The Moderating Effect of Informal Institutions: Clans and Straw Burning in China

IF 2.1 3区 经济学 Q2 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY
Liang Tang, Tongwei Qiu, Biliang Luo
{"title":"The Moderating Effect of Informal Institutions: Clans and Straw Burning in China","authors":"Liang Tang,&nbsp;Tongwei Qiu,&nbsp;Biliang Luo","doi":"10.1111/1467-8489.70022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Despite the implementation of a straw-burning prohibition in 1999, widespread straw burning has still persisted in rural areas over the past two decades. However, there has been little research on the role informal institutions play in this issue. Drawing on village-level data from the 2015 to 2023 China Household Finance Survey, this paper aims to examine the interaction between clans, the most important form of informal institutions in rural China and straw burning. The estimated results show that clans have a facilitating effect on village-level straw burning, though this effect is weakened to some extent when the straw-burning prohibition policy is introduced. Mechanism analysis reveals that the influence of clans on straw burning is notably stronger when clan members hold leadership positions within the village. Larger village populations and higher rates of non-grain farming further amplify this effect. Further analysis indicates that the presence of multiple clans within a village also contributes to increased straw burning. Our findings suggest that the effectiveness of straw-burning policies reflects the broader interplay between formal and informal institutions, highlighting the need to consider the influence of informal institutions when enforcing such policies.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55427,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics","volume":"69 3","pages":"566-583"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8489.70022","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the implementation of a straw-burning prohibition in 1999, widespread straw burning has still persisted in rural areas over the past two decades. However, there has been little research on the role informal institutions play in this issue. Drawing on village-level data from the 2015 to 2023 China Household Finance Survey, this paper aims to examine the interaction between clans, the most important form of informal institutions in rural China and straw burning. The estimated results show that clans have a facilitating effect on village-level straw burning, though this effect is weakened to some extent when the straw-burning prohibition policy is introduced. Mechanism analysis reveals that the influence of clans on straw burning is notably stronger when clan members hold leadership positions within the village. Larger village populations and higher rates of non-grain farming further amplify this effect. Further analysis indicates that the presence of multiple clans within a village also contributes to increased straw burning. Our findings suggest that the effectiveness of straw-burning policies reflects the broader interplay between formal and informal institutions, highlighting the need to consider the influence of informal institutions when enforcing such policies.

非正式制度的调节效应:宗族与中国秸秆焚烧
尽管在1999年实施了秸秆焚烧禁令,但在过去的二十年里,农村地区的秸秆焚烧仍然普遍存在。然而,关于非正式制度在这一问题中所起作用的研究却很少。本文利用2015 - 2023年中国家庭金融调查的村级数据,旨在研究中国农村最重要的非正式制度形式宗族与秸秆焚烧之间的相互作用。估算结果表明,宗族对村级秸秆焚烧具有促进作用,但在禁止秸秆焚烧政策出台后,宗族对村级秸秆焚烧的促进作用有所减弱。机制分析表明,当宗族成员在村内担任领导职务时,宗族对秸秆焚烧的影响显著增强。更大的村庄人口和更高的非粮食农业比例进一步放大了这种影响。进一步的分析表明,一个村庄内多个氏族的存在也助长了秸秆焚烧的增加。我们的研究结果表明,秸秆焚烧政策的有效性反映了正式制度和非正式制度之间更广泛的相互作用,强调在执行此类政策时需要考虑非正式制度的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
>24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics (AJARE) provides a forum for innovative and scholarly work in agricultural and resource economics. First published in 1997, the Journal succeeds the Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics and the Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, upholding the tradition of these long-established journals. Accordingly, the editors are guided by the following objectives: -To maintain a high standard of analytical rigour offering sufficient variety of content so as to appeal to a broad spectrum of both academic and professional economists and policymakers. -In maintaining the tradition of its predecessor journals, to combine articles with policy reviews and surveys of key analytical issues in agricultural and resource economics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信