The Effect of Trauma History and Symptom Duration on Repair Integrity in 2335 Consecutive Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repairs.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Pub Date : 2025-07-18 eCollection Date: 2025-07-01 DOI:10.1177/23259671251355125
Christyon Hayek, Patrick H Lam, Ala' Fayeq Mohamed Hawa, James P Bilbrough, George A C Murrell
{"title":"The Effect of Trauma History and Symptom Duration on Repair Integrity in 2335 Consecutive Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repairs.","authors":"Christyon Hayek, Patrick H Lam, Ala' Fayeq Mohamed Hawa, James P Bilbrough, George A C Murrell","doi":"10.1177/23259671251355125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Few studies have assessed the impact of trauma history and preoperative symptom duration on cuff integrity after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR).</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the hypothesis that acute, traumatic rotator cuff tears are less likely to retear after arthroscopic RCR compared with chronic, atraumatic tears.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a post hoc analysis of prospectively collected data for 2335 consecutive patients who underwent primary arthroscopic RCR and were evaluated for retear on ultrasound 6 months postoperatively. A single-row knotless repair technique was used for all patients. The cohort was divided into patients who recalled a specific event that instigated their symptoms (\"traumatic\" group) and those who did not (\"atraumatic\" group). Chi-square test was utilized to assess the difference in retear rate between the traumatic and atraumatic groups. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of retear, and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to evaluate the accuracy of the regression equations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The traumatic and atraumatic groups consisted of 1489 and 846 patients, respectively. There was no significant difference in retear rate between the traumatic and atraumatic groups (13% and 11%, respectively; <i>P</i> = .14). In the entire cohort, trauma history and preoperative symptom duration were not predictive of retear. In the traumatic group, larger tear size area was the strongest independent predictor of retear (area under the curve [AUC], 0.76; 99% CI, 0.70-81), followed by longer operative time (AUC, 0.69; 99% CI, 0.64-0.74), older patient age (AUC, 0.68; 99% CI, 0.63-0.73) and full-thickness tear (AUC, 0.66; 99% CI, 0.61-0.71). In the atraumatic group, larger tear size area was the strongest independent predictor (AUC, 0.76; 99% CI, 0.68-0.83), followed by older patient age (AUC, 0.67; 99% CI, 0.59-0.75) and full-thickness tear (AUC, 0.66; 99% CI, 0.58-0.73).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Trauma history and preoperative symptom duration did not affect cuff integrity 6 months after arthroscopic RCR. More important factors associated with enhanced repair integrity included smaller tear size and younger patient age.</p>","PeriodicalId":19646,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"13 7","pages":"23259671251355125"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12276491/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671251355125","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Few studies have assessed the impact of trauma history and preoperative symptom duration on cuff integrity after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR).

Purpose: To assess the hypothesis that acute, traumatic rotator cuff tears are less likely to retear after arthroscopic RCR compared with chronic, atraumatic tears.

Study design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods: We conducted a post hoc analysis of prospectively collected data for 2335 consecutive patients who underwent primary arthroscopic RCR and were evaluated for retear on ultrasound 6 months postoperatively. A single-row knotless repair technique was used for all patients. The cohort was divided into patients who recalled a specific event that instigated their symptoms ("traumatic" group) and those who did not ("atraumatic" group). Chi-square test was utilized to assess the difference in retear rate between the traumatic and atraumatic groups. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of retear, and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to evaluate the accuracy of the regression equations.

Results: The traumatic and atraumatic groups consisted of 1489 and 846 patients, respectively. There was no significant difference in retear rate between the traumatic and atraumatic groups (13% and 11%, respectively; P = .14). In the entire cohort, trauma history and preoperative symptom duration were not predictive of retear. In the traumatic group, larger tear size area was the strongest independent predictor of retear (area under the curve [AUC], 0.76; 99% CI, 0.70-81), followed by longer operative time (AUC, 0.69; 99% CI, 0.64-0.74), older patient age (AUC, 0.68; 99% CI, 0.63-0.73) and full-thickness tear (AUC, 0.66; 99% CI, 0.61-0.71). In the atraumatic group, larger tear size area was the strongest independent predictor (AUC, 0.76; 99% CI, 0.68-0.83), followed by older patient age (AUC, 0.67; 99% CI, 0.59-0.75) and full-thickness tear (AUC, 0.66; 99% CI, 0.58-0.73).

Conclusion: Trauma history and preoperative symptom duration did not affect cuff integrity 6 months after arthroscopic RCR. More important factors associated with enhanced repair integrity included smaller tear size and younger patient age.

创伤史和症状持续时间对2335例连续关节镜下肩袖修复完整性的影响。
背景:很少有研究评估创伤史和术前症状持续时间对关节镜下肩袖修复(RCR)后袖完整性的影响。目的:评估关节镜下RCR术后急性外伤性肩袖撕裂较慢性非外伤性撕裂更不容易再撕裂的假设。研究设计:队列研究;证据水平,3。方法:我们对2335例连续接受原发性关节镜RCR的患者进行了前瞻性数据分析,并在术后6个月进行了超声评估。所有患者均采用单排无结修复技术。该队列被分为回忆起引起其症状的特定事件的患者(“创伤”组)和没有回忆起引起其症状的患者(“非创伤”组)。采用卡方检验评估创伤组和非创伤组的复发率差异。采用多因素logistic回归分析确定复发的独立预测因素,采用受试者工作特征曲线分析评价回归方程的准确性。结果:创伤组1489例,非创伤组846例。创伤组和非创伤组的复发率差异无统计学意义(分别为13%和11%;P = .14)。在整个队列中,创伤史和术前症状持续时间不能预测复发。在创伤组中,较大的撕裂面积是再撕裂的最强独立预测因子(曲线下面积[AUC], 0.76;99% CI, 0.70-81),其次是更长的手术时间(AUC, 0.69;99% CI, 0.64-0.74),患者年龄较大(AUC, 0.68;99% CI, 0.63-0.73)和全层撕裂(AUC, 0.66;99% ci, 0.61-0.71)。在非创伤组,较大的撕裂面积是最强的独立预测因子(AUC, 0.76;99% CI, 0.68-0.83),其次是年龄较大的患者(AUC, 0.67;99% CI, 0.59-0.75)和全层撕裂(AUC, 0.66;99% ci, 0.58-0.73)。结论:创伤史和术前症状持续时间对关节镜RCR术后6个月的袖带完整性无影响。与修复完整性增强相关的更重要因素包括更小的撕裂大小和更年轻的患者年龄。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
876
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine (OJSM), developed by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM), is a global, peer-reviewed, open access journal that combines the interests of researchers and clinical practitioners across orthopaedic sports medicine, arthroscopy, and knee arthroplasty. Topics include original research in the areas of: -Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, including surgical and nonsurgical treatment of orthopaedic sports injuries -Arthroscopic Surgery (Shoulder/Elbow/Wrist/Hip/Knee/Ankle/Foot) -Relevant translational research -Sports traumatology/epidemiology -Knee and shoulder arthroplasty The OJSM also publishes relevant systematic reviews and meta-analyses. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信