Responding to the Needs of Dementia Care Partners: Recommendations for Policy Change at the State and Federal Levels.

IF 2 3区 社会学 Q2 GERONTOLOGY
Walter D Dawson, Jenn Reed, Allison Lindauer, Sherril B Gelmon
{"title":"Responding to the Needs of Dementia Care Partners: Recommendations for Policy Change at the State and Federal Levels.","authors":"Walter D Dawson, Jenn Reed, Allison Lindauer, Sherril B Gelmon","doi":"10.1080/08959420.2025.2523137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The need to optimize supports of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) care partners through policy innovation is high. This study sought to frame the care and support needs of multiple historically underrepresented populations who may be underserved and/or have difficulty accessing culturally specific services and determine specific policies that may reduce ADRD care partner burden and improve wellbeing. Qualitative data were gathered through interviews (<i>N</i> = 24) with leaders of organizations that support people living with ADRD and focus groups (<i>N</i> = 5) with dementia care partners from four communities historically underserved in the United States (Asian, Black, Indigenous, and Latinx). Organizational leaders also participated in a modified Delphi process to identify priorities for supporting care partners. Multiple themes were identified including: information resources; navigation and coordination within and across systems; access to clinicians, care teams, health/personal records; legal and financial issues; in-home and respite care; psychological and physical health support for care partners; and flexibility of schedules. Policy-related priorities for supporting care partners informed development of specific policy recommendations related to financing, supports, and respite. State and national policies can be enhanced to address these priorities across populations in ADRD care partner supports, especially for historically underserved groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":47121,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aging & Social Policy","volume":" ","pages":"1-21"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aging & Social Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2025.2523137","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The need to optimize supports of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) care partners through policy innovation is high. This study sought to frame the care and support needs of multiple historically underrepresented populations who may be underserved and/or have difficulty accessing culturally specific services and determine specific policies that may reduce ADRD care partner burden and improve wellbeing. Qualitative data were gathered through interviews (N = 24) with leaders of organizations that support people living with ADRD and focus groups (N = 5) with dementia care partners from four communities historically underserved in the United States (Asian, Black, Indigenous, and Latinx). Organizational leaders also participated in a modified Delphi process to identify priorities for supporting care partners. Multiple themes were identified including: information resources; navigation and coordination within and across systems; access to clinicians, care teams, health/personal records; legal and financial issues; in-home and respite care; psychological and physical health support for care partners; and flexibility of schedules. Policy-related priorities for supporting care partners informed development of specific policy recommendations related to financing, supports, and respite. State and national policies can be enhanced to address these priorities across populations in ADRD care partner supports, especially for historically underserved groups.

响应痴呆症护理伙伴的需求:在州和联邦层面的政策变化建议。
通过政策创新优化对阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆(ADRD)护理合作伙伴的支持的必要性很高。本研究旨在确定多个历史上代表性不足的人群的护理和支持需求,这些人群可能得不到充分的服务和/或难以获得特定文化的服务,并确定可能减轻ADRD护理伙伴负担和改善福祉的具体政策。通过访谈(N = 24)支持ADRD患者的组织领导人和焦点小组(N = 5)与来自美国历史上服务不足的四个社区(亚洲人、黑人、土著和拉丁裔)的痴呆症护理伙伴收集定性数据。组织领导人还参与了修改后的德尔菲过程,以确定支持护理合作伙伴的优先事项。确定了多个主题,包括:信息资源;系统内部和系统之间的导航和协调;获得临床医生、护理小组、健康/个人记录;法律和财务问题;家庭护理和临时护理;为护理伙伴提供心理和身体健康支助;以及灵活的日程安排。支持护理合作伙伴的政策优先事项为制定与融资、支持和缓解有关的具体政策建议提供了信息。可以加强州和国家政策,在ADRD护理合作伙伴支持的人群中解决这些优先事项,特别是对历史上服务不足的群体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
3.90%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: The Journal of Aging & Social Policy offers a platform for insightful contributions from an international and interdisciplinary group of policy analysts and scholars. It provides an in-depth examination and analysis of critical phenomena that impact aging and the development and implementation of programs for the elderly from a global perspective, with a broad scope that encompasses not only the United States but also regions including Europe, the Middle East, Australia, Latin America, Asia, and the Asia-Pacific rim. The journal regularly addresses a wide array of issues such as long-term services and supports, home- and community-based care, nursing-home care, assisted living, long-term care financing, financial security, employment and training, public and private pension coverage, housing, transportation, health care access, financing, and quality, family dynamics, and retirement. These topics are of significant importance to the field of aging and social policy, reflecting the journal's commitment to presenting a comprehensive view of the challenges and solutions related to aging populations around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信