Myriam Mellou, Bénédicte Lelièvre, Delphine Bourneau-Martin, Christine Le Beller, Véronique Pizzoglio, Gwenaelle Veyrac, Joelle Michot, François Parant, Marie Briet
{"title":"Drug-induced fluorosis: A study based on the national and international pharmacovigilance databases.","authors":"Myriam Mellou, Bénédicte Lelièvre, Delphine Bourneau-Martin, Christine Le Beller, Véronique Pizzoglio, Gwenaelle Veyrac, Joelle Michot, François Parant, Marie Briet","doi":"10.1016/j.therap.2025.06.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Despite the widespread use of fluorinated medicines - with approximately 20% of the drugs marketed in 2020 containing fluoride compounds - the association between these medications and fluorosis remains under-recognized. This study aimed to identify medications most likely to induce fluorosis in real-world clinical settings using pharmacovigilance databases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A descriptive and disproportionality study was conducted using French national (FPVB) and international pharmacovigilance databases (VigiBase®). Cases of fluorosis were extracted from Vigibase® up to July 8, 2024, using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) preferred terms \"fluorosis\", \"fluoride increased\" and \"fluorosis dental\". French cases were subsequently extracted from the FPVB. Disproportionality signals were evaluated by calculating the reporting odds ratio (ROR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 72 cases of suspected drug-induced fluorosis were identified in VigiBase®. The most frequently reported adverse effects were musculoskeletal disorders (n=39, 54.2%), dental disorders (n=11, 15.3%), and eyes and visual disorders (n=8, 11.1%). Two-third of the cases (n=52) were classified as serious. In 40% of cases (n=29), the outcome was favorable. Voriconazole, sodium fluoride, fluconazole and ciprofloxacin were identified as single suspects. Disproportionality signals were detected for sodium fluoride (ROR=2305.7; 95% CI [1143.9; 4647.3]), voriconazole (ROR=1415.4; 95% CI [891.5; 2247.3]), fluconazole (ROR=110.4; 95% CI [52.9; 230.3]), fludarabine (ROR=87.3; 95% CI [31.8; 239.3]) and ciprofloxacin (ROR=7.1; 95% CI [2.2; 22.4]). The 16 cases from the FPVB provided more detailed information, including the clinical context - mainly hematological malignancies (37.5%) and organ transplants (12.5%) - the median time to onset (361 days), mean plasma fluoride concentration (1.33mg/L; range 0.006-7.2mg/L), and results imaging explorations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights pharmacovigilance signals suggesting a potential association between fluorosis and certain fluorinated compounds, particularly sodium fluoride, voriconazole, fluconazole, fludarabine and ciprofloxacin. Among these, only sodium fluoride and voriconazole include fluorosis in the summary of product characteristics. Clinicians should remain vigilant regarding this potential adverse drug reaction, especially with long-term use of these medications.</p>","PeriodicalId":23147,"journal":{"name":"Therapie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.therap.2025.06.006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Despite the widespread use of fluorinated medicines - with approximately 20% of the drugs marketed in 2020 containing fluoride compounds - the association between these medications and fluorosis remains under-recognized. This study aimed to identify medications most likely to induce fluorosis in real-world clinical settings using pharmacovigilance databases.
Methods: A descriptive and disproportionality study was conducted using French national (FPVB) and international pharmacovigilance databases (VigiBase®). Cases of fluorosis were extracted from Vigibase® up to July 8, 2024, using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) preferred terms "fluorosis", "fluoride increased" and "fluorosis dental". French cases were subsequently extracted from the FPVB. Disproportionality signals were evaluated by calculating the reporting odds ratio (ROR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI).
