Removal of the "dog-ear" during laparoscopic anterior resection with double stapling technique reduces the anastomotic leakage: a prospective cohort study.
S Liu, J Guo, Z Cheng, M Wei, Z Dong, Z Nie, K Zhou, W Yu, Y Wang, Z Yan
{"title":"Removal of the \"dog-ear\" during laparoscopic anterior resection with double stapling technique reduces the anastomotic leakage: a prospective cohort study.","authors":"S Liu, J Guo, Z Cheng, M Wei, Z Dong, Z Nie, K Zhou, W Yu, Y Wang, Z Yan","doi":"10.1007/s10151-025-03178-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In laparoscopic preresection, the use of double anastomosis techniques creates a potential anastomotic angle (called a \"dog-ear\"), which represents an area with a high incidence of anastomotic leakage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective study, conducted from July 2022 to July 2023, ultimately included 471 patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery using dual anastomosis techniques. Among them, 179 patients had one or two stapled corners removed during the surgery using a modified double stapling technique (MDST), while 292 patients did not have stapled corners removed during surgery using the traditional double stapler technique (DST). The incidence of anastomotic fistula and the probability of anastomotic bleeding within 30 days after operation were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the surgery, 179 patients had one or two dog-ears removed, constituting the MDST group (n = 179). The remaining 292 patients did not have a dog-ear removed, constituting the no dog-ear removal group (DST group, n = 292). Statistical analysis revealed a significant difference between the two groups in terms of anastomotic leakage (6 [3.4%] vs 23 [7.9%]; relative risk 0.426; 95% CI 0.177-1.025; p = 0.047). Additionally, a significant difference was observed in preventing anastomotic bleeding by removing one or both dog-ears (7 [3.9%] vs 30 [10.3%], relative risk 0.381; 95% CI 0.171-0.848; p = 0.013).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This prospective study indicates that removing one or both dog-ears during surgery is beneficial in preventing anastomotic leakage and anastomotic bleeding.</p>","PeriodicalId":51192,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Coloproctology","volume":"29 1","pages":"143"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12274248/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Techniques in Coloproctology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-025-03178-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: In laparoscopic preresection, the use of double anastomosis techniques creates a potential anastomotic angle (called a "dog-ear"), which represents an area with a high incidence of anastomotic leakage.
Methods: This prospective study, conducted from July 2022 to July 2023, ultimately included 471 patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery using dual anastomosis techniques. Among them, 179 patients had one or two stapled corners removed during the surgery using a modified double stapling technique (MDST), while 292 patients did not have stapled corners removed during surgery using the traditional double stapler technique (DST). The incidence of anastomotic fistula and the probability of anastomotic bleeding within 30 days after operation were analyzed.
Results: In the surgery, 179 patients had one or two dog-ears removed, constituting the MDST group (n = 179). The remaining 292 patients did not have a dog-ear removed, constituting the no dog-ear removal group (DST group, n = 292). Statistical analysis revealed a significant difference between the two groups in terms of anastomotic leakage (6 [3.4%] vs 23 [7.9%]; relative risk 0.426; 95% CI 0.177-1.025; p = 0.047). Additionally, a significant difference was observed in preventing anastomotic bleeding by removing one or both dog-ears (7 [3.9%] vs 30 [10.3%], relative risk 0.381; 95% CI 0.171-0.848; p = 0.013).
Conclusions: This prospective study indicates that removing one or both dog-ears during surgery is beneficial in preventing anastomotic leakage and anastomotic bleeding.
期刊介绍:
Techniques in Coloproctology is an international journal fully devoted to diagnostic and operative procedures carried out in the management of colorectal diseases. Imaging, clinical physiology, laparoscopy, open abdominal surgery and proctoperineology are the main topics covered by the journal. Reviews, original articles, technical notes and short communications with many detailed illustrations render this publication indispensable for coloproctologists and related specialists. Both surgeons and gastroenterologists are represented on the distinguished Editorial Board, together with pathologists, radiologists and basic scientists from all over the world. The journal is strongly recommended to those who wish to be updated on recent developments in the field, and improve the standards of their work.
Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been reviewed by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in an appropriate version of the 1965 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted. Reports of animal experiments must state that the Principles of Laboratory Animal Care (NIH publication no. 86-23 revised 1985) were followed as were applicable national laws (e.g. the current version of the German Law on the Protection of Animals). The Editor-in-Chief reserves the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the above-mentioned requirements. Authors will be held responsible for false statements or for failure to fulfill such requirements.