20. Single-stage debridement and reconstruction with trabecular metal cage for active infectious spondylodiscitis: a retrospective cohort study

IF 2.5 Q3 Medicine
Mingchi Kuo MD , Fon-Yih Tsuang MD, PhD
{"title":"20. Single-stage debridement and reconstruction with trabecular metal cage for active infectious spondylodiscitis: a retrospective cohort study","authors":"Mingchi Kuo MD ,&nbsp;Fon-Yih Tsuang MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.xnsj.2025.100714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>BACKGROUND CONTEXT</h3><div>Early debridement and stabilization for pyogenic spondylodiscitis allow early mobilization of the patient and prevent subsequent spinal deformity. Tantalum (Ta) trabecular metal (TM) components have several potential advantages over conventional implant materials, such as its uniformity and structural continuity, strength, low stiffness, high porosity, and high coefficient of friction. Tantalum trabecular metal also enhances the host defense mechanism by increasing leukocyte chemotaxis, phagocytosis, and the bacterial killing rate. A single-stage surgery with a tantalum trabecular metal cage combining two different approaches is sufficient to maintain vertebral stability.</div></div><div><h3>PURPOSE</h3><div>To evaluate the efficacy and benefits of tantalum metal cages for patients with spondylodiscitis, it is advisable to perform single-stage debridement and reconstruction with a trabecular metal cage, which allows abscess drainage and rapid mobilization, prevents deformity.</div></div><div><h3>STUDY DESIGN/SETTING</h3><div>A single-stage surgery with a tantalum trabecular metal cage combining two different approaches is sufficient to maintain vertebral stability. This retrospective cohort study included 57 patients. Of these, 31 (54%) patients were treated with single-stage debridement and reconstruction with trabecular metal cages, and 26 (45.6%) patients received spine surgery without trabecular metal cages received surgery between January 2018 and March 2021 at our tertiary academic teaching hospital.</div></div><div><h3>PATIENT SAMPLE</h3><div>This was a retrospective study of spondylodiscitis patients who underwent surgery between January 2018 and March 2021 in our tertiary academic teaching hospital. We examined clinical records, radiological images, and surgical notes acquired for all patients who underwent surgical procedures for spondylodiscitis with vertebral body lysis and a propensity for deformity in our institution. Fifty-seven patients met the inclusion criteria (35 male, 22 female). The mean age at the time of treatment was 67 ± 14.08 years (range, 25–92 years). Thirty-one patients underwent reconstructive surgery with a tantalum trabecular metal cage [ZimmerR]. For comparison, we also included 26 patients who underwent surgery without tantalum trabecular metal cages in the same period.</div></div><div><h3>OUTCOME MEASURES</h3><div>We examined patient demographic data, including age and sex, as well as symptoms, laboratory results, neurological examination, radiographic images, operative reports, postoperative complications, and data from clinical and radiological follow-up. We evaluated the CRP data during therapy.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>In all patients, blood tests for CRP levels were obtained 3 days before surgery as baseline data. Further blood chemistry controls in all patients were performed after surgery. As blood tests were not performed on the same day for all patients, we assessed values on Days 0-3, 4-7, 8-14, 15-21, and 22-28 to obtain comparable results. Regarding CRP data, the spread of metric variables among independent groups was described using the Shapiro-Wilk test, evaluating whether the random sample survey exhibited a normal distribution. If the assumption of normal distribution was not rejected (p value = 0.1), a t-test was employed for comparisons. In cases where the assumption of normal distribution was rejected, the Mann-Whitney U test was utilized. Fisher’s exact test was applied to examine the relationship between two categorical variables. Given the exploratory nature of this study, all p values are reported descriptively.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><div>Out of 57 patients, 31 (54%) patients were treated with single-stage debridement and reconstruction with trabecular metal cages, and 26 (45.6%) patients received spine surgery without trabecular metal cages. In the TM cage group, the mean age was 68 years (range, 25–92 years), and there were 18 male and 13 female patients. In the non-TM cage group, the mean age was 65 years (range, 41-85 years). The mean age and age range of the TM group were older and wider than those of the non-TM cage group. The percentage of the spine location was similar between the two groups. The level of CRP data was lower in the TM cage group at three different times (before surgery, postoperation Days 0-3, postoperation Days 22-28). The periods of inpatient stay after the operation were shorter in the Non-TM cage group (TM cage group vs Non-Tm cage group: 47 vs 41 days). A second intervention for debridement, interbody fusion, vertebral body replacement, cage or screw removal was performed in 11 (19.3%) cases within one month after the first intervention. A second intervention was performed significantly more frequently in the non-TM cage group (34.6% vs 6.5%; P= 0.0155) 3 months after the first surgery. The kyphotic angle correction was similar between the two groups, and the correction angle of the TM cage group was slightly smaller than that of the non-TM cage group (-6.27° vs -6.35°; P=0.7595; in our study definition, kyphosis was positive). There was no obvious statistical significance between the two groups. There was no revision surgery for implant failure in either group.</div></div><div><h3>CONCLUSIONS</h3><div>Early debridement and stabilization allow early mobilization of the patient and prevent subsequent spinal deformity. A single-stage surgical procedure that integrates two distinct approaches is capable of preserving vertebral stability. In cases of spondylodiscitis characterized by osteolysis and instability, it is recommended to opt for a single-stage approach involving debridement and reconstruction using a trabecular metal cage. This approach facilitates abscess drainage, enables swift mobilization, mitigates the risk of deformity, and minimally interferes with the effectiveness of antibiotic treatment.</div></div><div><h3>FDA Device/Drug Status</h3><div>“Zimmer TMT” TM Ardis Interbody System Solid (Approved for this indication).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34622,"journal":{"name":"North American Spine Society Journal","volume":"22 ","pages":"Article 100714"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"North American Spine Society Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666548425001349","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Early debridement and stabilization for pyogenic spondylodiscitis allow early mobilization of the patient and prevent subsequent spinal deformity. Tantalum (Ta) trabecular metal (TM) components have several potential advantages over conventional implant materials, such as its uniformity and structural continuity, strength, low stiffness, high porosity, and high coefficient of friction. Tantalum trabecular metal also enhances the host defense mechanism by increasing leukocyte chemotaxis, phagocytosis, and the bacterial killing rate. A single-stage surgery with a tantalum trabecular metal cage combining two different approaches is sufficient to maintain vertebral stability.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and benefits of tantalum metal cages for patients with spondylodiscitis, it is advisable to perform single-stage debridement and reconstruction with a trabecular metal cage, which allows abscess drainage and rapid mobilization, prevents deformity.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

