P19. Infection following cervical artificial disc replacement

IF 2.5 Q3 Medicine
Adeesya Gausper BA , Justin K. Scheer MD , Suhas K Etigunta BS , Andy M Liu BS , Alexander Tuchman MD
{"title":"P19. Infection following cervical artificial disc replacement","authors":"Adeesya Gausper BA ,&nbsp;Justin K. Scheer MD ,&nbsp;Suhas K Etigunta BS ,&nbsp;Andy M Liu BS ,&nbsp;Alexander Tuchman MD","doi":"10.1016/j.xnsj.2025.100643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>BACKGROUND CONTEXT</h3><div>Cervical artificial disc replacement (ADR) is a procedure performed for patients with cervical disc degeneration or herniation in the setting of radiculopathy or myelopathy, with a primary advantage of motion preservation compared to fusion procedures. Infection following cervical ADR is poorly understood, with no established guidelines for prevention or management.</div></div><div><h3>PURPOSE</h3><div>This case series aims to characterize the clinical presentation, microbiological findings, and outcomes of patients who develop cervical ADR infections.</div></div><div><h3>STUDY DESIGN/SETTING</h3><div>Retrospective case series.</div></div><div><h3>PATIENT SAMPLE</h3><div>N/A</div></div><div><h3>OUTCOME MEASURES</h3><div>N/A</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>We conducted a retrospective review of patients treated at our institution who developed infection following cervical ADR and underwent subsequent revision surgery. Data collected included patient demographics, clinical presentation, infective organism, and type of disc implanted. Infections were identified based on clinical symptoms and radiographical findings and confirmed with microbiological cultures. Infection management, including antibiotic therapy and revision surgery, was recorded.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><div>A total of 23 cases involving 18 patients were included in this study. Five patients (27.8%) required two revision surgeries. Intractable neck pain and cervical radiculopathy were reported in nearly all patients. Upper extremity weakness, muscular spasms, balance issues, and dysphagia were also reported. Head and neck trauma preceded symptom onset in 3 patients. Time from symptom onset to diagnosis ranged from 4 days to 98 weeks (mean 32.7 weeks). Species most commonly isolated from OR cultures were Cutibacterium acnes in 14 cases (60.9%) and Staphylococcus epidermidis in 7 cases (30.4%). Polymicrobial cultures were isolated in 9 cases, and cultures were negative in 3 cases. Intraoperative vancomycin powder was not used in any initial ADR surgery, and vancomycin powder was utilized in 4 revisions. Notably, of the 17 patients who underwent revision of hardware, 100% were eventually converted to fusion.</div></div><div><h3>CONCLUSIONS</h3><div>Infection following cervical ADR is rare but poses significant clinical challenges and most often requires conversion to fusion. Early identification and appropriate management are critical to optimizing patient outcomes. Variability in clinical presentation and time to diagnosis highlights the need to refine perioperative protocols to reduce infection risk and improve success of subsequent procedures. This study reports the largest cohort of patients with infected cervical ADRs to date and provides valuable insights to inform future guidelines for prevention and management.</div></div><div><h3>FDA Device/Drug Status</h3><div>This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34622,"journal":{"name":"North American Spine Society Journal","volume":"22 ","pages":"Article 100643"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"North American Spine Society Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666548425000630","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Cervical artificial disc replacement (ADR) is a procedure performed for patients with cervical disc degeneration or herniation in the setting of radiculopathy or myelopathy, with a primary advantage of motion preservation compared to fusion procedures. Infection following cervical ADR is poorly understood, with no established guidelines for prevention or management.

PURPOSE

This case series aims to characterize the clinical presentation, microbiological findings, and outcomes of patients who develop cervical ADR infections.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Retrospective case series.

PATIENT SAMPLE

N/A

OUTCOME MEASURES

N/A

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of patients treated at our institution who developed infection following cervical ADR and underwent subsequent revision surgery. Data collected included patient demographics, clinical presentation, infective organism, and type of disc implanted. Infections were identified based on clinical symptoms and radiographical findings and confirmed with microbiological cultures. Infection management, including antibiotic therapy and revision surgery, was recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 23 cases involving 18 patients were included in this study. Five patients (27.8%) required two revision surgeries. Intractable neck pain and cervical radiculopathy were reported in nearly all patients. Upper extremity weakness, muscular spasms, balance issues, and dysphagia were also reported. Head and neck trauma preceded symptom onset in 3 patients. Time from symptom onset to diagnosis ranged from 4 days to 98 weeks (mean 32.7 weeks). Species most commonly isolated from OR cultures were Cutibacterium acnes in 14 cases (60.9%) and Staphylococcus epidermidis in 7 cases (30.4%). Polymicrobial cultures were isolated in 9 cases, and cultures were negative in 3 cases. Intraoperative vancomycin powder was not used in any initial ADR surgery, and vancomycin powder was utilized in 4 revisions. Notably, of the 17 patients who underwent revision of hardware, 100% were eventually converted to fusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Infection following cervical ADR is rare but poses significant clinical challenges and most often requires conversion to fusion. Early identification and appropriate management are critical to optimizing patient outcomes. Variability in clinical presentation and time to diagnosis highlights the need to refine perioperative protocols to reduce infection risk and improve success of subsequent procedures. This study reports the largest cohort of patients with infected cervical ADRs to date and provides valuable insights to inform future guidelines for prevention and management.

FDA Device/Drug Status

This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.
P19。颈椎人工椎间盘置换术后感染
背景背景颈椎人工椎间盘置换术(ADR)是一种治疗神经根病或脊髓病的颈椎椎间盘退变或突出患者的手术,与融合手术相比,其主要优点是保持运动。人们对宫颈不良反应引起的感染了解甚少,没有既定的预防或管理指南。目的:本病例系列旨在描述宫颈不良反应感染患者的临床表现、微生物学结果和预后。研究设计/设置回顾性病例系列。患者样本/结果测量/方法我们对在我院治疗的宫颈不良反应后发生感染并随后进行翻修手术的患者进行了回顾性研究。收集的数据包括患者人口统计学、临床表现、感染菌和植入椎间盘的类型。根据临床症状和x线检查结果确定感染,并通过微生物培养确诊。记录感染管理,包括抗生素治疗和翻修手术。结果本研究共纳入23例患者18例。5例(27.8%)患者需要两次翻修手术。几乎所有的患者都报告了顽固性颈部疼痛和颈椎神经根病。上肢无力、肌肉痉挛、平衡问题和吞咽困难也有报道。3例患者出现症状前有头颈部外伤。从症状出现到诊断的时间从4天到98周不等(平均32.7周)。OR培养中最常见的菌种是痤疮角质杆菌14例(60.9%)和表皮葡萄球菌7例(30.4%)。多菌培养9例,培养阴性3例。术中未使用万古霉素粉剂进行首次不良反应手术,4次改版均使用万古霉素粉剂。值得注意的是,在17例接受内固定翻修的患者中,100%最终转化为融合。结论宫颈不良反应引起的感染是罕见的,但对临床有很大的挑战,通常需要转化为融合。早期识别和适当管理对于优化患者预后至关重要。临床表现和诊断时间的差异突出了改进围手术期方案以降低感染风险和提高后续手术成功率的必要性。本研究报告了迄今为止最大的宫颈感染不良反应患者队列,并为未来的预防和管理指南提供了有价值的见解。FDA器械/药物状态本摘要不讨论或包括任何适用的器械或药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
48 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信