What determines people's willingness to donate a kidney as part of an organ exchange programme?

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Psychology Health & Medicine Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-20 DOI:10.1080/13548506.2025.2528116
Taylor Nealon, Katherine M White
{"title":"What determines people's willingness to donate a kidney as part of an organ exchange programme?","authors":"Taylor Nealon, Katherine M White","doi":"10.1080/13548506.2025.2528116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Living organ donation through exchange programmes, where donors are anonymously matched with recipients, is a growing practice that addresses compatibility barriers in transplantation. However, limited research explores predictors influencing individuals' willingness to engage in such programmes. This study used the prototype willingness model (PWM) along with moral norm to examine key predictors of people's willingness to participate in living organ (kidney) donation within an exchange programme based on a hypothetical scenario. Given the recent introduction of a national exchange programme, participants (<i>N</i> = 147) were adult Australians with no current conditions affecting organ donation eligibility. Hierarchical multiple regression analysis showed attitudes towards organ donation and similarity to a typical organ donor significantly contributed to people's willingness to donate their kidney via an exchange programme. Moral norm, the personal belief that organ donation is a moral obligation, also predicted willingness. Willingness to donate in an exchange programme is more closely tied to one's personal attitude, self-image (similarity to a typical donor) and moral obligation than any external social pressures. Given their increasing prevalence, future research should continue to explore individuals' motivations for donating in exchange programes which are crucial for enhancing donor recruitment efforts to save lives.</p>","PeriodicalId":54535,"journal":{"name":"Psychology Health & Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"2312-2327"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology Health & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2025.2528116","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Living organ donation through exchange programmes, where donors are anonymously matched with recipients, is a growing practice that addresses compatibility barriers in transplantation. However, limited research explores predictors influencing individuals' willingness to engage in such programmes. This study used the prototype willingness model (PWM) along with moral norm to examine key predictors of people's willingness to participate in living organ (kidney) donation within an exchange programme based on a hypothetical scenario. Given the recent introduction of a national exchange programme, participants (N = 147) were adult Australians with no current conditions affecting organ donation eligibility. Hierarchical multiple regression analysis showed attitudes towards organ donation and similarity to a typical organ donor significantly contributed to people's willingness to donate their kidney via an exchange programme. Moral norm, the personal belief that organ donation is a moral obligation, also predicted willingness. Willingness to donate in an exchange programme is more closely tied to one's personal attitude, self-image (similarity to a typical donor) and moral obligation than any external social pressures. Given their increasing prevalence, future research should continue to explore individuals' motivations for donating in exchange programes which are crucial for enhancing donor recruitment efforts to save lives.

什么因素决定人们是否愿意捐赠肾脏作为器官交换计划的一部分?
通过交换计划进行活体器官捐赠,即匿名匹配供体与受者,是一种日益流行的做法,可解决移植中的兼容性障碍。然而,有限的研究探讨了影响个人参与此类计划意愿的预测因素。本研究利用原型意愿模型(PWM)和道德规范,在一个假设情景的交换计划中,考察了人们参与活体器官(肾脏)捐赠意愿的关键预测因素。考虑到最近引入的国家交换计划,参与者(N = 147)是成年澳大利亚人,目前没有影响器官捐赠资格的条件。分层多元回归分析显示,人们对器官捐赠的态度和与典型器官捐赠者的相似性显著促进了人们通过交换计划捐献肾脏的意愿。道德规范,即认为器官捐献是一种道德义务的个人信念,也能预测捐献意愿。在交换项目中捐赠的意愿与个人态度、自我形象(与典型捐赠者相似)和道德义务的关系比任何外部社会压力更密切。鉴于其日益普遍,未来的研究应继续探索个人在交换计划中捐赠的动机,这对于加强捐助者招募工作以拯救生命至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychology Health & Medicine
Psychology Health & Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
200
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Psychology, Health & Medicine is a multidisciplinary journal highlighting human factors in health. The journal provides a peer reviewed forum to report on issues of psychology and health in practice. This key publication reaches an international audience, highlighting the variation and similarities within different settings and exploring multiple health and illness issues from theoretical, practical and management perspectives. It provides a critical forum to examine the wide range of applied health and illness issues and how they incorporate psychological knowledge, understanding, theory and intervention. The journal reflects the growing recognition of psychosocial issues as they affect health planning, medical care, disease reaction, intervention, quality of life, adjustment adaptation and management. For many years theoretical research was very distant from applied understanding. The emerging movement in health psychology, changes in medical care provision and training, and consumer awareness of health issues all contribute to a growing need for applied research. This journal focuses on practical applications of theory, research and experience and provides a bridge between academic knowledge, illness experience, wellbeing and health care practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书