Results: A total of 72 cases of suspected drug-induced fluorosis were identified in VigiBase®. The most frequently reported adverse effects were musculoskeletal disorders (n=39, 54.2%), dental disorders (n=11, 15.3%), and eyes and visual disorders (n=8, 11.1%). Two-third of the cases (n=52) were classified as serious. In 40% of cases (n=29), the outcome was favorable. Voriconazole, sodium fluoride, fluconazole and ciprofloxacin were identified as single suspects. Disproportionality signals were detected for sodium fluoride (ROR=2305.7; 95% CI [1143.9; 4647.3]), voriconazole (ROR=1415.4; 95% CI [891.5; 2247.3]), fluconazole (ROR=110.4; 95% CI [52.9; 230.3]), fludarabine (ROR=87.3; 95% CI [31.8; 239.3]) and ciprofloxacin (ROR=7.1; 95% CI [2.2; 22.4]). The 16 cases from the FPVB provided more detailed information, including the clinical context - mainly hematological malignancies (37.5%) and organ transplants (12.5%) - the median time to onset (361 days), mean plasma fluoride concentration (1.33mg/L; range 0.006-7.2mg/L), and results imaging explorations.
Conclusion: This study highlights pharmacovigilance signals suggesting a potential association between fluorosis and certain fluorinated compounds, particularly sodium fluoride, voriconazole, fluconazole, fludarabine and ciprofloxacin. Among these, only sodium fluoride and voriconazole include fluorosis in the summary of product characteristics. Clinicians should remain vigilant regarding this potential adverse drug reaction, especially with long-term use of these medications.
目标:尽管含氟药物被广泛使用——2020年上市的药物中约有20%含有氟化物——但这些药物与氟中毒之间的关系仍未得到充分认识。本研究旨在利用药物警戒数据库确定在现实世界的临床环境中最有可能诱发氟中毒的药物。方法:使用法国国家(FPVB)和国际药物警戒数据库(VigiBase®)进行描述性和歧化研究。从Vigibase®中提取到2024年7月8日的氟中毒病例,使用监管活动医学词典(MedDRA)首选术语“氟中毒”、“氟化物增加”和“牙齿氟中毒”。法国病例随后从FPVB中取出。通过计算报告优势比(ROR)和相应的95%置信区间(CI)来评估歧化信号。结果:在VigiBase®中共鉴定出72例疑似药物性氟中毒病例。最常见的不良反应是肌肉骨骼疾病(n=39, 54.2%)、牙齿疾病(n=11, 15.3%)和眼睛和视觉疾病(n=8, 11.1%)。2 / 3的病例(n=52)为严重病例。在40%的病例(n=29)中,结果是有利的。伏立康唑、氟化钠、氟康唑和环丙沙星为单一可疑物。氟化钠检测到歧化信号(ROR=2305.7;95% ci [1143.9;[4647.3]),伏立康唑(ROR=1415.4;95% ci [891.5;[2247.3])、氟康唑(ROR=110.4;95% ci [52.9;230.3])、氟达拉滨(ROR=87.3;95% ci [31.8;[239.3])和环丙沙星(ROR=7.1;95% ci [2.2;22.4])。来自FPVB的16例病例提供了更详细的信息,包括临床情况-主要是血液系统恶性肿瘤(37.5%)和器官移植(12.5%)-发病的中位时间(361天),平均血浆氟化物浓度(1.33mg/L);0.006-7.2mg/L),结果为成像探查。结论:本研究强调了药物警戒信号,提示氟中毒与某些含氟化合物,特别是氟化钠、伏立康唑、氟康唑、氟达拉滨和环丙沙星之间存在潜在关联。其中只有氟化钠和伏立康唑在产品特性总结中包含氟中毒。临床医生应该对这种潜在的药物不良反应保持警惕,特别是长期使用这些药物。
期刊介绍:
Thérapie is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to Clinical Pharmacology, Therapeutics, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacovigilance, Addictovigilance, Social Pharmacology, Pharmacoepidemiology, Pharmacoeconomics and Evidence-Based-Medicine. Thérapie publishes in French or in English original articles, general reviews, letters to the editor reporting original findings, correspondence relating to articles or letters published in the Journal, short articles, editorials on up-to-date topics, Pharmacovigilance or Addictovigilance reports that follow the French "guidelines" concerning good practice in pharmacovigilance publications. The journal also publishes thematic issues on topical subject.
The journal is indexed in the main international data bases and notably in: Biosis Previews/Biological Abstracts, Embase/Excerpta Medica, Medline/Index Medicus, Science Citation Index.