Establishing the adequate levothyroxine dose after total thyroidectomy: A systematic review with meta-analysis.

Isabella Chiardi, Laura Croce, Paolo Caccavale, Jacopo Bertini, Francesca Coperchini, Flavia Magri, Carlo Cappelli, Pierpaolo Trimboli, Mario Rotondi
{"title":"Establishing the adequate levothyroxine dose after total thyroidectomy: A systematic review with meta-analysis.","authors":"Isabella Chiardi, Laura Croce, Paolo Caccavale, Jacopo Bertini, Francesca Coperchini, Flavia Magri, Carlo Cappelli, Pierpaolo Trimboli, Mario Rotondi","doi":"10.1210/clinem/dgaf417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Total thyroidectomy requires lifelong levothyroxine (LT4) therapy. Achieving optimal thyroid hormone replacement at the first post-operative follow-up might be harder than it could be expected. Despite various LT4 dose choosing strategies were tested, there is no consensus on the most effective approach to achieve early euthyroidism.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis, including studies published between 2000 and 2024 that reported the proportion of patients achieving euthyroidism at first follow-up after total thyroidectomy. Data from 11 studies comprising 2577 patients were analyzed. LT4 dosing strategies included fixed-dose, weight-based (dose/kg), and individualized algorithm-based methods. Meta-regression and subgroup analyses were used to explore sources of heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The pooled euthyroidism rate at first follow-up was 33.9%, with high heterogeneity across studies (I² = 82.68%). No dosing strategy consistently outperformed others: dose/kg methods achieved 29% euthyroidism, while fixed or algorithm-based approaches achieved 40%, though without statistical significance. Meta-regression analysis did not identify any statistically significant predictor. No significant differences emerged between patients treated for benign or malignant thyroid diseases or between retrospective and prospective study designs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Only about one-third of patients achieve euthyroidism at first follow-up after thyroidectomy, regardless of LT4 dosing strategy. The current guidelines recommendation of applying a pro/kg dose may not be adequate, and even personalized algorithms yield inconsistent results. Future prospective studies are needed to refine individualized dosing protocols and identify additional factors influencing LT4 requirements.</p>","PeriodicalId":520805,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgaf417","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Total thyroidectomy requires lifelong levothyroxine (LT4) therapy. Achieving optimal thyroid hormone replacement at the first post-operative follow-up might be harder than it could be expected. Despite various LT4 dose choosing strategies were tested, there is no consensus on the most effective approach to achieve early euthyroidism.

Materials and methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis, including studies published between 2000 and 2024 that reported the proportion of patients achieving euthyroidism at first follow-up after total thyroidectomy. Data from 11 studies comprising 2577 patients were analyzed. LT4 dosing strategies included fixed-dose, weight-based (dose/kg), and individualized algorithm-based methods. Meta-regression and subgroup analyses were used to explore sources of heterogeneity.

Results: The pooled euthyroidism rate at first follow-up was 33.9%, with high heterogeneity across studies (I² = 82.68%). No dosing strategy consistently outperformed others: dose/kg methods achieved 29% euthyroidism, while fixed or algorithm-based approaches achieved 40%, though without statistical significance. Meta-regression analysis did not identify any statistically significant predictor. No significant differences emerged between patients treated for benign or malignant thyroid diseases or between retrospective and prospective study designs.

Conclusions: Only about one-third of patients achieve euthyroidism at first follow-up after thyroidectomy, regardless of LT4 dosing strategy. The current guidelines recommendation of applying a pro/kg dose may not be adequate, and even personalized algorithms yield inconsistent results. Future prospective studies are needed to refine individualized dosing protocols and identify additional factors influencing LT4 requirements.

建立甲状腺全切除术后适当的左甲状腺素剂量:一项荟萃分析的系统回顾。
背景:全甲状腺切除术需要终身左甲状腺素(LT4)治疗。在术后第一次随访中实现最佳甲状腺激素替代可能比预期的要困难。尽管对各种LT4剂量选择策略进行了测试,但对于实现早期甲状腺功能亢进的最有效方法尚无共识。材料和方法:我们进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,包括2000年至2024年间发表的研究,这些研究报告了甲状腺全切除术后首次随访时实现甲状腺功能正常的患者比例。分析了11项研究的数据,包括2577名患者。LT4给药策略包括固定剂量、基于体重(剂量/kg)和基于个性化算法的方法。采用元回归和亚组分析探讨异质性的来源。结果:首次随访时甲状腺功能亢进总发生率为33.9%,各研究间异质性较高(I²= 82.68%)。没有一种给药策略一贯优于其他给药策略:剂量/kg方法实现了29%的甲状腺功能亢进,而固定或基于算法的方法实现了40%,但没有统计学意义。meta回归分析未发现任何具有统计学意义的预测因子。在接受良性或恶性甲状腺疾病治疗的患者之间,以及回顾性和前瞻性研究设计之间,没有出现显著差异。结论:无论LT4的给药策略如何,只有约三分之一的患者在甲状腺切除术后的第一次随访中达到甲状腺功能正常。目前的指南建议应用pro/kg剂量可能不够,甚至个性化算法也会产生不一致的结果。未来的前瞻性研究需要完善个体化给药方案,并确定影响LT4需求的其他因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信