Can Peritumoral Radiomics Based on MRI Predict the Microvascular Invasion Status of Combined Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Cholangiocarcinoma Before Surgery?

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Pub Date : 2025-07-16 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JHC.S515651
Le Guo, Chantao Huang, Peng Hao, Ningyang Jia, Ling Zhang
{"title":"Can Peritumoral Radiomics Based on MRI Predict the Microvascular Invasion Status of Combined Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Cholangiocarcinoma Before Surgery?","authors":"Le Guo, Chantao Huang, Peng Hao, Ningyang Jia, Ling Zhang","doi":"10.2147/JHC.S515651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the role of MRI peritumoral imaging in predicting microvascular invasion (MVI) status in patients with combined hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical and pathological data and MRI images of 118 patients with surgically resected and pathologically confirmed cHCC-CCA were retrospectively collected. The tumor in MRI images was segmented by ITK-SNAP software in three dimensions and extended 1 centimeter(cm) towards the tumor periphery. Then, the Python open-source platform was used for radiomics analysis. Mutual information and recursive elimination methods were used to select the optimal features. Clinical models and radiomics models were constructed based on six classifiers. The model's effectiveness was comprehensively evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC), area under curve (AUC), and decision curve analysis (DCA), and the model results were output using Shapley Additive exPlans (SHAP).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The differences in HBeAg, capsule, target sign, and lymph node metastasis between MVI negative and positive groups were statistically significant (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Based on peritumoral, 1cm fusion model (in arterial phase) has an AUC of 0.940 (95% CI: 0.801-0.947) and 0.825 (95% CI: 0.633-0.917) in the training/testing set when identifying the MVI status of cHCC-CCA. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity in the testing set are 0.778, 0.800, and 0.726, respectively. The DCA shows that when the threshold is approximately 11.08%-66.47%, the net return of the fusion model is higher than that of the clinical and radiomics models under the same conditions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Radiomics with a 1cm extension around the tumor can improve the performance of machine-learning models in predicting MVI labels.</p>","PeriodicalId":15906,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma","volume":"12 ","pages":"1441-1452"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12276744/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JHC.S515651","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the role of MRI peritumoral imaging in predicting microvascular invasion (MVI) status in patients with combined hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA).

Methods: Clinical and pathological data and MRI images of 118 patients with surgically resected and pathologically confirmed cHCC-CCA were retrospectively collected. The tumor in MRI images was segmented by ITK-SNAP software in three dimensions and extended 1 centimeter(cm) towards the tumor periphery. Then, the Python open-source platform was used for radiomics analysis. Mutual information and recursive elimination methods were used to select the optimal features. Clinical models and radiomics models were constructed based on six classifiers. The model's effectiveness was comprehensively evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC), area under curve (AUC), and decision curve analysis (DCA), and the model results were output using Shapley Additive exPlans (SHAP).

Results: The differences in HBeAg, capsule, target sign, and lymph node metastasis between MVI negative and positive groups were statistically significant (p < 0.05). Based on peritumoral, 1cm fusion model (in arterial phase) has an AUC of 0.940 (95% CI: 0.801-0.947) and 0.825 (95% CI: 0.633-0.917) in the training/testing set when identifying the MVI status of cHCC-CCA. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity in the testing set are 0.778, 0.800, and 0.726, respectively. The DCA shows that when the threshold is approximately 11.08%-66.47%, the net return of the fusion model is higher than that of the clinical and radiomics models under the same conditions.

Conclusion: Radiomics with a 1cm extension around the tumor can improve the performance of machine-learning models in predicting MVI labels.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

基于MRI的瘤周放射组学能否预测肝细胞癌合并胆管癌术前微血管侵袭状况?
目的:探讨MRI瘤周成像在预测肝细胞癌合并胆管癌(cHCC-CCA)患者微血管侵犯(MVI)状况中的作用。方法:回顾性收集118例手术切除并经病理证实的cHCC-CCA患者的临床、病理资料及MRI影像。通过ITK-SNAP软件对MRI图像中的肿瘤进行三维分割,并向肿瘤周围延伸1厘米(cm)。然后,使用Python开源平台进行放射组学分析。采用互信息法和递归消去法选择最优特征。基于6个分类构建临床模型和放射组学模型。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)、曲线下面积(AUC)和决策曲线分析(DCA)综合评价模型的有效性,并使用Shapley Additive exPlans (SHAP)输出模型结果。结果:MVI阴性组与阳性组HBeAg、包膜、靶征、淋巴结转移差异均有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。基于肿瘤周围,1cm融合模型(动脉期)识别cHCC-CCA MVI状态的训练/测试集AUC分别为0.940 (95% CI: 0.801-0.947)和0.825 (95% CI: 0.633-0.917)。检测集的准确率为0.778,灵敏度为0.800,特异度为0.726。DCA表明,当阈值约为11.08% ~ 66.47%时,融合模型的净收益高于相同条件下的临床和放射组学模型。结论:肿瘤周围延伸1cm的放射组学可以提高机器学习模型预测MVI标记的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
2.40%
发文量
108
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信