Effect of pretreatment vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitor use on the safety and efficacy of trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Koshiro Fukuda, Hiroki Osumi, Akira Ooki, Daisaku Kamiimabeppu, Shohei Udagawa, Shota Fukuoka, Mariko Ogura, Takeru Wakatsuki, Keisho Chin, Mitsuhiro Fujishiro, Kensei Yamaguchi, Eiji Shinozaki
{"title":"Effect of pretreatment vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitor use on the safety and efficacy of trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.","authors":"Koshiro Fukuda, Hiroki Osumi, Akira Ooki, Daisaku Kamiimabeppu, Shohei Udagawa, Shota Fukuoka, Mariko Ogura, Takeru Wakatsuki, Keisho Chin, Mitsuhiro Fujishiro, Kensei Yamaguchi, Eiji Shinozaki","doi":"10.1007/s10147-025-02831-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The effect of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitor pretreatment on clinical outcomes of trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) plus bevacizumab (BEV) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) remains unclear. We aimed to investigate this effect.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with mCRC treated with FTD/TPI plus BEV were retrospectively enrolled. Disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs) were compared. In total, 73, 50, and 33 patients were treated with fluorouracil+levofolinate calcium+irinotecan (FOLFIRI) plus BEV, ramucirumab, and aflibercept, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The DCR and median PFS/OS did not significantly differ among the groups (DCR: 54.8% vs. 56.0% vs. 42.4%, P = 0.43; PFS: 3.9 vs. 4.6 vs. 3.7 months, P = 0.45; OS: 12.0 vs. 9.5 vs. 11.9 months, P = 0.28). The most common grade 3-4 AE was neutropenia. The incidence of grade 3-4 AEs did not significantly differ among the groups. The frequency of grade ≥2 proteinuria during FTD/TPI plus BEV treatment was significantly higher in patients with grade ≥2 proteinuria before FOLFIRI plus VEGF inhibitor use than in those without proteinuria. Multivariate analysis revealed poor performance status (ECOG PS) and liver metastasis as independent predictors of short PFS/OS (ECOG PS, PFS: P = 0.021, OS: P < 0.001; liver metastasis, PFS: P = 0.03, OS: P < 0.001) and grade 3-4 neutropenia in a month as a predictor of long PFS/OS (PFS: P = 0.047, OS: P = 0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Different pretreatment VEGF inhibitors did not affect the efficacy and safety of FTD/TPI plus BEV.</p>","PeriodicalId":13869,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-025-02831-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The effect of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitor pretreatment on clinical outcomes of trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) plus bevacizumab (BEV) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) remains unclear. We aimed to investigate this effect.

Methods: Patients with mCRC treated with FTD/TPI plus BEV were retrospectively enrolled. Disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs) were compared. In total, 73, 50, and 33 patients were treated with fluorouracil+levofolinate calcium+irinotecan (FOLFIRI) plus BEV, ramucirumab, and aflibercept, respectively.

Results: The DCR and median PFS/OS did not significantly differ among the groups (DCR: 54.8% vs. 56.0% vs. 42.4%, P = 0.43; PFS: 3.9 vs. 4.6 vs. 3.7 months, P = 0.45; OS: 12.0 vs. 9.5 vs. 11.9 months, P = 0.28). The most common grade 3-4 AE was neutropenia. The incidence of grade 3-4 AEs did not significantly differ among the groups. The frequency of grade ≥2 proteinuria during FTD/TPI plus BEV treatment was significantly higher in patients with grade ≥2 proteinuria before FOLFIRI plus VEGF inhibitor use than in those without proteinuria. Multivariate analysis revealed poor performance status (ECOG PS) and liver metastasis as independent predictors of short PFS/OS (ECOG PS, PFS: P = 0.021, OS: P < 0.001; liver metastasis, PFS: P = 0.03, OS: P < 0.001) and grade 3-4 neutropenia in a month as a predictor of long PFS/OS (PFS: P = 0.047, OS: P = 0.03).

Conclusion: Different pretreatment VEGF inhibitors did not affect the efficacy and safety of FTD/TPI plus BEV.

血管内皮生长因子抑制剂预处理对转移性结直肠癌患者使用曲氟定/替吡拉西联合贝伐单抗治疗安全性和有效性的影响
背景:血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)抑制剂预处理对转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)患者使用trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI)联合贝伐单抗(BEV)治疗临床结局的影响尚不清楚。我们的目的是调查这种影响。方法:回顾性分析采用FTD/TPI + BEV治疗的mCRC患者。比较疾病控制率(DCR)、无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)和不良事件(ae)。总共有73、50和33名患者分别接受了氟尿嘧啶+左叶酸钙+伊立替康(FOLFIRI) + BEV、ramucirumab和阿非利西普的治疗。结果:各组DCR和中位PFS/OS差异无统计学意义(DCR: 54.8% vs. 56.0% vs. 42.4%, P = 0.43;PFS: 3.9 vs. 4.6 vs. 3.7个月,P = 0.45;OS: 12.0 vs. 9.5 vs. 11.9个月,P = 0.28)。最常见的3-4级AE为中性粒细胞减少症。3-4级ae发生率组间无显著差异。在使用FOLFIRI + VEGF抑制剂前,FTD/TPI + BEV治疗期间,≥2级蛋白尿患者的发生率明显高于无蛋白尿患者。多因素分析显示,不良表现状态(ECOG PS)和肝转移是短PFS/OS (ECOG PS, PFS: P = 0.021, OS: P)的独立预测因素。结论:不同预处理VEGF抑制剂对FTD/TPI联合BEV的疗效和安全性无影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
3.00%
发文量
175
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Clinical Oncology (IJCO) welcomes original research papers on all aspects of clinical oncology that report the results of novel and timely investigations. Reports on clinical trials are encouraged. Experimental studies will also be accepted if they have obvious relevance to clinical oncology. Membership in the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology is not a prerequisite for submission to the journal. Papers are received on the understanding that: their contents have not been published in whole or in part elsewhere; that they are subject to peer review by at least two referees and the Editors, and to editorial revision of the language and contents; and that the Editors are responsible for their acceptance, rejection, and order of publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信