Advancing Health Equity in Europe: Explore, Tailor, Implement, and Evaluate (ETIE)-A Framework of Diversity and Fairness in Pharmacoepidemiologic Research.
Enriqueta Vallejo-Yagüe, Sieta T de Vries, Daniel La Parra-Casado, Helga Gardarsdottir, Maria Luisa Faquetti, Irene van Valkengoed, Elodie Aubrun, Antonios Douros, Sandra Guedes, Adrian Martinez-De La Torre, Jakob Wested, Taichi Ochi, Anne Marie Schumacher Dimech, Carole Clair, Isha Mehta, Fidelia Ida, Montse Soriano Gabarró, Oleksii Korzh, María Martínez-González, Ariadna Maso, Diana Clamote Rodrigues, Jackie R Ndem-Galbert, Marta Korjagina, Swarnali Goswami, Daniela C Moga, Andrea Fleisch Marcus, Hedvig Nordeng
{"title":"Advancing Health Equity in Europe: Explore, Tailor, Implement, and Evaluate (ETIE)-A Framework of Diversity and Fairness in Pharmacoepidemiologic Research.","authors":"Enriqueta Vallejo-Yagüe, Sieta T de Vries, Daniel La Parra-Casado, Helga Gardarsdottir, Maria Luisa Faquetti, Irene van Valkengoed, Elodie Aubrun, Antonios Douros, Sandra Guedes, Adrian Martinez-De La Torre, Jakob Wested, Taichi Ochi, Anne Marie Schumacher Dimech, Carole Clair, Isha Mehta, Fidelia Ida, Montse Soriano Gabarró, Oleksii Korzh, María Martínez-González, Ariadna Maso, Diana Clamote Rodrigues, Jackie R Ndem-Galbert, Marta Korjagina, Swarnali Goswami, Daniela C Moga, Andrea Fleisch Marcus, Hedvig Nordeng","doi":"10.1002/pds.70175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pharmacoepidemiology should represent and benefit populations equitably, embracing diversity and equity, and ensuring fairness. This article describes equity and fairness in pharmacoepidemiology, depicts key diversity domains, and provides an operational framework and call for action to implement diversity and fairness in pharmacoepidemiologic research. To ensure fairness, studies should address diversity and inclusion while providing equal opportunities and benefits for everyone in the target population. To implement and evaluate fairness in pharmacoepidemiology, we defined the following diversity domains: biological sex, socially constructed gender, age, life stages (e.g., pregnancy, menopause), ethnicity, race, migration, nationality, socioeconomic status, education, health literacy, and health status and capabilities. These are determinants of health, either through biological pathways or through social norms, discrimination, and barriers to healthcare or research participation. They are interlinked, their impact is study- and context-specific, and due to their sensitive and evolving nature, they should be handled with caution. Implementing diversity domains enables researchers to assess the generalizability of findings, identify and address health inequities, account for determinants of health, and ensure the fairness of algorithms, implementations, and recommendations. To successfully implement diversity domains and ensure fair pharmacoepidemiologic research, we recommend researchers to follow the Explore, Tailor, Implement, and Evaluate (ETIE) framework: Explore the role/implication of the diversity domains in the study, tailor their definitions to the study context, implement them appropriately and evaluate the study findings in their context. Increased availability of diversity data is needed, and support from stakeholders is essential. This manuscript was endorsed by the International Society for Pharmacoepidemiology (ISPE).</p>","PeriodicalId":19782,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","volume":"34 7","pages":"e70175"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.70175","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Pharmacoepidemiology should represent and benefit populations equitably, embracing diversity and equity, and ensuring fairness. This article describes equity and fairness in pharmacoepidemiology, depicts key diversity domains, and provides an operational framework and call for action to implement diversity and fairness in pharmacoepidemiologic research. To ensure fairness, studies should address diversity and inclusion while providing equal opportunities and benefits for everyone in the target population. To implement and evaluate fairness in pharmacoepidemiology, we defined the following diversity domains: biological sex, socially constructed gender, age, life stages (e.g., pregnancy, menopause), ethnicity, race, migration, nationality, socioeconomic status, education, health literacy, and health status and capabilities. These are determinants of health, either through biological pathways or through social norms, discrimination, and barriers to healthcare or research participation. They are interlinked, their impact is study- and context-specific, and due to their sensitive and evolving nature, they should be handled with caution. Implementing diversity domains enables researchers to assess the generalizability of findings, identify and address health inequities, account for determinants of health, and ensure the fairness of algorithms, implementations, and recommendations. To successfully implement diversity domains and ensure fair pharmacoepidemiologic research, we recommend researchers to follow the Explore, Tailor, Implement, and Evaluate (ETIE) framework: Explore the role/implication of the diversity domains in the study, tailor their definitions to the study context, implement them appropriately and evaluate the study findings in their context. Increased availability of diversity data is needed, and support from stakeholders is essential. This manuscript was endorsed by the International Society for Pharmacoepidemiology (ISPE).
期刊介绍:
The aim of Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety is to provide an international forum for the communication and evaluation of data, methods and opinion in the discipline of pharmacoepidemiology. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed reports of original research, invited reviews and a variety of guest editorials and commentaries embracing scientific, medical, statistical, legal and economic aspects of pharmacoepidemiology and post-marketing surveillance of drug safety. Appropriate material in these categories may also be considered for publication as a Brief Report.
Particular areas of interest include:
design, analysis, results, and interpretation of studies looking at the benefit or safety of specific pharmaceuticals, biologics, or medical devices, including studies in pharmacovigilance, postmarketing surveillance, pharmacoeconomics, patient safety, molecular pharmacoepidemiology, or any other study within the broad field of pharmacoepidemiology;
comparative effectiveness research relating to pharmaceuticals, biologics, and medical devices. Comparative effectiveness research is the generation and synthesis of evidence that compares the benefits and harms of alternative methods to prevent, diagnose, treat, and monitor a clinical condition, as these methods are truly used in the real world;
methodologic contributions of relevance to pharmacoepidemiology, whether original contributions, reviews of existing methods, or tutorials for how to apply the methods of pharmacoepidemiology;
assessments of harm versus benefit in drug therapy;
patterns of drug utilization;
relationships between pharmacoepidemiology and the formulation and interpretation of regulatory guidelines;
evaluations of risk management plans and programmes relating to pharmaceuticals, biologics and medical devices.