Engagement in and correlates of total cutaneous exams and skin self-exams among young melanoma survivors and their family.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Sharon L Manne, Deborah A Kashy, Sherry Pagoto, Susan K Peterson, Carolyn J Heckman, Joseph Gallo, Adam Berger, David B Buller, Alexandria Kulik, Sara Frederick, Morgan Pesanelli
{"title":"Engagement in and correlates of total cutaneous exams and skin self-exams among young melanoma survivors and their family.","authors":"Sharon L Manne, Deborah A Kashy, Sherry Pagoto, Susan K Peterson, Carolyn J Heckman, Joseph Gallo, Adam Berger, David B Buller, Alexandria Kulik, Sara Frederick, Morgan Pesanelli","doi":"10.1007/s10865-025-00589-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Young adult melanoma survivors and their close family (first degree relatives/FDRs) are at increased risk for developing a melanoma, but little is known about engagement in and correlates of their clinical skin exam (CSE) and skin self-examination (SSE) behaviors. Five hundred and seventy-four YA survivors and their FDRs completed an online survey assessing engagement in CSE and SSE, as well as measures of background factors, cognitive and psychosocial factors, CSE and SSE planning, and family influences. Approximately 90% of YAs had a CSE and 90% performed SSE in the last year, but engagement in CSE among FDRs was lower (63.2%, CSE; 64.9%, SSE). For CSE, females, a physician recommendation, fewer barriers, and more planning were associated with CSE. Family influences were not associated with CSE. For SSE, a physician recommendation and greater self-efficacy were associated with engagement, and more comprehensive SSE was associated with a physician recommendation, lower education, greater self-efficacy, and more planning. Stronger family normative influences were associated with more comprehensive SSEs among males. Findings suggest FDRs may benefit from interventions to improve CSE and SSE and indicate that physician recommendation may be a key intervention target to foster CSE and SSE.</p>","PeriodicalId":48329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-025-00589-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Young adult melanoma survivors and their close family (first degree relatives/FDRs) are at increased risk for developing a melanoma, but little is known about engagement in and correlates of their clinical skin exam (CSE) and skin self-examination (SSE) behaviors. Five hundred and seventy-four YA survivors and their FDRs completed an online survey assessing engagement in CSE and SSE, as well as measures of background factors, cognitive and psychosocial factors, CSE and SSE planning, and family influences. Approximately 90% of YAs had a CSE and 90% performed SSE in the last year, but engagement in CSE among FDRs was lower (63.2%, CSE; 64.9%, SSE). For CSE, females, a physician recommendation, fewer barriers, and more planning were associated with CSE. Family influences were not associated with CSE. For SSE, a physician recommendation and greater self-efficacy were associated with engagement, and more comprehensive SSE was associated with a physician recommendation, lower education, greater self-efficacy, and more planning. Stronger family normative influences were associated with more comprehensive SSEs among males. Findings suggest FDRs may benefit from interventions to improve CSE and SSE and indicate that physician recommendation may be a key intervention target to foster CSE and SSE.

年轻黑色素瘤幸存者及其家人参与全面皮肤检查和皮肤自我检查及其相关性
年轻成年黑色素瘤幸存者及其近亲(一级亲属/FDRs)患黑色素瘤的风险增加,但对其临床皮肤检查(CSE)和皮肤自检(SSE)行为的参与及其相关性知之甚少。574名YA幸存者和他们的fdr完成了一项在线调查,评估了CSE和SSE的参与程度,以及背景因素、认知和社会心理因素、CSE和SSE计划和家庭影响的测量。在去年,大约90%的私募股权投资公司有CSE, 90%的私募股权投资公司执行了SSE,但私募股权投资公司参与CSE的比例较低(63.2%,CSE;64.9%, SSE)。对于CSE,女性,医生建议,较少的障碍和更多的计划与CSE相关。家庭影响与CSE无关。对于SSE,医生推荐和更高的自我效能感与敬业度相关,而更全面的SSE与医生推荐、更低的教育程度、更高的自我效能感和更多的计划相关。在男性中,更强的家庭规范影响与更全面的社会行为相关。研究结果表明,fdr可能受益于改善CSE和SSE的干预措施,并表明医生推荐可能是促进CSE和SSE的关键干预目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Behavioral Medicine
Journal of Behavioral Medicine PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
3.20%
发文量
112
期刊介绍: The Journal of Behavioral Medicine is a broadly conceived interdisciplinary publication devoted to furthering understanding of physical health and illness through the knowledge, methods, and techniques of behavioral science. A significant function of the journal is the application of this knowledge to prevention, treatment, and rehabilitation and to the promotion of health at the individual, community, and population levels.The content of the journal spans all areas of basic and applied behavioral medicine research, conducted in and informed by all related disciplines including but not limited to: psychology, medicine, the public health sciences, sociology, anthropology, health economics, nursing, and biostatistics. Topics welcomed include but are not limited to: prevention of disease and health promotion; the effects of psychological stress on physical and psychological functioning; sociocultural influences on health and illness; adherence to medical regimens; the study of health related behaviors including tobacco use, substance use, sexual behavior, physical activity, and obesity; health services research; and behavioral factors in the prevention and treatment of somatic disorders.  Reports of interdisciplinary approaches to research are particularly welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信