Performance Analysis of Hybrid Scheme of Slotted ALOHA and PD-NOMA for Massive Machine-Type Communications

IF 1.4 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
IET Networks Pub Date : 2025-07-21 DOI:10.1049/ntw2.70009
Chen Guanzhou, Kouki Takahashi, Mai Mikogami, Yuki Ichimura, Takeshi Hirai, Taewoon Kim, Shigeo Shioda
{"title":"Performance Analysis of Hybrid Scheme of Slotted ALOHA and PD-NOMA for Massive Machine-Type Communications","authors":"Chen Guanzhou,&nbsp;Kouki Takahashi,&nbsp;Mai Mikogami,&nbsp;Yuki Ichimura,&nbsp;Takeshi Hirai,&nbsp;Taewoon Kim,&nbsp;Shigeo Shioda","doi":"10.1049/ntw2.70009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper investigates the characteristics of slotted ALOHA and power-domain nonorthogonal multiple access (PD-NOMA) hybrid schemes, focusing on two key performance metrics, namely device transmission success probability and base station throughput, while also considering distance-based unfairness among devices. We analyse three distinct hybrid schemes: a scheme where all devices transmit signals with equal power without utilising received signal strength (RSS) targets (Scheme 1), a scheme where devices randomly select one of multiple RSS targets at the nearest base station (Scheme 2), and a scheme where devices select one of multiple RSS targets based on their proximity to the nearest base station (Scheme 3). Our findings reveal that while Scheme 1 has the highest performance, it also has the most pronounced distance-based unfairness. Conversely, Scheme 2 has the lowest performance but effectively mitigates distance-based unfairness. The performance of Scheme 3 improves as the number of RSS targets increases; however, this coincides with an increase in distance-based unfairness. These results suggest that achieving a balance between fairness and performance improvement may be inherently challenging in grant-free access schemes.</p>","PeriodicalId":46240,"journal":{"name":"IET Networks","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1049/ntw2.70009","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IET Networks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ietresearch.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1049/ntw2.70009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper investigates the characteristics of slotted ALOHA and power-domain nonorthogonal multiple access (PD-NOMA) hybrid schemes, focusing on two key performance metrics, namely device transmission success probability and base station throughput, while also considering distance-based unfairness among devices. We analyse three distinct hybrid schemes: a scheme where all devices transmit signals with equal power without utilising received signal strength (RSS) targets (Scheme 1), a scheme where devices randomly select one of multiple RSS targets at the nearest base station (Scheme 2), and a scheme where devices select one of multiple RSS targets based on their proximity to the nearest base station (Scheme 3). Our findings reveal that while Scheme 1 has the highest performance, it also has the most pronounced distance-based unfairness. Conversely, Scheme 2 has the lowest performance but effectively mitigates distance-based unfairness. The performance of Scheme 3 improves as the number of RSS targets increases; however, this coincides with an increase in distance-based unfairness. These results suggest that achieving a balance between fairness and performance improvement may be inherently challenging in grant-free access schemes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

大规模机型通信中开槽ALOHA和PD-NOMA混合方案的性能分析
本文研究了开槽ALOHA和功率域非正交多址(PD-NOMA)混合方案的特性,重点研究了两个关键性能指标,即设备传输成功率和基站吞吐量,同时考虑了设备之间基于距离的不公平性。我们分析了三种不同的混合方案:一种方案是所有设备在不利用接收信号强度(RSS)目标的情况下以相同的功率发射信号(方案1),一种方案是设备在最近的基站随机选择多个RSS目标之一(方案2),一种方案是设备根据与最近的基站的接近程度从多个RSS目标中选择一个(方案3)。我们的研究结果表明,虽然方案1具有最高的性能,但它也具有最明显的基于距离的不公平。相反,方案2的性能最低,但有效地减轻了基于距离的不公平。方案三的效能随RSS目标数目的增加而改善;然而,与此同时,基于距离的不公平现象也在增加。这些结果表明,在免费访问方案中实现公平和性能改进之间的平衡可能具有固有的挑战性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IET Networks
IET Networks COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
33 weeks
期刊介绍: IET Networks covers the fundamental developments and advancing methodologies to achieve higher performance, optimized and dependable future networks. IET Networks is particularly interested in new ideas and superior solutions to the known and arising technological development bottlenecks at all levels of networking such as topologies, protocols, routing, relaying and resource-allocation for more efficient and more reliable provision of network services. Topics include, but are not limited to: Network Architecture, Design and Planning, Network Protocol, Software, Analysis, Simulation and Experiment, Network Technologies, Applications and Services, Network Security, Operation and Management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信