Urban flourish or peril: Navigating the safe and just space through the lens of ecosystem services in China’s urbanization

IF 9.8 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL
Geography and Sustainability Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-23 DOI:10.1016/j.geosus.2025.100331
Qin Zhou , Changgao Cheng , Zhou Fang , Shi Xue , Qiuya Zhao , Zhongde Huang , Jie Wang , Wei Jin , Chenjun Zhang , Yang Bai , Ni Geng , Hengquan Zhang
{"title":"Urban flourish or peril: Navigating the safe and just space through the lens of ecosystem services in China’s urbanization","authors":"Qin Zhou ,&nbsp;Changgao Cheng ,&nbsp;Zhou Fang ,&nbsp;Shi Xue ,&nbsp;Qiuya Zhao ,&nbsp;Zhongde Huang ,&nbsp;Jie Wang ,&nbsp;Wei Jin ,&nbsp;Chenjun Zhang ,&nbsp;Yang Bai ,&nbsp;Ni Geng ,&nbsp;Hengquan Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.geosus.2025.100331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Urbanization develops with the goal of establishing improved and more sustainable habitats for residents. Environmental and social performance must be simultaneously monitored to ascertain whether regions are progressing towards or deviating from the safe and just space (SJS) in urbanization. Despite relevant studies, the absence of indicators that bridge ecological preservation and human well-beings renders dual monitoring challenging. This study bridged the gap by exploring the interactions between urbanization, ecosystem services (ESs), and basic water, energy, and food (WEF) needs within the SJS framework across China and its provinces. By quantifying the minimum and actual demands for freshwater withdrawal, carbon emissions, phosphorus emissions, and land use, as well as the supply of ESs into unified biophysical indicators, we found that: (1) China can meet the basic WEF needs for all from 2000 to 2020, but only water and land provisioning ESs can operate within the SJS. Carbon emissions surpassed the sequestration capacity in 2010, while phosphorus purification ES has consistently been unsafe. (2) The SJS performance in terms of ecological and social fulfilment exhibited scale differences and undergone changes with urbanization. Overall, no province in China can consistently operate within all SJSs. (3) In the process of urbanization, improvements in ecological protection and production practices in most provinces expanded the size of SJS, but the continuous increase in total demand failed to steer regions toward safer spaces. Our framework emphasized the common but differentiated pathways that regions at varying stages of urbanization navigate to achieve safety and justice. It also provides an applicable solution for regions aiming to pursue urban growth while maintaining ecological conservation and social justice, ultimately achieving sustainable development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":52374,"journal":{"name":"Geography and Sustainability","volume":"6 5","pages":"Article 100331"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geography and Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666683925000707","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Urbanization develops with the goal of establishing improved and more sustainable habitats for residents. Environmental and social performance must be simultaneously monitored to ascertain whether regions are progressing towards or deviating from the safe and just space (SJS) in urbanization. Despite relevant studies, the absence of indicators that bridge ecological preservation and human well-beings renders dual monitoring challenging. This study bridged the gap by exploring the interactions between urbanization, ecosystem services (ESs), and basic water, energy, and food (WEF) needs within the SJS framework across China and its provinces. By quantifying the minimum and actual demands for freshwater withdrawal, carbon emissions, phosphorus emissions, and land use, as well as the supply of ESs into unified biophysical indicators, we found that: (1) China can meet the basic WEF needs for all from 2000 to 2020, but only water and land provisioning ESs can operate within the SJS. Carbon emissions surpassed the sequestration capacity in 2010, while phosphorus purification ES has consistently been unsafe. (2) The SJS performance in terms of ecological and social fulfilment exhibited scale differences and undergone changes with urbanization. Overall, no province in China can consistently operate within all SJSs. (3) In the process of urbanization, improvements in ecological protection and production practices in most provinces expanded the size of SJS, but the continuous increase in total demand failed to steer regions toward safer spaces. Our framework emphasized the common but differentiated pathways that regions at varying stages of urbanization navigate to achieve safety and justice. It also provides an applicable solution for regions aiming to pursue urban growth while maintaining ecological conservation and social justice, ultimately achieving sustainable development.

Abstract Image

城市繁荣或危险:中国城市化中生态系统服务视角下的安全与公正空间导航
城市化的发展目标是为居民建立更好的、更可持续的栖息地。必须同时监测环境和社会绩效,以确定各区域在城市化进程中是朝着安全与公正空间前进还是偏离了安全与公正空间。尽管有相关研究,但缺乏连接生态保护和人类福祉的指标,这使得双重监测具有挑战性。本研究通过在中国和各省的SJS框架内探索城市化、生态系统服务(ESs)和基本水、能源和食物(WEF)需求之间的相互作用,弥合了这一差距。通过将淡水提取量、碳排放、磷排放、土地利用的最小需求和实际需求以及生态系统的供给量化为统一的生物物理指标,我们发现:(1)2000 - 2020年中国可以满足世界经济论坛的基本需求,但只有水和土地供应的生态系统可以在SJS内运行。2010年,碳排放量超过了固存能力,而磷净化ES一直不安全。(2)城市居民在生态和社会成就感方面表现出尺度差异,并随城市化进程发生变化。总体而言,中国没有一个省份能够在所有sjs中持续运行。(3)在城市化进程中,大部分省份的生态保护和生产实践的改善扩大了SJS的规模,但总需求的持续增加未能引导区域向更安全的空间发展。我们的框架强调了处于不同城市化阶段的地区实现安全和正义的共同但有区别的途径。它还为旨在追求城市增长同时保持生态保护和社会正义,最终实现可持续发展的地区提供了适用的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geography and Sustainability
Geography and Sustainability Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
16.70
自引率
3.10%
发文量
32
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Geography and Sustainability serves as a central hub for interdisciplinary research and education aimed at promoting sustainable development from an integrated geography perspective. By bridging natural and human sciences, the journal fosters broader analysis and innovative thinking on global and regional sustainability issues. Geography and Sustainability welcomes original, high-quality research articles, review articles, short communications, technical comments, perspective articles and editorials on the following themes: Geographical Processes: Interactions with and between water, soil, atmosphere and the biosphere and their spatio-temporal variations; Human-Environmental Systems: Interactions between humans and the environment, resilience of socio-ecological systems and vulnerability; Ecosystem Services and Human Wellbeing: Ecosystem structure, processes, services and their linkages with human wellbeing; Sustainable Development: Theory, practice and critical challenges in sustainable development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书