How Food Insecure Are People Living in Australia?

IF 2.1 3区 经济学 Q2 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY
Chandana Maitra
{"title":"How Food Insecure Are People Living in Australia?","authors":"Chandana Maitra","doi":"10.1111/1467-8489.70020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Food insecurity has been an overlooked problem in Australia, with the extant literature voicing concerns around the reliability of the official measure of food insecurity. I provide population prevalence estimates of food insecurity in Australia using fresh data on Food Insecurity Experience Scale reported, for the first time, in the 2020 Household Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) Survey. A single parameter Rasch model is estimated to establish the validity and reliability of FIES as a tool to measure food insecurity in Australia. Cross-nationally comparable prevalence estimates, based on FAO's global reference scale, indicate that in 2020, <i>one in sixteen</i> people experienced moderate to severe food insecurity. Using Australia-specific thresholds on the national scale, <i>one in eleven</i> people were food insecure. Severe food insecurity is a concern in Australia. South Australia and Queensland are the most food-insecure states. Certain subpopulations, such as lone persons, are at higher risk of food insecurity. Household-level measures of food insecurity may hide intrahousehold food hardship. The single-item official measure underestimates the prevalence of food insecurity. Experiential measures such as the US Household Food Security Survey Module must be validated using national-level data prior to their application as instruments to measure food insecurity in Australia. Food security policies must be context specific.</p>","PeriodicalId":55427,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics","volume":"69 3","pages":"717-731"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1467-8489.70020","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8489.70020","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Food insecurity has been an overlooked problem in Australia, with the extant literature voicing concerns around the reliability of the official measure of food insecurity. I provide population prevalence estimates of food insecurity in Australia using fresh data on Food Insecurity Experience Scale reported, for the first time, in the 2020 Household Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) Survey. A single parameter Rasch model is estimated to establish the validity and reliability of FIES as a tool to measure food insecurity in Australia. Cross-nationally comparable prevalence estimates, based on FAO's global reference scale, indicate that in 2020, one in sixteen people experienced moderate to severe food insecurity. Using Australia-specific thresholds on the national scale, one in eleven people were food insecure. Severe food insecurity is a concern in Australia. South Australia and Queensland are the most food-insecure states. Certain subpopulations, such as lone persons, are at higher risk of food insecurity. Household-level measures of food insecurity may hide intrahousehold food hardship. The single-item official measure underestimates the prevalence of food insecurity. Experiential measures such as the US Household Food Security Survey Module must be validated using national-level data prior to their application as instruments to measure food insecurity in Australia. Food security policies must be context specific.

Abstract Image

澳大利亚人的粮食安全状况如何?
在澳大利亚,粮食不安全一直是一个被忽视的问题,现有文献对官方粮食不安全衡量标准的可靠性表示担忧。我利用《2020年澳大利亚家庭收入和劳动力动态调查》(HILDA)中首次报告的粮食不安全体验量表的最新数据,提供了澳大利亚粮食不安全人口患病率估计。估计单参数Rasch模型以建立FIES作为衡量澳大利亚粮食不安全的工具的有效性和可靠性。基于粮农组织全球参考比额表的跨国可比患病率估计表明,到2020年,每16个人中就有1人经历中度至重度粮食不安全。按照澳大利亚在全国范围内的特定阈值计算,每11个人中就有1人处于粮食不安全状态。严重的粮食不安全是澳大利亚的一个问题。南澳大利亚和昆士兰是粮食最不安全的州。某些亚群体,如独居者,面临粮食不安全的风险更高。家庭层面的粮食不安全措施可能会掩盖家庭内部的粮食困难。这一单项官方指标低估了粮食不安全的普遍程度。经验措施,如美国家庭食品安全调查模块,在作为衡量澳大利亚粮食不安全的工具应用之前,必须使用国家级数据进行验证。粮食安全政策必须因地制宜。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
>24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics (AJARE) provides a forum for innovative and scholarly work in agricultural and resource economics. First published in 1997, the Journal succeeds the Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics and the Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, upholding the tradition of these long-established journals. Accordingly, the editors are guided by the following objectives: -To maintain a high standard of analytical rigour offering sufficient variety of content so as to appeal to a broad spectrum of both academic and professional economists and policymakers. -In maintaining the tradition of its predecessor journals, to combine articles with policy reviews and surveys of key analytical issues in agricultural and resource economics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信