Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Off-Label Dosing of Rivaroxaban in Chinese Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Zhe Jiang, Wenmin Dong, Xiaoxiao Lu, Xiaolin Liu, Jingru Gong
{"title":"Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Off-Label Dosing of Rivaroxaban in Chinese Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients","authors":"Zhe Jiang,&nbsp;Wenmin Dong,&nbsp;Xiaoxiao Lu,&nbsp;Xiaolin Liu,&nbsp;Jingru Gong","doi":"10.1155/jcpt/5598614","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><b>Objective:</b> This prospective cohort study aimed to systematically evaluate the clinical outcomes associated with off-label rivaroxaban regimens (10 mg vs. 15 mg daily) in elderly Chinese patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF).</p>\n <p><b>Methods:</b> A hospital-based observational cohort was established at Pudong Hospital, Shanghai, in 2021, enrolling 247 consecutive NVAF patients receiving rivaroxaban therapy after obtaining institutional ethics approval and informed consent. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of clinical outcomes.</p>\n <p><b>Results:</b> The cohort comprised 155 patients in 10 mg daily group and 92 patients in 15 mg daily group, with a mean age of 79 years. During 12-month follow-up, the 15 mg daily group demonstrated superior antithrombotic efficacy with significantly lower incidence of thrombotic events (15 mg: 1.50% vs. 10 mg: 5.90%, <i>p</i> = 0.017). Both regimens showed comparable safety profiles regarding bleeding events (15 mg: 10.90% vs. 10 mg: 13.90%, <i>p</i> = 0.302). Multivariate analysis identified CHA2DS2-VASc score as the primary predictor of thrombosis, while lower BMI, elevated HAS-BLED score, and diabetes mellitus emerged as independent bleeding predictors (all <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05).</p>\n <p><b>Conclusion:</b> Rivaroxaban 15 mg daily showed better thromboembolic protection than 10 mg without increasing bleeding risk, supporting its use in selected high-risk elderly NVAF patients.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15381,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/jcpt/5598614","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/jcpt/5598614","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This prospective cohort study aimed to systematically evaluate the clinical outcomes associated with off-label rivaroxaban regimens (10 mg vs. 15 mg daily) in elderly Chinese patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF).

Methods: A hospital-based observational cohort was established at Pudong Hospital, Shanghai, in 2021, enrolling 247 consecutive NVAF patients receiving rivaroxaban therapy after obtaining institutional ethics approval and informed consent. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of clinical outcomes.

Results: The cohort comprised 155 patients in 10 mg daily group and 92 patients in 15 mg daily group, with a mean age of 79 years. During 12-month follow-up, the 15 mg daily group demonstrated superior antithrombotic efficacy with significantly lower incidence of thrombotic events (15 mg: 1.50% vs. 10 mg: 5.90%, p = 0.017). Both regimens showed comparable safety profiles regarding bleeding events (15 mg: 10.90% vs. 10 mg: 13.90%, p = 0.302). Multivariate analysis identified CHA2DS2-VASc score as the primary predictor of thrombosis, while lower BMI, elevated HAS-BLED score, and diabetes mellitus emerged as independent bleeding predictors (all p < 0.05).

Conclusion: Rivaroxaban 15 mg daily showed better thromboembolic protection than 10 mg without increasing bleeding risk, supporting its use in selected high-risk elderly NVAF patients.

Abstract Image

非瓣膜性心房颤动患者超说明书剂量利伐沙班的疗效和安全性研究
目的:本前瞻性队列研究旨在系统评估中国老年非瓣膜性房颤(NVAF)患者使用说明书外利伐沙班方案(每日10mg vs.每日15mg)的临床结果。方法:于2021年在上海浦东医院建立以医院为基础的观察队列,纳入247例连续接受利伐沙班治疗的非瓣房性房事后获得机构伦理批准和知情同意。进行多变量logistic回归分析以确定临床结果的独立预测因子。结果:该队列包括每日10mg组155例患者和每日15mg组92例患者,平均年龄79岁。在12个月的随访中,每天服用15mg的组表现出更好的抗血栓疗效,血栓事件发生率显著降低(15mg: 1.50% vs. 10mg: 5.90%, p = 0.017)。两种方案在出血事件方面显示出相当的安全性(15 mg: 10.90% vs. 10 mg: 13.90%, p = 0.302)。多因素分析发现CHA2DS2-VASc评分是血栓形成的主要预测因素,而较低的BMI、较高的HAS-BLED评分和糖尿病是独立的出血预测因素(p <;0.05)。结论:每日15mg利伐沙班比每日10mg利伐沙班具有更好的血栓栓塞保护作用,且不增加出血风险,支持在部分老年高危非瓣膜性房颤患者中使用利伐沙班。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics provides a forum for clinicians, pharmacists and pharmacologists to explore and report on issues of common interest. Reports and commentaries on current issues in medical and pharmaceutical practice are encouraged. Papers on evidence-based clinical practice and multidisciplinary collaborative work are particularly welcome. Regular sections in the journal include: editorials, commentaries, reviews (including systematic overviews and meta-analyses), original research and reports, and book reviews. Its scope embraces all aspects of clinical drug development and therapeutics, including: Rational therapeutics Evidence-based practice Safety, cost-effectiveness and clinical efficacy of drugs Drug interactions Clinical impact of drug formulations Pharmacogenetics Personalised, stratified and translational medicine Clinical pharmacokinetics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信