surveillance. The evaluation of machine learning models often focuses on data slices, which are subsets of the data that share a set of characteristics. Data slice finding automatically identifies conditions or data subgroups where models underperform, aiding developers in mitigating performance issues. Despite its popularity and effectiveness, data slicing for vision model validation faces several challenges. First, data slicing often needs additional image metadata or visual concepts, and falls short in certain computer vision tasks, such as object detection. Second, understanding data slices is a labor-intensive and mentally demanding process that heavily relies on the expert's domain knowledge. Third, data slicing lacks a human-in-the-loop solution that allows experts to form hypothesis and test them interactively. To overcome these limitations and better support the machine learning operations lifecycle, we introduce <i>VISLIX</i>, a novel visual analytics framework that employs state-of-the-art foundation models to help domain experts analyze slices in computer vision models. Our approach does not require image metadata or visual concepts, automatically generates natural language insights, and allows users to test data slice hypothesis interactively. We evaluate <i>VISLIX</i> with an expert study and three use cases, that demonstrate the effectiveness of our tool in providing comprehensive insights for validating object detection models.</p>","PeriodicalId":10687,"journal":{"name":"Computer Graphics Forum","volume":"44 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Graphics Forum","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cgf.70125","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Real-world machine learning models require rigorous evaluation before deployment, especially in safety-critical domains like autonomous driving and surveillance. The evaluation of machine learning models often focuses on data slices, which are subsets of the data that share a set of characteristics. Data slice finding automatically identifies conditions or data subgroups where models underperform, aiding developers in mitigating performance issues. Despite its popularity and effectiveness, data slicing for vision model validation faces several challenges. First, data slicing often needs additional image metadata or visual concepts, and falls short in certain computer vision tasks, such as object detection. Second, understanding data slices is a labor-intensive and mentally demanding process that heavily relies on the expert's domain knowledge. Third, data slicing lacks a human-in-the-loop solution that allows experts to form hypothesis and test them interactively. To overcome these limitations and better support the machine learning operations lifecycle, we introduce VISLIX, a novel visual analytics framework that employs state-of-the-art foundation models to help domain experts analyze slices in computer vision models. Our approach does not require image metadata or visual concepts, automatically generates natural language insights, and allows users to test data slice hypothesis interactively. We evaluate VISLIX with an expert study and three use cases, that demonstrate the effectiveness of our tool in providing comprehensive insights for validating object detection models.

用切片发现和分析验证视觉模型的XAI框架
现实世界的机器学习模型在部署前需要进行严格的评估,尤其是在自动驾驶和监控等安全关键领域。机器学习模型的评估通常侧重于数据切片,数据切片是共享一组特征的数据子集。数据片查找自动识别模型表现不佳的条件或数据子组,帮助开发人员减轻性能问题。尽管数据切片在视觉模型验证中的应用非常广泛和有效,但它仍然面临着一些挑战。首先,数据切片通常需要额外的图像元数据或视觉概念,并且在某些计算机视觉任务中不足,例如物体检测。其次,理解数据切片是一个劳动密集型和脑力要求很高的过程,严重依赖于专家的领域知识。第三,数据切片缺乏人在循环的解决方案,使专家能够形成假设并交互式地对其进行测试。为了克服这些限制并更好地支持机器学习操作生命周期,我们引入了VISLIX,这是一种新颖的视觉分析框架,它采用最先进的基础模型来帮助领域专家分析计算机视觉模型中的切片。我们的方法不需要图像元数据或视觉概念,自动生成自然语言洞察力,并允许用户交互式地测试数据切片假设。我们通过专家研究和三个用例来评估VISLIX,这些用例证明了我们的工具在为验证目标检测模型提供全面见解方面的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computer Graphics Forum
Computer Graphics Forum 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
12.00%
发文量
175
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Computer Graphics Forum is the official journal of Eurographics, published in cooperation with Wiley-Blackwell, and is a unique, international source of information for computer graphics professionals interested in graphics developments worldwide. It is now one of the leading journals for researchers, developers and users of computer graphics in both commercial and academic environments. The journal reports on the latest developments in the field throughout the world and covers all aspects of the theory, practice and application of computer graphics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信