An Inexpensive and Ultrasound-Compatible Lumbar Puncture Model Using SCOBY as an Effective Simulation Tool: The DIY LP Study

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Gisela A. Kristono, Henry Li, Peter Watts, Melita Macdonald, Alice Rogan, Brad Peckler
{"title":"An Inexpensive and Ultrasound-Compatible Lumbar Puncture Model Using SCOBY as an Effective Simulation Tool: The DIY LP Study","authors":"Gisela A. Kristono,&nbsp;Henry Li,&nbsp;Peter Watts,&nbsp;Melita Macdonald,&nbsp;Alice Rogan,&nbsp;Brad Peckler","doi":"10.1111/1742-6723.70101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Lumbar puncture (LP) simulators have high costs and suboptimal realism. This study aimed to develop an affordable, high-fidelity and ultrasound-compatible model.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We created a LP Simulator using three-dimensional printing, silicon, ballistic gel and symbiotic culture of bacteria and yeast (SCOBY). This was an observational study comparing the DIY-LP to a commercial simulator. Pre- and post-surveys were done.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 18 emergency medicine doctors (12 junior and six senior) participated in the study. Ten participants (56%; five junior doctors and five consultants) were successful with the DIY-LP simulator within the first two attempts without ultrasound guidance, compared with 13 participants (72%; seven junior doctors and six consultants) for the commercial simulator (<i>p</i>-value 0.49). The majority of participants agreed that both models were useful as educational tools.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This study has demonstrated a low-cost and ultrasound-compatible LP model that is comparable to a commercial LP simulator.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11604,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Australasia","volume":"37 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1742-6723.70101","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Medicine Australasia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1742-6723.70101","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Lumbar puncture (LP) simulators have high costs and suboptimal realism. This study aimed to develop an affordable, high-fidelity and ultrasound-compatible model.

Methods

We created a LP Simulator using three-dimensional printing, silicon, ballistic gel and symbiotic culture of bacteria and yeast (SCOBY). This was an observational study comparing the DIY-LP to a commercial simulator. Pre- and post-surveys were done.

Results

A total of 18 emergency medicine doctors (12 junior and six senior) participated in the study. Ten participants (56%; five junior doctors and five consultants) were successful with the DIY-LP simulator within the first two attempts without ultrasound guidance, compared with 13 participants (72%; seven junior doctors and six consultants) for the commercial simulator (p-value 0.49). The majority of participants agreed that both models were useful as educational tools.

Conclusion

This study has demonstrated a low-cost and ultrasound-compatible LP model that is comparable to a commercial LP simulator.

Abstract Image

使用SCOBY作为有效模拟工具的廉价且超声兼容的腰椎穿刺模型:DIY LP研究
目的腰椎穿刺(LP)模拟器成本高,真实感欠佳。本研究旨在开发一种经济、高保真和超声兼容的模型。方法采用三维打印、硅、弹道凝胶和细菌与酵母共生培养(SCOBY)制备LP模拟器。这是一项观察性研究,将DIY-LP与商业模拟器进行比较。进行了前后调查。结果共有18名急诊医师(初级12名,高级6名)参与研究。10名参与者(56%;5名初级医生和5名咨询医生)在没有超声引导的情况下,在前两次尝试中使用DIY-LP模拟器成功,而13名参与者(72%;7名初级医生和6名顾问)用于商业模拟器(p值0.49)。大多数与会者同意这两种模式都是有用的教育工具。本研究证明了一种低成本和超声兼容的LP模型,可与商用LP模拟器相媲美。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Emergency Medicine Australasia
Emergency Medicine Australasia 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
13.00%
发文量
217
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Emergency Medicine Australasia is the official journal of the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine (ACEM) and the Australasian Society for Emergency Medicine (ASEM), and publishes original articles dealing with all aspects of clinical practice, research, education and experiences in emergency medicine. Original articles are published under the following sections: Original Research, Paediatric Emergency Medicine, Disaster Medicine, Education and Training, Ethics, International Emergency Medicine, Management and Quality, Medicolegal Matters, Prehospital Care, Public Health, Rural and Remote Care, Technology, Toxicology and Trauma. Accepted papers become the copyright of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信