Development and validation of an administrative claims measure of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) triage quality for mobile integrated health interventions.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Nicole Voll, Cameron Gettel, Shu-Xia Li, Li Qin, Yixin Li, Sarah Attanasio, Isabella Epshtein, Marvin Nichols, Alexis Lilly, Jacob Quinton, Susannah Bernheim, Hannah Stiles, Karthik Murugiah, N Clay Mann, Arjun Venkatesh
{"title":"Development and validation of an administrative claims measure of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) triage quality for mobile integrated health interventions.","authors":"Nicole Voll, Cameron Gettel, Shu-Xia Li, Li Qin, Yixin Li, Sarah Attanasio, Isabella Epshtein, Marvin Nichols, Alexis Lilly, Jacob Quinton, Susannah Bernheim, Hannah Stiles, Karthik Murugiah, N Clay Mann, Arjun Venkatesh","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2025.2535574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In general, Medicare pays for emergency ground ambulance services when a patient is transported to the nearest emergency department (ED) or other select facilities. As state and local agencies strive to provide high quality person-centered emergency care in locations outside the ED, there is a need for a reliable and valid prehospital quality measure to ensure patient safety. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation Center's Emergency Triage, Treat and Transport (ET3) Model created a unique opportunity to develop a quality measure for ambulance organizations to measure safe and effective prehospital care. Our objective was to develop and validate the Risk Adjusted Post-Ambulance Provider Triage ED Visit Rate Measure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The measure was developed using 2021-2023 Medicare Part B fee-for-service administrative and claims data from 67 ambulance organizations that participated in the ET3 Model, triaging patients using predetermined clinical protocols. The measure cohort included patients that were either transported to an alternative destination (TAD), such as urgent care, or provided treatment in place (TIP). The measure outcome was met if the patient subsequently had an ED visit or died within three days of a TAD/TIP encounter, as an inverse measure, lower is better. We calculated a risk-adjusted measure score using a hierarchical generalized linear model approach, adjusting for patient-level variables and calculating model and measure performance. Finally, we assessed measure face validity and construct validity. To ensure measure reliability, some results were examined using a minimum case threshold of 20 TAD/TIP encounters by each ambulance organization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 22 ambulance organizations that met the minimum case volume threshold, the mean, SD measure score was 20.3 (5.3), ranging from 11.6 to 35.4. The mean (SD) reliability signal-to-noise ratio was 0.791 (0.124). Nine of 11 (82%) members of an interested party consensus group provided a positive vote of face validity. Construct validity was demonstrated by identifying an anticipated negative correlation with three relevant prehospital measures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Risk Adjusted Post-Ambulance Provider Triage ED Visit Rate Measure is a reliable and valid measure that fills a critical gap in assessing patient safety in prehospital care in the United States.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prehospital Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2025.2535574","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: In general, Medicare pays for emergency ground ambulance services when a patient is transported to the nearest emergency department (ED) or other select facilities. As state and local agencies strive to provide high quality person-centered emergency care in locations outside the ED, there is a need for a reliable and valid prehospital quality measure to ensure patient safety. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation Center's Emergency Triage, Treat and Transport (ET3) Model created a unique opportunity to develop a quality measure for ambulance organizations to measure safe and effective prehospital care. Our objective was to develop and validate the Risk Adjusted Post-Ambulance Provider Triage ED Visit Rate Measure.

Methods: The measure was developed using 2021-2023 Medicare Part B fee-for-service administrative and claims data from 67 ambulance organizations that participated in the ET3 Model, triaging patients using predetermined clinical protocols. The measure cohort included patients that were either transported to an alternative destination (TAD), such as urgent care, or provided treatment in place (TIP). The measure outcome was met if the patient subsequently had an ED visit or died within three days of a TAD/TIP encounter, as an inverse measure, lower is better. We calculated a risk-adjusted measure score using a hierarchical generalized linear model approach, adjusting for patient-level variables and calculating model and measure performance. Finally, we assessed measure face validity and construct validity. To ensure measure reliability, some results were examined using a minimum case threshold of 20 TAD/TIP encounters by each ambulance organization.

Results: Among the 22 ambulance organizations that met the minimum case volume threshold, the mean, SD measure score was 20.3 (5.3), ranging from 11.6 to 35.4. The mean (SD) reliability signal-to-noise ratio was 0.791 (0.124). Nine of 11 (82%) members of an interested party consensus group provided a positive vote of face validity. Construct validity was demonstrated by identifying an anticipated negative correlation with three relevant prehospital measures.

Conclusions: The Risk Adjusted Post-Ambulance Provider Triage ED Visit Rate Measure is a reliable and valid measure that fills a critical gap in assessing patient safety in prehospital care in the United States.

针对流动综合卫生干预措施的紧急医疗服务(EMS)分诊质量的行政索赔措施的开发和验证。
目的:一般来说,当病人被运送到最近的急诊室(ED)或其他选定的设施时,医疗保险支付紧急地面救护车服务。随着州和地方机构努力在急诊室以外的地方提供高质量的以人为本的紧急护理,需要一种可靠有效的院前质量措施来确保患者安全。医疗保险中心和医疗补助创新中心的紧急分类、治疗和运输(ET3)模型为救护车组织开发质量衡量标准创造了一个独特的机会,以衡量安全和有效的院前护理。我们的目标是开发和验证风险调整后救护车提供者分类急诊科访问率测量。方法:该措施是根据参与ET3模型的67个救护车组织的2021-2023年医疗保险B部分服务收费管理和索赔数据制定的,使用预定的临床方案对患者进行分类。测量队列包括被运送到替代目的地(TAD)的患者,如紧急护理,或提供就地治疗(TIP)。如果患者随后去了急诊科或在TAD/TIP遭遇后三天内死亡,则达到了测量结果,作为相反的测量,越低越好。我们使用分层广义线性模型方法计算风险调整后的测量得分,调整患者水平变量,计算模型和测量性能。最后,我们评估了测量面效度和结构效度。为了确保测量的可靠性,使用每个救护车组织20次TAD/TIP遭遇的最小病例阈值来检查一些结果。结果:在满足最小病例量阈值的22个救护机构中,平均SD测量得分为20.3(5.3),范围为11.6 ~ 35.4。信噪比均值(SD)为0.791(0.124)。利益相关方共识小组的11名成员中有9名(82%)对面孔有效性投了积极的一票。通过确定三个相关院前措施的预期负相关来证明结构效度。结论:风险调整后救护车提供者分类急诊科就诊率测量是一种可靠和有效的测量,填补了评估美国院前护理患者安全的关键空白。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Prehospital Emergency Care
Prehospital Emergency Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
137
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Prehospital Emergency Care publishes peer-reviewed information relevant to the practice, educational advancement, and investigation of prehospital emergency care, including the following types of articles: Special Contributions - Original Articles - Education and Practice - Preliminary Reports - Case Conferences - Position Papers - Collective Reviews - Editorials - Letters to the Editor - Media Reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信