Unveiling policy gaps to better address the causes and drivers of tropical deforestation: A case study from the Colombian Amazon

IF 5.9 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Diego Valbuena , Jairo Santander , Javier García-Estévez , Nathalia Franco
{"title":"Unveiling policy gaps to better address the causes and drivers of tropical deforestation: A case study from the Colombian Amazon","authors":"Diego Valbuena ,&nbsp;Jairo Santander ,&nbsp;Javier García-Estévez ,&nbsp;Nathalia Franco","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite a clear understanding of the factors driving deforestation and the acknowledged need to control it, tropical deforestation remains a significant social and environmental challenge. Public policy can play a crucial role in combating tropical deforestation, yet gaps in policy formulation, operationalisation, and implementation can hinder its effectiveness. There is currently a lack of detailed analysis on policy gaps, especially concerning tropical deforestation. Our study analysed the policy gaps in a deforestation frontier in the Colombian Amazon during the post-conflict period to enhance our understanding of why public policies might be inadequate in curbing deforestation. This analysis involved identifying potential gaps in the formulation, operationalisation, and implementation of a major national policy framework aimed at controlling deforestation in Colombia. To identify and delineate these policy gaps, we combined secondary literature on deforestation drivers, existing databases, institutional capacity analyses, and national statistics. Our findings indicate that land speculation, a power vacuum, the expansion of pastures, cattle ranching, and infrastructure development are driving tropical deforestation in the study area. Additionally, this process of deforestation is linked to systemic and structural challenges in institutional capacity, broadening policy gaps, such as the exclusion of the main drivers in policy formulation, a lack of local capacity and resources for policy implementation, diverging visions and preferences for regional development, centralisation, and policy obsolescence, which affect both policy operationalisation and implementation. Based on these identified gaps, we discuss potential policy interventions to address them in the study area and other tropical regions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17933,"journal":{"name":"Land Use Policy","volume":"158 ","pages":"Article 107697"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Land Use Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837725002315","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite a clear understanding of the factors driving deforestation and the acknowledged need to control it, tropical deforestation remains a significant social and environmental challenge. Public policy can play a crucial role in combating tropical deforestation, yet gaps in policy formulation, operationalisation, and implementation can hinder its effectiveness. There is currently a lack of detailed analysis on policy gaps, especially concerning tropical deforestation. Our study analysed the policy gaps in a deforestation frontier in the Colombian Amazon during the post-conflict period to enhance our understanding of why public policies might be inadequate in curbing deforestation. This analysis involved identifying potential gaps in the formulation, operationalisation, and implementation of a major national policy framework aimed at controlling deforestation in Colombia. To identify and delineate these policy gaps, we combined secondary literature on deforestation drivers, existing databases, institutional capacity analyses, and national statistics. Our findings indicate that land speculation, a power vacuum, the expansion of pastures, cattle ranching, and infrastructure development are driving tropical deforestation in the study area. Additionally, this process of deforestation is linked to systemic and structural challenges in institutional capacity, broadening policy gaps, such as the exclusion of the main drivers in policy formulation, a lack of local capacity and resources for policy implementation, diverging visions and preferences for regional development, centralisation, and policy obsolescence, which affect both policy operationalisation and implementation. Based on these identified gaps, we discuss potential policy interventions to address them in the study area and other tropical regions.
揭示政策差距,更好地解决热带森林砍伐的原因和驱动因素:哥伦比亚亚马逊地区的案例研究
尽管对森林砍伐的驱动因素和公认的控制需要有了清晰的认识,热带森林砍伐仍然是一个重大的社会和环境挑战。公共政策可以在打击热带森林砍伐方面发挥关键作用,但政策制定、实施和实施方面的差距可能会阻碍其有效性。目前缺乏对政策差距的详细分析,特别是在热带森林砍伐方面。我们的研究分析了冲突后时期哥伦比亚亚马逊森林砍伐前沿地区的政策缺口,以加深我们对公共政策在遏制森林砍伐方面可能不足的理解。这项分析包括确定旨在控制哥伦比亚森林砍伐的主要国家政策框架在制定、实施和实施方面的潜在差距。为了识别和描述这些政策差距,我们结合了关于森林砍伐驱动因素的二手文献、现有数据库、机构能力分析和国家统计数据。我们的研究结果表明,土地投机、权力真空、牧场扩张、养牛场和基础设施建设正在推动研究地区的热带森林砍伐。此外,这一毁林过程还与制度能力方面的系统性和结构性挑战、政策差距扩大(如政策制定中的主要驱动因素被排除在外)、缺乏地方实施政策的能力和资源、对区域发展的不同愿景和偏好、中央集权和政策过时有关,这些都影响到政策的运作和实施。基于这些确定的差距,我们讨论了在研究区域和其他热带地区解决这些差距的潜在政策干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Land Use Policy
Land Use Policy ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
8.50%
发文量
553
期刊介绍: Land Use Policy is an international and interdisciplinary journal concerned with the social, economic, political, legal, physical and planning aspects of urban and rural land use. Land Use Policy examines issues in geography, agriculture, forestry, irrigation, environmental conservation, housing, urban development and transport in both developed and developing countries through major refereed articles and shorter viewpoint pieces.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信