A single-stage surgery with a tantalum trabecular metal cage combining two different approaches is sufficient to maintain vertebral stability. This retrospective cohort study included 57 patients. Of these, 31 (54%) patients were treated with single-stage debridement and reconstruction with trabecular metal cages, and 26 (45.6%) patients received spine surgery without trabecular metal cages received surgery between January 2018 and March 2021 at our tertiary academic teaching hospital.

PATIENT SAMPLE

This was a retrospective study of spondylodiscitis patients who underwent surgery between January 2018 and March 2021 in our tertiary academic teaching hospital. We examined clinical records, radiological images, and surgical notes acquired for all patients who underwent surgical procedures for spondylodiscitis with vertebral body lysis and a propensity for deformity in our institution. Fifty-seven patients met the inclusion criteria (35 male, 22 female). The mean age at the time of treatment was 67 ± 14.08 years (range, 25–92 years). Thirty-one patients underwent reconstructive surgery with a tantalum trabecular metal cage [ZimmerR]. For comparison, we also included 26 patients who underwent surgery without tantalum trabecular metal cages in the same period.

OUTCOME MEASURES

We examined patient demographic data, including age and sex, as well as symptoms, laboratory results, neurological examination, radiographic images, operative reports, postoperative complications, and data from clinical and radiological follow-up. We evaluated the CRP data during therapy.

METHODS

In all patients, blood tests for CRP levels were obtained 3 days before surgery as baseline data. Further blood chemistry controls in all patients were performed after surgery. As blood tests were not performed on the same day for all patients, we assessed values on Days 0-3, 4-7, 8-14, 15-21, and 22-28 to obtain comparable results. Regarding CRP data, the spread of metric variables among independent groups was described using the Shapiro-Wilk test, evaluating whether the random sample survey exhibited a normal distribution. If the assumption of normal distribution was not rejected (p value = 0.1), a t-test was employed for comparisons. In cases where the assumption of normal distribution was rejected, the Mann-Whitney U test was utilized. Fisher’s exact test was applied to examine the relationship between two categorical variables. Given the exploratory nature of this study, all p values are reported descriptively.

RESULTS

Out of 57 patients, 31 (54%) patients were treated with single-stage debridement and reconstruction with trabecular metal cages, and 26 (45.6%) patients received spine surgery without trabecular metal cages. In the TM cage group, the mean age was 68 years (range, 25–92 years), and there were 18 male and 13 female patients. In the non-TM cage group, the mean age was 65 years (range, 41-85 years). The mean age and age range of the TM group were older and wider than those of the non-TM cage group. The percentage of the spine location was similar between the two groups. The level of CRP data was lower in the TM cage group at three different times (before surgery, postoperation Days 0-3, postoperation Days 22-28). The periods of inpatient stay after the operation were shorter in the Non-TM cage group (TM cage group vs Non-Tm cage group: 47 vs 41 days). A second intervention for debridement, interbody fusion, vertebral body replacement, cage or screw removal was performed in 11 (19.3%) cases within one month after the first intervention. A second intervention was performed significantly more frequently in the non-TM cage group (34.6% vs 6.5%; P= 0.0155) 3 months after the first surgery. The kyphotic angle correction was similar between the two groups, and the correction angle of the TM cage group was slightly smaller than that of the non-TM cage group (-6.27° vs -6.35°; P=0.7595; in our study definition, kyphosis was positive). There was no obvious statistical significance between the two groups. There was no revision surgery for implant failure in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

Early debridement and stabilization allow early mobilization of the patient and prevent subsequent spinal deformity. A single-stage surgical procedure that integrates two distinct approaches is capable of preserving vertebral stability. In cases of spondylodiscitis characterized by osteolysis and instability, it is recommended to opt for a single-stage approach involving debridement and reconstruction using a trabecular metal cage. This approach facilitates abscess drainage, enables swift mobilization, mitigates the risk of deformity, and minimally interferes with the effectiveness of antibiotic treatment.

