Assessment of primary macronutrient deficiency of maize (Zea mays L.) through nutrient omission trials in Omo Nadda district, southwestern Ethiopia

IF 1.5 Q3 AGRONOMY
Mustefa Edao, Milkiyas Ahmed, Endale Kibru, Amsalu Nebiyu
{"title":"Assessment of primary macronutrient deficiency of maize (Zea mays L.) through nutrient omission trials in Omo Nadda district, southwestern Ethiopia","authors":"Mustefa Edao,&nbsp;Milkiyas Ahmed,&nbsp;Endale Kibru,&nbsp;Amsalu Nebiyu","doi":"10.1002/agg2.70188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Maize (<i>Zea mays</i> L.) is a crucial staple crop in Ethiopia, widely cultivated and consumed across various regions. Despite the ongoing efforts to increase production, maize yields in some areas remain below their potential due to persistent nutrient deficiencies and improper fertilizer application practices. To address this challenge, a study was conducted in 2023 in the Nitisols of Omo Nada District, Southwestern Ethiopia, to identify the key nutrients limiting maize yields and assess the effect of nutrient omission on maize production. The study employed a randomized complete block design with four farmer groups serving as replicates. Various nutrient omission treatments were applied, including control (no amendment), PK (−N), NK (−P), NP (−K), nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium (NPK), and NPK + lime. Maize growth parameters, yield, yield components, and agronomic efficiencies were carefully monitored and analyzed using SAS 9.3 software. The results showed that the application of 120 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> + 46 kg P ha<sup>−1</sup> and 120-46-50 NPK ha<sup>−1</sup> produced significantly higher grain yields—(9.7 tonne ha<sup>−1</sup>) and total biomass including stover (11.66 tonne ha<sup>−1</sup>). The exclusion of nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) in comparison to NPK resulted in significant yield losses of 5.76 tonne ha-1 (59.38%) and 3.93 tonne ha<sup>−1</sup> (40.52%), respectively. Furthermore, the addition of lime to NPK treatment increased grain yield by 10.93% compared to NPK alone. The grain yield reductions followed the order: control &gt; PK &gt; NK &gt; NP &gt; NPK &gt; NPK + lime. The maximum agronomic efficiencies for nitrogen (68.39), phosphorus (178.42), and potassium (164.15) were achieved with the NPK + lime treatment. In conclusion, nitrogen and phosphorus were the critical nutrients limiting maize yields on Nitisols in southwestern Ethiopia. By adopting a nutrient management strategy that addresses both N and P nutrient deficiencies and soil acidity, farmers can improve maize production and achieve sustainable crop yields in the region.</p>","PeriodicalId":7567,"journal":{"name":"Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment","volume":"8 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agg2.70188","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agg2.70188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Maize (Zea mays L.) is a crucial staple crop in Ethiopia, widely cultivated and consumed across various regions. Despite the ongoing efforts to increase production, maize yields in some areas remain below their potential due to persistent nutrient deficiencies and improper fertilizer application practices. To address this challenge, a study was conducted in 2023 in the Nitisols of Omo Nada District, Southwestern Ethiopia, to identify the key nutrients limiting maize yields and assess the effect of nutrient omission on maize production. The study employed a randomized complete block design with four farmer groups serving as replicates. Various nutrient omission treatments were applied, including control (no amendment), PK (−N), NK (−P), NP (−K), nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium (NPK), and NPK + lime. Maize growth parameters, yield, yield components, and agronomic efficiencies were carefully monitored and analyzed using SAS 9.3 software. The results showed that the application of 120 kg N ha−1 + 46 kg P ha−1 and 120-46-50 NPK ha−1 produced significantly higher grain yields—(9.7 tonne ha−1) and total biomass including stover (11.66 tonne ha−1). The exclusion of nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) in comparison to NPK resulted in significant yield losses of 5.76 tonne ha-1 (59.38%) and 3.93 tonne ha−1 (40.52%), respectively. Furthermore, the addition of lime to NPK treatment increased grain yield by 10.93% compared to NPK alone. The grain yield reductions followed the order: control > PK > NK > NP > NPK > NPK + lime. The maximum agronomic efficiencies for nitrogen (68.39), phosphorus (178.42), and potassium (164.15) were achieved with the NPK + lime treatment. In conclusion, nitrogen and phosphorus were the critical nutrients limiting maize yields on Nitisols in southwestern Ethiopia. By adopting a nutrient management strategy that addresses both N and P nutrient deficiencies and soil acidity, farmers can improve maize production and achieve sustainable crop yields in the region.

Abstract Image

通过营养遗漏试验评估埃塞俄比亚西南部Omo Nadda地区玉米(Zea mays L.)主要常量营养素缺乏症
玉米(Zea mays L.)是埃塞俄比亚重要的主粮作物,在各个地区广泛种植和消费。尽管正在努力提高产量,但由于持续的营养缺乏和不当的施肥做法,一些地区的玉米产量仍低于其潜力。为了应对这一挑战,我们于2023年在埃塞俄比亚西南部Omo Nada地区的Nitisols开展了一项研究,以确定限制玉米产量的关键营养物质,并评估营养遗漏对玉米生产的影响。本研究采用随机完全区组设计,4个农民组作为重复。采用不同的营养遗漏处理,包括对照(无添加)、PK(−N)、NK(−P)、NP(−K)、氮、磷、钾(NPK)和NPK +石灰。利用SAS 9.3软件对玉米生长参数、产量、产量组成和农艺效率进行仔细监测和分析。结果表明,施用120 kg N + 46 kg P和120-46-50 NPK ha - 1可显著提高籽粒产量(9.7吨ha - 1)和总生物量(11.66吨ha - 1)。与NPK相比,不施用氮(N)和磷(P)导致产量损失显著,分别为5.76吨ha-1(59.38%)和3.93吨ha-1(40.52%)。氮磷钾处理中添加石灰比单独施用氮磷钾可增产10.93%。粮食减产顺序为:控制;PK祝辞NK祝辞NP祝辞氮磷钾祝辞氮磷钾+石灰。氮磷钾+石灰处理的氮肥、磷和钾的农艺效率最高,分别为68.39、178.42和164.15。综上所述,氮和磷是埃塞俄比亚西南部Nitisols上限制玉米产量的关键养分。通过采取解决氮磷营养缺乏和土壤酸度问题的养分管理战略,农民可以提高玉米产量,实现该地区的可持续作物产量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment
Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信