Optimizing Oncology Generic Medication Selection in the Gulf Region: Expert Consensus and MCDA Tool Development.

IF 2.3 Q2 ECONOMICS
Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research Pub Date : 2025-07-18 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.36469/001c.140955
Anas Hamad, Omar AbdulAziz, Osama Abu Tabar, Sara Al Balushi, Sana Alblooshi, Mohamad Alfar, Eren Dawoud, Fahmeeda Khan, Abdulrahman Nabeel, Wael Sayam, Ahmad ElSheashaey
{"title":"Optimizing Oncology Generic Medication Selection in the Gulf Region: Expert Consensus and MCDA Tool Development.","authors":"Anas Hamad, Omar AbdulAziz, Osama Abu Tabar, Sara Al Balushi, Sana Alblooshi, Mohamad Alfar, Eren Dawoud, Fahmeeda Khan, Abdulrahman Nabeel, Wael Sayam, Ahmad ElSheashaey","doi":"10.36469/001c.140955","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Cancer remains a leading global health challenge, with high mortality rates and increasing financial burdens on healthcare systems. In the Gulf Cooperation Council countries, generic oncology medications offer a cost-effective alternative to patented treatments. However, disparities in regulatory frameworks and concerns about quality and supply reliability hinder their widespread adoption. Addressing these challenges is crucial to ensuring optimal access to oncology treatments. <b>Methods:</b> This study employed multicriteria decision analysis to evaluate key factors influencing the selection of off-patent oncology drugs. A structured survey was conducted among 10 formulary management experts from the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Kuwait, Bahrain, and Oman. Participants engaged in a 3-hour workshop to assess and prioritize critical decision-making criteria through guided discussions, case studies, and weighting surveys. <b>Results:</b> The analysis identified manufacturing quality (30.8%), cost (20%), and use in reference countries (14.6%) as the most critical factors in selecting generic oncology mediations. Supply reliability (13%), regulatory aspects (8%), and pharmacovigilance services and extra services (6.8% each) also played supporting roles. The structured evaluation framework developed through this study provides insights into the factors shaping formulary decisions in the Gulf Cooperation Council region and highlights areas requiring regulatory and logistical improvements. <b>Conclusion:</b> This expert consensus underscores the need for a balanced approach that ensures quality, affordability, and accessibility in adopting oncology generics. Strengthening regulatory frameworks, improving pharmacovigilance, and enhancing stakeholder education are essential steps to optimizing the integration of oncology drugs into regional healthcare systems. These findings provide a foundation for policy recommendations aimed at improving generic drug adoption and patient outcomes in oncology care.</p>","PeriodicalId":16012,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research","volume":"12 2","pages":"21-26"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12276732/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36469/001c.140955","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cancer remains a leading global health challenge, with high mortality rates and increasing financial burdens on healthcare systems. In the Gulf Cooperation Council countries, generic oncology medications offer a cost-effective alternative to patented treatments. However, disparities in regulatory frameworks and concerns about quality and supply reliability hinder their widespread adoption. Addressing these challenges is crucial to ensuring optimal access to oncology treatments. Methods: This study employed multicriteria decision analysis to evaluate key factors influencing the selection of off-patent oncology drugs. A structured survey was conducted among 10 formulary management experts from the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Kuwait, Bahrain, and Oman. Participants engaged in a 3-hour workshop to assess and prioritize critical decision-making criteria through guided discussions, case studies, and weighting surveys. Results: The analysis identified manufacturing quality (30.8%), cost (20%), and use in reference countries (14.6%) as the most critical factors in selecting generic oncology mediations. Supply reliability (13%), regulatory aspects (8%), and pharmacovigilance services and extra services (6.8% each) also played supporting roles. The structured evaluation framework developed through this study provides insights into the factors shaping formulary decisions in the Gulf Cooperation Council region and highlights areas requiring regulatory and logistical improvements. Conclusion: This expert consensus underscores the need for a balanced approach that ensures quality, affordability, and accessibility in adopting oncology generics. Strengthening regulatory frameworks, improving pharmacovigilance, and enhancing stakeholder education are essential steps to optimizing the integration of oncology drugs into regional healthcare systems. These findings provide a foundation for policy recommendations aimed at improving generic drug adoption and patient outcomes in oncology care.

优化海湾地区肿瘤仿制药选择:专家共识和MCDA工具开发。
背景:癌症仍然是一个主要的全球卫生挑战,死亡率高,卫生保健系统的财政负担越来越重。在海湾合作委员会(Gulf Cooperation Council)国家,非专利肿瘤药物为专利治疗提供了一种具有成本效益的替代方案。然而,监管框架的差异以及对质量和供应可靠性的担忧阻碍了它们的广泛采用。解决这些挑战对于确保肿瘤治疗的最佳可及性至关重要。方法:采用多标准决策分析方法,对影响非专利肿瘤药物选择的关键因素进行评价。对阿拉伯联合酋长国、卡塔尔、科威特、巴林、阿曼的10名处方管理专家进行了结构化调查。参与者参加了一个3小时的研讨会,通过指导讨论、案例研究和加权调查来评估和优先考虑关键的决策标准。结果:分析认为,生产质量(30.8%)、成本(20%)和参考国使用情况(14.6%)是选择非专利肿瘤药物的最关键因素。供应可靠性(13%)、监管方面(8%)、药物警戒服务和额外服务(各6.8%)也发挥了辅助作用。通过本研究开发的结构化评估框架提供了对海湾合作委员会地区形成公式决策的因素的见解,并突出了需要改进监管和后勤的领域。结论:这一专家共识强调了采用平衡方法以确保肿瘤仿制药的质量、可负担性和可及性的必要性。加强监管框架,改善药物警戒,加强利益相关者教育是优化肿瘤药物整合到区域卫生保健系统的必要步骤。这些发现为旨在改善肿瘤治疗中仿制药的采用和患者预后的政策建议提供了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信