FDA Device/Drug Status

“Zimmer TMT” TM Ardis Interbody System Solid (Approved for this indication).
20.。小梁金属笼单期清创重建治疗活动性感染性脊柱炎:回顾性队列研究
背景:化脓性脊柱炎的早期清创和稳定可以使患者早期活动,防止随后的脊柱畸形。与传统植入材料相比,钽(Ta)金属小梁(TM)组件具有几个潜在的优势,例如其均匀性和结构连续性、强度、低刚度、高孔隙率和高摩擦系数。钽小梁金属还通过增加白细胞趋化、吞噬和细菌杀灭率来增强宿主防御机制。单阶段手术结合两种不同入路的钽小梁金属笼足以维持椎体稳定。目的评价钽金属笼对颈椎炎患者的疗效和益处,建议采用小梁金属笼进行一期清创重建,使脓肿引流和快速活动,防止畸形。研究设计/背景单期手术结合两种不同入路的钽小梁金属笼足以维持椎体稳定。这项回顾性队列研究包括57例患者。其中,2018年1月至2021年3月,31例(54%)患者在我院三级学术教学医院接受了一期骨小梁金属笼清创重建,26例(45.6%)患者接受了无骨小梁金属笼脊柱手术。患者样本:本研究是对2018年1月至2021年3月在我院三级学术教学医院接受手术的脊柱椎间盘炎患者的回顾性研究。我们检查了我院所有因椎体松解和畸形倾向而接受手术治疗的脊柱椎间盘炎患者的临床记录、放射影像和手术记录。57例患者符合纳入标准(男35例,女22例)。治疗时平均年龄为67±14.08岁(范围25 ~ 92岁)。31例患者行钽小梁金属笼重建手术[ZimmerR]。为了比较,我们还纳入了同期未使用钽小梁金属笼手术的26例患者。我们检查了患者的人口统计学数据,包括年龄和性别,以及症状、实验室结果、神经学检查、放射学图像、手术报告、术后并发症以及临床和放射学随访数据。我们在治疗期间评估CRP数据。方法所有患者术前3 d血CRP水平检测作为基线数据。术后对所有患者进行进一步的血液化学控制。由于并非所有患者在同一天进行血液检查,我们在0-3天、4-7天、8-14天、15-21天和22-28天评估数值,以获得可比结果。对于CRP数据,使用Shapiro-Wilk检验描述独立组间度量变量的分布,评估随机抽样调查是否呈现正态分布。如果不拒绝正态分布假设(p值 = 0.1),则采用t检验进行比较。在拒绝正态分布假设的情况下,使用Mann-Whitney U检验。费雪精确检验用于检验两个分类变量之间的关系。考虑到本研究的探索性,所有的p值都是描述性的。结果57例患者中,31例(54%)行一期骨小梁金属笼清创重建,26例(45.6%)行未行骨小梁金属笼脊柱手术。TM笼组平均年龄68岁(25 ~ 92岁),男18例,女13例。非tm笼组平均年龄65岁(范围41-85岁)。TM组的平均年龄和年龄范围比非TM笼组大、宽。两组间脊柱定位的百分率相似。TM笼组在术前、术后0 ~ 3天、术后22 ~ 28天三个不同时间CRP水平均较低。非TM笼组术后住院时间较短(TM笼组vs非TM笼组:47 d vs 41 d)。11例(19.3%)患者在第一次干预后一个月内进行了第二次干预,包括清创、椎体间融合术、椎体置换术、椎笼或螺钉取出。非tm笼组进行第二次干预的频率明显更高(34.6% vs 6.5%;P= 0.0155)。两组后凸角矫正效果相似,TM笼组矫正角度略小于非TM笼组(-6.27°vs -6.35°;P = 0.7595;在我们的研究定义中,后凸是阳性的)。 两组间差异无明显统计学意义。两组均未因种植体失败进行翻修手术。结论:早期清创和稳定可以使患者早期活动,防止随后的脊柱畸形。结合两种不同入路的单阶段外科手术能够保持椎体的稳定性。在以骨溶解和不稳定为特征的脊柱炎病例中,建议选择单阶段入路,包括清创和使用小梁金属笼重建。这种方法有助于脓肿引流,能够快速活动,减轻畸形的风险,并且最小程度地干扰抗生素治疗的有效性。FDA设备/药物状态“Zimmer TMT”TM Ardis体间系统固体(批准用于此适应症)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
48 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信