Exploring the Obesity Paradox: A Multisystem Review.

IF 1.8
Kanishk Aggrawal, Vasu Gupta, Baltej Singh, Raunak Medatwal, Shivank Singh, Pranjal Jain, Rohit Jain
{"title":"Exploring the Obesity Paradox: A Multisystem Review.","authors":"Kanishk Aggrawal, Vasu Gupta, Baltej Singh, Raunak Medatwal, Shivank Singh, Pranjal Jain, Rohit Jain","doi":"10.1016/j.amjms.2025.07.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Obesity has plagued the entire world and is a known risk factor across the spectrum of diseases involving neurological, cardiovascular, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, and hematological and is commonly associated with poor clinical outcomes. Obesity paradox is a concept that contradicts the prevailing medical knowledge by proposing the notion that obese patients have better mortality, morbidity, and survival rates when compared to the non-obese patient population suffering with the similar medical conditions. Although observed more commonly in patients with cardiovascular diseases, more research is coming forward citing the similar effects in critically ill patients, those with chronic kidney disease, end stage renal disease, and cancer patients. Despite extensive research, the underlying mechanisms of the Obesity Paradox remain unclear, complicated by the reliance on BMI and the neglect of confounding factors like age, comorbidities, socioeconomic status, and one of the commonly proposed solutions is to make use of other anthropological indices of obesity. This calls for a more in-depth dive into this issue to find an explanation behind this paradox or even more to confirm if it actually exists.</p>","PeriodicalId":94223,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of the medical sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of the medical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjms.2025.07.010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Obesity has plagued the entire world and is a known risk factor across the spectrum of diseases involving neurological, cardiovascular, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, and hematological and is commonly associated with poor clinical outcomes. Obesity paradox is a concept that contradicts the prevailing medical knowledge by proposing the notion that obese patients have better mortality, morbidity, and survival rates when compared to the non-obese patient population suffering with the similar medical conditions. Although observed more commonly in patients with cardiovascular diseases, more research is coming forward citing the similar effects in critically ill patients, those with chronic kidney disease, end stage renal disease, and cancer patients. Despite extensive research, the underlying mechanisms of the Obesity Paradox remain unclear, complicated by the reliance on BMI and the neglect of confounding factors like age, comorbidities, socioeconomic status, and one of the commonly proposed solutions is to make use of other anthropological indices of obesity. This calls for a more in-depth dive into this issue to find an explanation behind this paradox or even more to confirm if it actually exists.

探索肥胖悖论:多系统回顾。
肥胖一直困扰着整个世界,是一个已知的危险因素,涉及神经、心血管、肺部、胃肠道和血液系统疾病,通常与不良的临床结果有关。肥胖悖论(Obesity paradox)是一个与主流医学知识相矛盾的概念,它提出了肥胖患者在相同医疗条件下比非肥胖患者具有更高的死亡率、发病率和存活率的概念。虽然在心血管疾病患者中更常见,但越来越多的研究表明,在危重患者、慢性肾病患者、终末期肾病患者和癌症患者中也有类似的效果。尽管进行了广泛的研究,但肥胖悖论的潜在机制仍不清楚,对BMI的依赖和对年龄、合并症、社会经济地位等混杂因素的忽视使其复杂化,而通常提出的解决方案之一是利用其他人类学的肥胖指标。这就要求我们对这个问题进行更深入的研究,以找到这个悖论背后的解释,甚至确认它是否真的存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信