{"title":"Female urinary continence mechanism: a dynamic biomechanical balance","authors":"Daoming Tian, Ling Li, Yubin Wen, Yuan Li, Hongcheng Li, Jiangna Gu, Qian Luo, Jihong Shen","doi":"10.1016/j.mehy.2025.111708","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Female urinary incontinence has been redefined as a dynamic biomechanical equilibrium governed by three synergistic mechanisms: (1) Mechanical equilibrium mechanism of bladder neck-perineal body dynamics, which stabilizes urethral closure during pressure surges; and (2) urethral kinking through mid-proximal urethral displacement differences; (3) sphincter-pelvic floor muscle synergy to amplify compressive forces. (4).Neuro-Biomechanical Synergistic Control Mechanism.This hypothesis challenges static anatomical models by emphasizing real-time adaptive biomechanics and explains stress urinary incontinence (SUI) through force transmission, neuromuscular coordination, or chronic pressure overload faults. Clinically, real-time imaging and computational modeling are advocated to replace traditional examination modalities to quantify biomechanical deficits-structural, functional, and neurogenic. Targeted interventions include perineal body reinforcement surgery and nerve retraining programs. Validation requires multidisciplinary trials: prospective cohorts linking dynamic parameters to incontinence outcomes, finite element simulations of mechanism interactions, and randomized comparisons of mechanism-specific therapies. The framework bridges biomechanics, neural control, and clinical practice, enabling a shift from symptom management to precise mechanism-based SUI treatment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18425,"journal":{"name":"Medical hypotheses","volume":"201 ","pages":"Article 111708"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical hypotheses","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306987725001471","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Female urinary incontinence has been redefined as a dynamic biomechanical equilibrium governed by three synergistic mechanisms: (1) Mechanical equilibrium mechanism of bladder neck-perineal body dynamics, which stabilizes urethral closure during pressure surges; and (2) urethral kinking through mid-proximal urethral displacement differences; (3) sphincter-pelvic floor muscle synergy to amplify compressive forces. (4).Neuro-Biomechanical Synergistic Control Mechanism.This hypothesis challenges static anatomical models by emphasizing real-time adaptive biomechanics and explains stress urinary incontinence (SUI) through force transmission, neuromuscular coordination, or chronic pressure overload faults. Clinically, real-time imaging and computational modeling are advocated to replace traditional examination modalities to quantify biomechanical deficits-structural, functional, and neurogenic. Targeted interventions include perineal body reinforcement surgery and nerve retraining programs. Validation requires multidisciplinary trials: prospective cohorts linking dynamic parameters to incontinence outcomes, finite element simulations of mechanism interactions, and randomized comparisons of mechanism-specific therapies. The framework bridges biomechanics, neural control, and clinical practice, enabling a shift from symptom management to precise mechanism-based SUI treatment.
期刊介绍:
Medical Hypotheses is a forum for ideas in medicine and related biomedical sciences. It will publish interesting and important theoretical papers that foster the diversity and debate upon which the scientific process thrives. The Aims and Scope of Medical Hypotheses are no different now from what was proposed by the founder of the journal, the late Dr David Horrobin. In his introduction to the first issue of the Journal, he asks ''what sorts of papers will be published in Medical Hypotheses? and goes on to answer ''Medical Hypotheses will publish papers which describe theories, ideas which have a great deal of observational support and some hypotheses where experimental support is yet fragmentary''. (Horrobin DF, 1975 Ideas in Biomedical Science: Reasons for the foundation of Medical Hypotheses. Medical Hypotheses Volume 1, Issue 1, January-February 1975, Pages 1-2.). Medical Hypotheses was therefore launched, and still exists today, to give novel, radical new ideas and speculations in medicine open-minded consideration, opening the field to radical hypotheses which would be rejected by most conventional journals. Papers in Medical Hypotheses take a standard scientific form in terms of style, structure and referencing. The journal therefore constitutes a bridge between cutting-edge theory and the mainstream of medical and scientific communication, which ideas must eventually enter if they are to be critiqued and tested against observations.