[Setting up of practices by general practitioners in Bavaria with a special focus on bureaucratic processes].

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Fabian Walter, Katharina Maier, Marco Roos, Klara Lorenz-Dant
{"title":"[Setting up of practices by general practitioners in Bavaria with a special focus on bureaucratic processes].","authors":"Fabian Walter, Katharina Maier, Marco Roos, Klara Lorenz-Dant","doi":"10.1055/a-2637-3305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The demand for GP care is increasing while the number of GPs is decreasing. We investigated how GPs perceive bureaucracy during the process of establishing their own practice and how this perception changes with increasing establishment experience.Physicians who wished to set up a practice or who were in the process of setting up a practice and those who, up to two years and two to five years previously, had set up a GP practice were interviewed digitally following an interview guide. The recordings were transcribed verbatim and analysed using Braun & Clarkes Thematic Analysis.The 18 interviewees identified \"bureaucracy\" in various areas unrelated to patient care. A habituation effect occurs after the practice has been established. Resources for coping with bureaucratic challenges were mentioned.The participants define bureaucracy as any activity that is distant from the patient. Dealing with this should be made easier despite the habituation that occurs. Electronic processes and support through advice can help to overcome bureaucratic hurdles, and positive examples mentioned should be systematised. GPs view bureaucracy as a hurdle to setting up a practice, but it does not influence their decision to establish their own practice. Therefore, while still relevant, bureaucracy is found to be less important than previous research suggests.</p>","PeriodicalId":47653,"journal":{"name":"Gesundheitswesen","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gesundheitswesen","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2637-3305","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The demand for GP care is increasing while the number of GPs is decreasing. We investigated how GPs perceive bureaucracy during the process of establishing their own practice and how this perception changes with increasing establishment experience.Physicians who wished to set up a practice or who were in the process of setting up a practice and those who, up to two years and two to five years previously, had set up a GP practice were interviewed digitally following an interview guide. The recordings were transcribed verbatim and analysed using Braun & Clarkes Thematic Analysis.The 18 interviewees identified "bureaucracy" in various areas unrelated to patient care. A habituation effect occurs after the practice has been established. Resources for coping with bureaucratic challenges were mentioned.The participants define bureaucracy as any activity that is distant from the patient. Dealing with this should be made easier despite the habituation that occurs. Electronic processes and support through advice can help to overcome bureaucratic hurdles, and positive examples mentioned should be systematised. GPs view bureaucracy as a hurdle to setting up a practice, but it does not influence their decision to establish their own practice. Therefore, while still relevant, bureaucracy is found to be less important than previous research suggests.

[在巴伐利亚建立全科医生的实践,特别关注官僚程序]。
对全科医生护理的需求在增加,而全科医生的数量在减少。我们调查了全科医生在建立自己的实践过程中如何看待官僚主义,以及这种看法如何随着建立经验的增加而变化。希望开设诊所或正在开设诊所的医生,以及那些两年或两到五年前开设全科医生诊所的医生,按照采访指南进行了数字化采访。录音被逐字转录,并使用布劳恩和克拉克主题分析进行分析。18位受访者指出,在与病人护理无关的各个领域存在“官僚主义”。习惯化效应发生在实践建立之后。他们提到了应付官僚主义挑战的资源。参与者将官僚主义定义为任何远离患者的活动。处理这个问题应该更容易,尽管发生了习惯。电子程序和通过咨询提供的支持有助于克服官僚主义障碍,所提到的积极例子应加以系统化。全科医生认为官僚主义是建立诊所的障碍,但这并不影响他们建立自己诊所的决定。因此,尽管官僚主义仍然相关,但它的重要性却没有以前的研究表明的那么重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gesundheitswesen
Gesundheitswesen PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
18.20%
发文量
308
期刊介绍: The health service informs you comprehensively and up-to-date about the most important topics of the health care system. In addition to guidelines, overviews and comments, you will find current research results and contributions to CME-certified continuing education and training. The journal offers a scientific discussion forum and a platform for communications from professional societies. The content quality is ensured by a publisher body, the expert advisory board and other experts in the peer review process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信