Benjamin Grobman, Andrew M. Courtwright, Melissa Yeung, Selvin Jacob, Stefi Lee, Adil Sheikh, Mohamed Keshk, Amy Hackman, Anthony Coppolino, John Dunning, Nirmal Sharma, Hilary J. Goldberg
{"title":"Long-Term Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction-Free Survival Following Lung Transplant in the Presence of Donor-Specific Antibodies","authors":"Benjamin Grobman, Andrew M. Courtwright, Melissa Yeung, Selvin Jacob, Stefi Lee, Adil Sheikh, Mohamed Keshk, Amy Hackman, Anthony Coppolino, John Dunning, Nirmal Sharma, Hilary J. Goldberg","doi":"10.1111/ctr.70241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Highly sensitized patients with advanced lung disease, who are more often Black and Hispanic women, are at increased risk for waitlist death. In 2012, we implemented a protocol to cross any pre-transplant donor-specific antibody (DSA), so long as a prospective complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) crossmatch was negative. We report long-term outcomes, including overall survival and chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD)-free survival.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This was a single-institution retrospective cohort study of lung transplant recipients between October 1, 2012–December 31, 2022. We compared overall retransplant-free survival and CLAD-free survival between recipients with and without pre-formed DSA. Secondary outcomes included freedom from acute cellular rejection (ACR) and antibody-mediated rejection (AMR).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The study cohort included 427 recipients with a median duration of follow-up of 4.3 years (IQR = 2.1–6.9). Thirty-three (7.7%) recipients had pre-transplant DSA with a peak historical mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of 4200 (IQR = 3000–6600, total range 2100–23 000). The median number of DSA per patient was 1 (IQR = 1–2, total range 1–8). There was no difference in adjusted overall survival between recipients with and without pre-formed DSA (HR = 1.39, 95% CI = 0.82–2.36, <i>p</i> = 0.22) or adjusted CLAD-free survival between recipients with and without pre-formed DSA (HR = 1.07, 95% CI = 0.65–1.75, <i>p</i> = 0.79). Recipients with pre-formed DSA did not have increased adjusted hazard of ACR (HR = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.29–1.75, <i>p</i> = 0.45) but did have increased adjusted hazard of AMR (HR = 5.02, 95% CI = 2.11–11.95, <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>In this moderately-sized cohort, a protocol of accepting donor offers for lung transplant candidates with pre-formed DSA but negative CDC crossmatch was not associated with worse overall or CLAD-free survival, within the limitations of the sample size.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10467,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Transplantation","volume":"39 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ctr.70241","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Highly sensitized patients with advanced lung disease, who are more often Black and Hispanic women, are at increased risk for waitlist death. In 2012, we implemented a protocol to cross any pre-transplant donor-specific antibody (DSA), so long as a prospective complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) crossmatch was negative. We report long-term outcomes, including overall survival and chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD)-free survival.
Methods
This was a single-institution retrospective cohort study of lung transplant recipients between October 1, 2012–December 31, 2022. We compared overall retransplant-free survival and CLAD-free survival between recipients with and without pre-formed DSA. Secondary outcomes included freedom from acute cellular rejection (ACR) and antibody-mediated rejection (AMR).
Results
The study cohort included 427 recipients with a median duration of follow-up of 4.3 years (IQR = 2.1–6.9). Thirty-three (7.7%) recipients had pre-transplant DSA with a peak historical mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of 4200 (IQR = 3000–6600, total range 2100–23 000). The median number of DSA per patient was 1 (IQR = 1–2, total range 1–8). There was no difference in adjusted overall survival between recipients with and without pre-formed DSA (HR = 1.39, 95% CI = 0.82–2.36, p = 0.22) or adjusted CLAD-free survival between recipients with and without pre-formed DSA (HR = 1.07, 95% CI = 0.65–1.75, p = 0.79). Recipients with pre-formed DSA did not have increased adjusted hazard of ACR (HR = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.29–1.75, p = 0.45) but did have increased adjusted hazard of AMR (HR = 5.02, 95% CI = 2.11–11.95, p < 0.001).
Conclusions
In this moderately-sized cohort, a protocol of accepting donor offers for lung transplant candidates with pre-formed DSA but negative CDC crossmatch was not associated with worse overall or CLAD-free survival, within the limitations of the sample size.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research aims to serve as a channel of rapid communication for all those involved in the care of patients who require, or have had, organ or tissue transplants, including: kidney, intestine, liver, pancreas, islets, heart, heart valves, lung, bone marrow, cornea, skin, bone, and cartilage, viable or stored.
Published monthly, Clinical Transplantation’s scope is focused on the complete spectrum of present transplant therapies, as well as also those that are experimental or may become possible in future. Topics include:
Immunology and immunosuppression;
Patient preparation;
Social, ethical, and psychological issues;
Complications, short- and long-term results;
Artificial organs;
Donation and preservation of organ and tissue;
Translational studies;
Advances in tissue typing;
Updates on transplant pathology;.
Clinical and translational studies are particularly welcome, as well as focused reviews. Full-length papers and short communications are invited. Clinical reviews are encouraged, as well as seminal papers in basic science which might lead to immediate clinical application. Prominence is regularly given to the results of cooperative surveys conducted by the organ and tissue transplant registries.
Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research is essential reading for clinicians and researchers in the diverse field of transplantation: surgeons; clinical immunologists; cryobiologists; hematologists; gastroenterologists; hepatologists; pulmonologists; nephrologists; cardiologists; and endocrinologists. It will also be of interest to sociologists, psychologists, research workers, and to all health professionals whose combined efforts will improve the prognosis of transplant recipients.