Participatory research in low resource settings - Endeavours in epistemic justice at the Banyan, India

Mrinalini Ravi , Swarna Tyagi , Vandana Gopikumar , Emma Emily de Wit , Joske Bunders , Deborah Padgett , Barbara Regeer
{"title":"Participatory research in low resource settings - Endeavours in epistemic justice at the Banyan, India","authors":"Mrinalini Ravi ,&nbsp;Swarna Tyagi ,&nbsp;Vandana Gopikumar ,&nbsp;Emma Emily de Wit ,&nbsp;Joske Bunders ,&nbsp;Deborah Padgett ,&nbsp;Barbara Regeer","doi":"10.1016/j.jrt.2025.100123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Involving persons with lived experience in knowledge generation through participatory research (PR) has become increasingly important to challenge power structures in knowledge production and research. In the case of persons with lived experiences of mental illness, participatory research has gained popularity since the early 70 s, but there is little empirical work from countries like India on how PR can be implemented in psychiatric settings.</div><div>This study focuses on exploring the way persons with lived experiences of mental illness can be engaged as peer researchers in a service utilisation audit of The Banyan’s inpatient, outpatient and inclusive living facilities. The audit was an attempt by The Banyan to co-opt clients as peer-researchers, thereby enhancing participatory approaches to care planning and provision. Notes and transcripts of research process activities (three meetings for training purposes), 180 interviews as part of the audit, as well as follow up Focus Group Discussions (<em>n</em> = 4) conducted with 18 peer researchers, were used to document their experiences and gather feedback on the training and research process.</div><div>We foundthat, reflected against the lack of formal education in the past, the opportunity and support received to be part of a research endeavour, elicited a sense of pride, relief, and liberation in peer researchers. Additionally, actualising the role of an academic and researcher, and not just being passive responders to people in positions of intellectual and systemic power, engendered a sense of responsibility and accountability to peer researchers, and to the mental health system. Thirdly, supporting persons with experiences of mental illness in participatory research activities, especially in the context of low resource settings, requires specific consideration of practical conditions and adjustments needed to avoid tokenism. Finally, both peer- and staff researchers spoke about persisting hierarchies between them which deserve attention.</div><div>We conclude that participatory research has a significant scope amongst clients from disadvantaged communities in low-resource settings. Respondents repeatedly expressed an urgency for persons with lived experience to contribute to mental health pedagogy, and, in so doing, disrupt archaic treatment approaches.. Experiences from this enquiry also call for a rethink on how training in research can be developed for individuals without formal education and with cognitive difficulties, with the help of auditory support systemssuch that key concepts are available and accessible, and long-term memory becomes less of a deterrent in the pursuit of knowledge and truth.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73937,"journal":{"name":"Journal of responsible technology","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 100123"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of responsible technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666659625000198","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Involving persons with lived experience in knowledge generation through participatory research (PR) has become increasingly important to challenge power structures in knowledge production and research. In the case of persons with lived experiences of mental illness, participatory research has gained popularity since the early 70 s, but there is little empirical work from countries like India on how PR can be implemented in psychiatric settings.
This study focuses on exploring the way persons with lived experiences of mental illness can be engaged as peer researchers in a service utilisation audit of The Banyan’s inpatient, outpatient and inclusive living facilities. The audit was an attempt by The Banyan to co-opt clients as peer-researchers, thereby enhancing participatory approaches to care planning and provision. Notes and transcripts of research process activities (three meetings for training purposes), 180 interviews as part of the audit, as well as follow up Focus Group Discussions (n = 4) conducted with 18 peer researchers, were used to document their experiences and gather feedback on the training and research process.
We foundthat, reflected against the lack of formal education in the past, the opportunity and support received to be part of a research endeavour, elicited a sense of pride, relief, and liberation in peer researchers. Additionally, actualising the role of an academic and researcher, and not just being passive responders to people in positions of intellectual and systemic power, engendered a sense of responsibility and accountability to peer researchers, and to the mental health system. Thirdly, supporting persons with experiences of mental illness in participatory research activities, especially in the context of low resource settings, requires specific consideration of practical conditions and adjustments needed to avoid tokenism. Finally, both peer- and staff researchers spoke about persisting hierarchies between them which deserve attention.
We conclude that participatory research has a significant scope amongst clients from disadvantaged communities in low-resource settings. Respondents repeatedly expressed an urgency for persons with lived experience to contribute to mental health pedagogy, and, in so doing, disrupt archaic treatment approaches.. Experiences from this enquiry also call for a rethink on how training in research can be developed for individuals without formal education and with cognitive difficulties, with the help of auditory support systemssuch that key concepts are available and accessible, and long-term memory becomes less of a deterrent in the pursuit of knowledge and truth.
参与性研究在低资源设置-在榕树认识正义的努力,印度
通过参与式研究(PR)让有经验的人参与知识生成,对于挑战知识生产和研究中的权力结构变得越来越重要。就有精神疾病经历的人而言,参与性研究自70年代初开始流行,但印度等国家很少有关于如何在精神疾病环境中实施PR的实证研究。本研究的重点是探索有精神疾病生活经历的人可以作为同行研究人员参与榕树医院住院、门诊和包容性生活设施的服务利用审计。这次审计是The Banyan的一次尝试,旨在让客户成为同行研究人员,从而加强护理计划和提供的参与式方法。研究过程活动的笔记和抄本(三次培训会议)、作为审计一部分的180次访谈以及与18名同行研究人员进行的后续焦点小组讨论(n = 4)被用来记录他们的经验并收集关于培训和研究过程的反馈。我们发现,与过去缺乏正规教育相比,参与研究工作的机会和支持让同行研究人员感到自豪、宽慰和解放。此外,实现学术和研究人员的角色,而不仅仅是对智力和系统权力职位上的人的被动反应,产生了对同行研究人员和精神卫生系统的责任感和责任感。第三,在参与性研究活动中支持有精神疾病经历的人,特别是在资源匮乏的情况下,需要具体考虑实际情况和必要的调整,以避免表面现象。最后,同事和员工研究人员都谈到了他们之间持续存在的等级制度,这值得关注。我们的结论是,参与式研究在资源匮乏的弱势社区的客户中有很大的应用范围。答复者一再表示,迫切需要有实际经验的人为精神卫生教育学做出贡献,并在这样做时打破陈旧的治疗方法。这项调查的经验也要求我们重新思考,在听觉支持系统的帮助下,如何为没有受过正规教育和有认知困难的个人开发研究培训,这样关键概念就可以获得和理解,长期记忆在追求知识和真理的过程中就不再是一种阻碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of responsible technology
Journal of responsible technology Information Systems, Artificial Intelligence, Human-Computer Interaction
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
168 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信