Implicit occupational gender stereotypes in India: A skills-based empirical analysis using multiple IATs

IF 1.9 3区 社会学 Q2 WOMENS STUDIES
Nancy Gupta, Venkat Ram Reddy, Sunanda Sangwan
{"title":"Implicit occupational gender stereotypes in India: A skills-based empirical analysis using multiple IATs","authors":"Nancy Gupta,&nbsp;Venkat Ram Reddy,&nbsp;Sunanda Sangwan","doi":"10.1016/j.wsif.2025.103169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The study investigates Occupational Gender Stereotypes (OGS) in India, where women's representation in high skill occupations remains limited despite economic growth. To assess implicit biases, we developed six Occupational Gender IATs (OGIATs) covering 84 occupations, classified using India's National Classification of Occupations (NCO) aligned with ILO standards. 642 participants from the general population completed implicit and explicit measures, such as a Social Role Questionnaire. Results revealed strong implicit associations linking males to high skill occupations (e.g., medical technicians, aircraft controllers) and females to low skill occupations. Men exhibited significantly stronger implicit biases than women, while education level had no effect, indicating that such biases persist regardless of academic attainment. In contrast, explicit measures showed weaker associations, underscoring the gap between conscious beliefs and unconscious bias. These findings highlight the complexity of gender bias in India's labor market and the need for multidimensional assessments. The OGIATs developed offer a robust tool for future research and policy interventions aimed at reducing gender-based disparities in employment and workforce inclusion.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47940,"journal":{"name":"Womens Studies International Forum","volume":"112 ","pages":"Article 103169"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Womens Studies International Forum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277539525001189","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"WOMENS STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study investigates Occupational Gender Stereotypes (OGS) in India, where women's representation in high skill occupations remains limited despite economic growth. To assess implicit biases, we developed six Occupational Gender IATs (OGIATs) covering 84 occupations, classified using India's National Classification of Occupations (NCO) aligned with ILO standards. 642 participants from the general population completed implicit and explicit measures, such as a Social Role Questionnaire. Results revealed strong implicit associations linking males to high skill occupations (e.g., medical technicians, aircraft controllers) and females to low skill occupations. Men exhibited significantly stronger implicit biases than women, while education level had no effect, indicating that such biases persist regardless of academic attainment. In contrast, explicit measures showed weaker associations, underscoring the gap between conscious beliefs and unconscious bias. These findings highlight the complexity of gender bias in India's labor market and the need for multidimensional assessments. The OGIATs developed offer a robust tool for future research and policy interventions aimed at reducing gender-based disparities in employment and workforce inclusion.
印度隐性职业性别刻板印象:基于技能的实证分析
该研究调查了印度的职业性别刻板印象(OGS),尽管经济增长,但女性在高技能职业中的代表性仍然有限。为了评估隐性偏见,我们开发了六个职业性别评估工具(OGIATs),涵盖84个职业,使用与国际劳工组织标准一致的印度国家职业分类(NCO)进行分类。来自普通人群的642名参与者完成了隐性和显性测量,如社会角色问卷。结果显示,男性与高技能职业(如医疗技术人员、飞机管制员)和女性与低技能职业之间存在强烈的隐性联系。男性比女性表现出更强的内隐偏见,而教育水平没有影响,这表明这种偏见无论学术成就如何都存在。相比之下,明确的测量显示出较弱的关联,强调了有意识的信念和无意识的偏见之间的差距。这些发现凸显了印度劳动力市场性别偏见的复杂性,以及开展多维评估的必要性。OGIATs为未来的研究和政策干预提供了一个强有力的工具,旨在减少就业和劳动力包容方面的性别差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
63
审稿时长
79 days
期刊介绍: Women"s Studies International Forum (formerly Women"s Studies International Quarterly, established in 1978) is a bimonthly journal to aid the distribution and exchange of feminist research in the multidisciplinary, international area of women"s studies and in feminist research in other disciplines. The policy of the journal is to establish a feminist forum for discussion and debate. The journal seeks to critique and reconceptualize existing knowledge, to examine and re-evaluate the manner in which knowledge is produced and distributed, and to assess the implications this has for women"s lives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信