Moran process stochastic evolutionary game model for cooperative innovation strategies in green technology

IF 12.5 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL ISSUES
Xiaoxiao Zhou , Mengyu Jia , Andrea Gatto , Xin Zhao
{"title":"Moran process stochastic evolutionary game model for cooperative innovation strategies in green technology","authors":"Xiaoxiao Zhou ,&nbsp;Mengyu Jia ,&nbsp;Andrea Gatto ,&nbsp;Xin Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The innovation paradigm of enterprises in the digital economy era has shifted from closed to cooperative innovation between enterprises and external subjects. Cooperative innovation has increasingly become a crucial strategy for enterprises to improve their technology. This study examines enterprise green technology innovation cooperation through a stochastic evolution game perspective and introduces the digitalization level, green finance, and technological knowledge complementarity. Based on the principle of Moran's process of birth and death, we construct a game model of enterprise green technology cooperative innovation to describe the decision-making interaction mechanism among the main subjects. We calculate fixation and exit times for enterprise green technology innovation cooperation behavior under the weak choice. We discovered that when the synergy benefit is more pronounced than a specific multiplier cost, it helps fix cooperative strategies. As synergy benefit increases, fixation and exit times shorten and prolong, respectively. Compared to low green finance, the probability of the fixation of a separate innovation strategy under high green finance is reduced, fixation time is prolonged continuously, and the exit time of the cooperative strategy is prolonged. Furthermore, through numerical simulation, the digitalization level, green finance, and technological knowledge complementarity synergize the impact of cooperative innovation strategies, strengthening the sustainability stability of green technology cooperative innovation. This conclusion is further corroborated by an empirical test using data from listed companies in 2007–2022. It also provides new ideas for theoretical research on cooperative innovation, offers lessons on how to build innovation consortia, and shapes the implementation of innovation clusters.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":"83 ","pages":"Article 103010"},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology in Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X25002003","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The innovation paradigm of enterprises in the digital economy era has shifted from closed to cooperative innovation between enterprises and external subjects. Cooperative innovation has increasingly become a crucial strategy for enterprises to improve their technology. This study examines enterprise green technology innovation cooperation through a stochastic evolution game perspective and introduces the digitalization level, green finance, and technological knowledge complementarity. Based on the principle of Moran's process of birth and death, we construct a game model of enterprise green technology cooperative innovation to describe the decision-making interaction mechanism among the main subjects. We calculate fixation and exit times for enterprise green technology innovation cooperation behavior under the weak choice. We discovered that when the synergy benefit is more pronounced than a specific multiplier cost, it helps fix cooperative strategies. As synergy benefit increases, fixation and exit times shorten and prolong, respectively. Compared to low green finance, the probability of the fixation of a separate innovation strategy under high green finance is reduced, fixation time is prolonged continuously, and the exit time of the cooperative strategy is prolonged. Furthermore, through numerical simulation, the digitalization level, green finance, and technological knowledge complementarity synergize the impact of cooperative innovation strategies, strengthening the sustainability stability of green technology cooperative innovation. This conclusion is further corroborated by an empirical test using data from listed companies in 2007–2022. It also provides new ideas for theoretical research on cooperative innovation, offers lessons on how to build innovation consortia, and shapes the implementation of innovation clusters.
绿色技术合作创新策略的Moran过程随机进化博弈模型
数字经济时代企业的创新范式已经从封闭创新转向企业与外部主体的合作创新。合作创新日益成为企业提高技术水平的重要战略。本文通过随机演化博弈视角考察企业绿色技术创新合作,引入数字化水平、绿色金融和技术知识互补性。基于莫兰生灭过程原理,构建了企业绿色技术合作创新的博弈模型,描述了主体之间的决策互动机制。本文计算了弱选择下企业绿色技术创新合作行为的固定时间和退出时间。我们发现,当协同效益比特定乘数成本更明显时,它有助于确定合作策略。随着协同效益的增加,固定和退出时间分别缩短和延长。与低绿色金融相比,高绿色金融下单独创新战略固定的概率降低,固定时间持续延长,合作战略退出时间延长。此外,通过数值模拟,数字化水平、绿色金融和技术知识互补性协同了合作创新战略的影响,增强了绿色技术合作创新的可持续性稳定性。利用2007-2022年上市公司数据的实证检验进一步证实了这一结论。为合作创新的理论研究提供了新的思路,为如何构建创新联盟提供了借鉴,并为创新集群的实施提供了借鉴。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.90
自引率
14.10%
发文量
316
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Technology in Society is a global journal dedicated to fostering discourse at the crossroads of technological change and the social, economic, business, and philosophical transformation of our world. The journal aims to provide scholarly contributions that empower decision-makers to thoughtfully and intentionally navigate the decisions shaping this dynamic landscape. A common thread across these fields is the role of technology in society, influencing economic, political, and cultural dynamics. Scholarly work in Technology in Society delves into the social forces shaping technological decisions and the societal choices regarding technology use. This encompasses scholarly and theoretical approaches (history and philosophy of science and technology, technology forecasting, economic growth, and policy, ethics), applied approaches (business innovation, technology management, legal and engineering), and developmental perspectives (technology transfer, technology assessment, and economic development). Detailed information about the journal's aims and scope on specific topics can be found in Technology in Society Briefings, accessible via our Special Issues and Article Collections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信