Removal of the "dog-ear" during laparoscopic anterior resection with double stapling technique reduces the anastomotic leakage: a prospective cohort study.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
S Liu, J Guo, Z Cheng, M Wei, Z Dong, Z Nie, K Zhou, W Yu, Y Wang, Z Yan
{"title":"Removal of the \"dog-ear\" during laparoscopic anterior resection with double stapling technique reduces the anastomotic leakage: a prospective cohort study.","authors":"S Liu, J Guo, Z Cheng, M Wei, Z Dong, Z Nie, K Zhou, W Yu, Y Wang, Z Yan","doi":"10.1007/s10151-025-03178-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In laparoscopic preresection, the use of double anastomosis techniques creates a potential anastomotic angle (called a \"dog-ear\"), which represents an area with a high incidence of anastomotic leakage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective study, conducted from July 2022 to July 2023, ultimately included 471 patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery using dual anastomosis techniques. Among them, 179 patients had one or two stapled corners removed during the surgery using a modified double stapling technique (MDST), while 292 patients did not have stapled corners removed during surgery using the traditional double stapler technique (DST). The incidence of anastomotic fistula and the probability of anastomotic bleeding within 30 days after operation were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the surgery, 179 patients had one or two dog-ears removed, constituting the MDST group (n = 179). The remaining 292 patients did not have a dog-ear removed, constituting the no dog-ear removal group (DST group, n = 292). Statistical analysis revealed a significant difference between the two groups in terms of anastomotic leakage (6 [3.4%] vs 23 [7.9%]; relative risk 0.426; 95% CI 0.177-1.025; p = 0.047). Additionally, a significant difference was observed in preventing anastomotic bleeding by removing one or both dog-ears (7 [3.9%] vs 30 [10.3%], relative risk 0.381; 95% CI 0.171-0.848; p = 0.013).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This prospective study indicates that removing one or both dog-ears during surgery is beneficial in preventing anastomotic leakage and anastomotic bleeding.</p>","PeriodicalId":51192,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Coloproctology","volume":"29 1","pages":"143"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12274248/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Techniques in Coloproctology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-025-03178-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In laparoscopic preresection, the use of double anastomosis techniques creates a potential anastomotic angle (called a "dog-ear"), which represents an area with a high incidence of anastomotic leakage.

Methods: This prospective study, conducted from July 2022 to July 2023, ultimately included 471 patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery using dual anastomosis techniques. Among them, 179 patients had one or two stapled corners removed during the surgery using a modified double stapling technique (MDST), while 292 patients did not have stapled corners removed during surgery using the traditional double stapler technique (DST). The incidence of anastomotic fistula and the probability of anastomotic bleeding within 30 days after operation were analyzed.

Results: In the surgery, 179 patients had one or two dog-ears removed, constituting the MDST group (n = 179). The remaining 292 patients did not have a dog-ear removed, constituting the no dog-ear removal group (DST group, n = 292). Statistical analysis revealed a significant difference between the two groups in terms of anastomotic leakage (6 [3.4%] vs 23 [7.9%]; relative risk 0.426; 95% CI 0.177-1.025; p = 0.047). Additionally, a significant difference was observed in preventing anastomotic bleeding by removing one or both dog-ears (7 [3.9%] vs 30 [10.3%], relative risk 0.381; 95% CI 0.171-0.848; p = 0.013).

Conclusions: This prospective study indicates that removing one or both dog-ears during surgery is beneficial in preventing anastomotic leakage and anastomotic bleeding.

在腹腔镜前切除术中,双吻合器技术切除“狗耳”可减少吻合口漏:一项前瞻性队列研究。
背景:在腹腔镜预切除术中,双重吻合技术的使用产生了一个潜在的吻合角(称为“狗耳”),这代表了一个吻合口漏高发的区域。方法:这项前瞻性研究于2022年7月至2023年7月进行,最终纳入471例采用双吻合技术进行腹腔镜结直肠癌手术的患者。其中179例患者术中采用改良双吻合器技术(MDST)切除了一个或两个钉角,292例患者术中采用传统双吻合器技术(DST)未切除钉角。分析术后30天内吻合口瘘发生率及吻合口出血发生率。结果:手术中切除1 ~ 2只狗耳179例,构成MDST组(n = 179)。其余292例患者未切除狗耳,构成不切除狗耳组(DST组,n = 292)。两组吻合口瘘发生率分别为6例[3.4%]和23例[7.9%],差异有统计学意义;相对危险度0.426;95% ci 0.177-1.025;p = 0.047)。此外,通过切除一只或两只狗耳预防吻合口出血的差异有统计学意义(7 [3.9%]vs 30[10.3%],相对风险0.381;95% ci 0.171-0.848;p = 0.013)。结论:本前瞻性研究提示术中切除一只或两只狗耳有利于防止吻合口瘘和吻合口出血。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Techniques in Coloproctology
Techniques in Coloproctology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
176
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Techniques in Coloproctology is an international journal fully devoted to diagnostic and operative procedures carried out in the management of colorectal diseases. Imaging, clinical physiology, laparoscopy, open abdominal surgery and proctoperineology are the main topics covered by the journal. Reviews, original articles, technical notes and short communications with many detailed illustrations render this publication indispensable for coloproctologists and related specialists. Both surgeons and gastroenterologists are represented on the distinguished Editorial Board, together with pathologists, radiologists and basic scientists from all over the world. The journal is strongly recommended to those who wish to be updated on recent developments in the field, and improve the standards of their work. Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been reviewed by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in an appropriate version of the 1965 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted. Reports of animal experiments must state that the Principles of Laboratory Animal Care (NIH publication no. 86-23 revised 1985) were followed as were applicable national laws (e.g. the current version of the German Law on the Protection of Animals). The Editor-in-Chief reserves the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the above-mentioned requirements. Authors will be held responsible for false statements or for failure to fulfill such requirements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信