The Effects of Gum Chewing in the Postoperative-Period: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Calandra Li, Akhil Nair, Xi Ming Zhu, Mikaela Leung, Gabrielle Leung, Joseph Catapano, Mark McRae
{"title":"The Effects of Gum Chewing in the Postoperative-Period: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Calandra Li, Akhil Nair, Xi Ming Zhu, Mikaela Leung, Gabrielle Leung, Joseph Catapano, Mark McRae","doi":"10.1111/ans.70238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Postoperative ileus (POI) is a transient impairment of gastrointestinal motility occurring after surgery. Patients with POI can suffer from complications such as increased risk of nosocomial infections, overall mortality risk, and higher overall healthcare costs. This study aims to (a) evaluate the effectiveness of gum chewing on relieving POI symptoms (b) conduct meta-analysis on POI outcome variables to estimate overall effect size.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched MEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Scopus for English language randomized controlled trials (RCTs), evaluating the postoperative effects of gum chewing in adult surgical patients. Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts, and full texts, resolving conflicts by discussion. Study quality was assessed using the GRADE system. Meta-analysis was conducted within two surgical specialty subgroups separately.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 1925 citations, 714 duplicates were removed. After title/abstract screening, 128 proceeded to full text review, out of which 43 studies met the inclusion criteria. Among RCTs, 69.8% noted statistically significant improvement in at least one of the POI outcomes in the intervention cohort. Meta-analysis showed significant reductions in time to first flatus (-7.4 h; p = 0.0003) and defecation (-18.64 h; p < 0.0001) in general and colorectal surgery. Similar reductions were also observed in the OBGYN and gynecology cohort: flatus (-6.52 h; p < 0.0001) and defecation (-9.71 h; p = 0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Chewing gum is a safe low-cost intervention that has the potential to significantly reduce POI symptoms and hospitalization times. Meta-analysis validated the clinical relevance of the intervention. Standardized protocols are still required to delineate true effect sizes and reduce heterogeneity.</p>","PeriodicalId":8158,"journal":{"name":"ANZ Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ANZ Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.70238","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Postoperative ileus (POI) is a transient impairment of gastrointestinal motility occurring after surgery. Patients with POI can suffer from complications such as increased risk of nosocomial infections, overall mortality risk, and higher overall healthcare costs. This study aims to (a) evaluate the effectiveness of gum chewing on relieving POI symptoms (b) conduct meta-analysis on POI outcome variables to estimate overall effect size.

Methods: We searched MEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Scopus for English language randomized controlled trials (RCTs), evaluating the postoperative effects of gum chewing in adult surgical patients. Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts, and full texts, resolving conflicts by discussion. Study quality was assessed using the GRADE system. Meta-analysis was conducted within two surgical specialty subgroups separately.

Results: From 1925 citations, 714 duplicates were removed. After title/abstract screening, 128 proceeded to full text review, out of which 43 studies met the inclusion criteria. Among RCTs, 69.8% noted statistically significant improvement in at least one of the POI outcomes in the intervention cohort. Meta-analysis showed significant reductions in time to first flatus (-7.4 h; p = 0.0003) and defecation (-18.64 h; p < 0.0001) in general and colorectal surgery. Similar reductions were also observed in the OBGYN and gynecology cohort: flatus (-6.52 h; p < 0.0001) and defecation (-9.71 h; p = 0.003).

Conclusion: Chewing gum is a safe low-cost intervention that has the potential to significantly reduce POI symptoms and hospitalization times. Meta-analysis validated the clinical relevance of the intervention. Standardized protocols are still required to delineate true effect sizes and reduce heterogeneity.

术后嚼口香糖的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:术后肠梗阻(POI)是术后发生的一过性胃肠运动障碍。POI患者可能会出现并发症,如医院感染风险增加、总体死亡风险增加和总体医疗保健成本增加。本研究旨在(a)评估嚼口香糖对缓解POI症状的有效性(b)对POI结局变量进行meta分析,以估计总体效应大小。方法:检索MEDLINE (Ovid)、EMBASE、CINAHL、Web of Science、Scopus等英文随机对照试验(rct),评价成人手术患者咀嚼口香糖的术后效果。两位审稿人独立筛选标题、摘要和全文,通过讨论解决冲突。使用GRADE系统评估研究质量。meta分析分别在两个外科专科亚组中进行。结果:1925篇文献共剔除714篇重复。标题/摘要筛选后,128篇进行全文审查,其中43篇研究符合纳入标准。在随机对照试验中,69.8%的患者在干预队列中至少有一项POI结果有统计学上的显著改善。荟萃分析显示首次放屁时间显著缩短(-7.4小时;P = 0.0003)和排便(-18.64 h;结论:嚼口香糖是一种安全、低成本的干预措施,有可能显著减少POI症状和住院时间。荟萃分析证实了干预的临床相关性。标准化的方案仍然需要描述真实的效应大小和减少异质性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ANZ Journal of Surgery
ANZ Journal of Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
720
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: ANZ Journal of Surgery is published by Wiley on behalf of the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons to provide a medium for the publication of peer-reviewed original contributions related to clinical practice and/or research in all fields of surgery and related disciplines. It also provides a programme of continuing education for surgeons. All articles are peer-reviewed by at least two researchers expert in the field of the submitted paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信