Is adjuvant immunotherapy necessary after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in patients with resectable stage III NSCLC? A two-center real-world study.

Song Guan, Hui Wang, Zhaoxin Chen, Fengrui Guo, Guozhen Yi, Xingyu Du, Jingjing Yan, Cuimeng Tian
{"title":"Is adjuvant immunotherapy necessary after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in patients with resectable stage III NSCLC? A two-center real-world study.","authors":"Song Guan, Hui Wang, Zhaoxin Chen, Fengrui Guo, Guozhen Yi, Xingyu Du, Jingjing Yan, Cuimeng Tian","doi":"10.1007/s00262-025-04130-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The value of adjuvant immunotherapy in patients with resectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of additional adjuvant immunotherapy in patients with stage III NSCLC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with stage III NSCLC who received neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy followed by radical surgery, with or without adjuvant immunotherapy, were retrospectively enrolled across two hospitals. Event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed from the initiation of neoadjuvant treatment and were estimated by the Kaplan‒Meier method. One-to-one propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were used to minimize confounding.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 184 eligible patients were enrolled, of whom 105 (57.1%) received adjuvant immunotherapy and 79 (42.9%) did not. After 1:1 PSM, the addition of adjuvant immunotherapy did not significantly improve EFS (2-year EFS: 62.3% vs. 66.1%, P = 0.653) or OS (2-year OS: 92.7% vs. 89.6%, P = 0.196). Subgroup analyses, stratified by the pathological complete response (pCR) status, further confirmed that adjuvant immunotherapy did not significantly improve survival in either the pCR subgroup or the non-pCR subgroup. Similar results were obtained after IPTW. Exploratory analysis revealed that 3 cycles of neoadjuvant immunotherapy might be more beneficial than 2 (pCR: 40.8% vs. 30.6%, P = 0.292; 2-year EFS: 75.0% vs. 54.5%, P = 0.111) or 4 (pCR: 42.1% vs. 36.8%, P = 0.740; 2-year EFS: 63.2% vs. 51.5%, P = 0.343) cycles.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The addition of adjuvant immunotherapy to neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy may not be necessary in patients with resectable stage III NSCLC. Three cycles of neoadjuvant immunotherapy appear to be an appropriate treatment regimen for neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":520581,"journal":{"name":"Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII","volume":"74 8","pages":"273"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-025-04130-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The value of adjuvant immunotherapy in patients with resectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of additional adjuvant immunotherapy in patients with stage III NSCLC.

Methods: Patients with stage III NSCLC who received neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy followed by radical surgery, with or without adjuvant immunotherapy, were retrospectively enrolled across two hospitals. Event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed from the initiation of neoadjuvant treatment and were estimated by the Kaplan‒Meier method. One-to-one propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were used to minimize confounding.

Results: A total of 184 eligible patients were enrolled, of whom 105 (57.1%) received adjuvant immunotherapy and 79 (42.9%) did not. After 1:1 PSM, the addition of adjuvant immunotherapy did not significantly improve EFS (2-year EFS: 62.3% vs. 66.1%, P = 0.653) or OS (2-year OS: 92.7% vs. 89.6%, P = 0.196). Subgroup analyses, stratified by the pathological complete response (pCR) status, further confirmed that adjuvant immunotherapy did not significantly improve survival in either the pCR subgroup or the non-pCR subgroup. Similar results were obtained after IPTW. Exploratory analysis revealed that 3 cycles of neoadjuvant immunotherapy might be more beneficial than 2 (pCR: 40.8% vs. 30.6%, P = 0.292; 2-year EFS: 75.0% vs. 54.5%, P = 0.111) or 4 (pCR: 42.1% vs. 36.8%, P = 0.740; 2-year EFS: 63.2% vs. 51.5%, P = 0.343) cycles.

Conclusion: The addition of adjuvant immunotherapy to neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy may not be necessary in patients with resectable stage III NSCLC. Three cycles of neoadjuvant immunotherapy appear to be an appropriate treatment regimen for neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy.

可切除的III期NSCLC患者在新辅助化疗免疫治疗后是否需要辅助免疫治疗?一个双中心真实世界的研究。
目的:辅助免疫治疗在新辅助化疗免疫治疗后可切除的III期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者中的价值尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估额外辅助免疫治疗对III期NSCLC患者预后的影响。方法:对两家医院的III期非小细胞肺癌患者进行回顾性研究,这些患者接受了新辅助化疗免疫治疗,然后进行了根治性手术,有或没有辅助免疫治疗。从新辅助治疗开始评估无事件生存期(EFS)和总生存期(OS),并通过Kaplan-Meier方法进行估计。使用一对一倾向评分匹配(PSM)和处理加权逆概率(IPTW)来最小化混淆。结果:184例符合条件的患者入组,其中105例(57.1%)接受了辅助免疫治疗,79例(42.9%)未接受辅助免疫治疗。1:1 PSM后,添加辅助免疫治疗并没有显著改善EFS(2年EFS: 62.3% vs. 66.1%, P = 0.653)或OS(2年OS: 92.7% vs. 89.6%, P = 0.196)。亚组分析,根据病理完全反应(pCR)状态分层,进一步证实了辅助免疫治疗在pCR亚组和非pCR亚组中都没有显著提高生存率。IPTW后也得到了类似的结果。探索性分析显示,3个周期的新辅助免疫治疗可能比2个周期更有益(pCR: 40.8% vs. 30.6%, P = 0.292;2年EFS: 75.0%比54.5%,P = 0.111)和4 (pCR: 42.1%比36.8%,P = 0.740;2年EFS: 63.2% vs. 51.5%, P = 0.343)周期。结论:对于可切除的III期非小细胞肺癌患者,在新辅助化疗免疫治疗的基础上增加辅助免疫治疗可能是不必要的。三个周期的新辅助免疫治疗似乎是一个合适的治疗方案的新辅助化疗免疫治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信