O Radulova-Mauersberger, F Oehme, N Mibelli, C Teske, G Krause-Jüttler, J Weitz, M Distler, S Hempel
{"title":"Does perioperative hydrocortisone reduce morbidity after pancreatoduodenectomy? A propensity score matched analysis.","authors":"O Radulova-Mauersberger, F Oehme, N Mibelli, C Teske, G Krause-Jüttler, J Weitz, M Distler, S Hempel","doi":"10.1007/s13304-025-02280-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The use of steroids in pancreatic surgery may reduce complications through the anti-inflammatory potential. We aimed to evaluate the impact of hydrocortisone (HC) on postoperative morbidity after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). The data were retrospectively extracted from a prospective clinical database. Complicatons after PD with 100 mg HC intravenously (i.v.) for 48 h and a corresponding propensity score-matched cohort without HC were evaluated by using logistic regression analyses. We analyzed 691 patients who underwent PD over a period of ten years. After propensity score matching, 220 patients (110 patients in each group) remained. Postoperative complications were comparable in both groups (p = 0.56). Major complications (CDC ≥ 3) did not differ significantly, n = 44 (40%) for non-HC n = 45 (40.9%) and HC group (p = 0.89). There was no difference (p = 0.88) in the POPF incidence, non-HC, n = 31 (28.2%) and HC group, n = 30 (27.3%). After stratifying for fistula risk score (FRS), results remained equal and no difference was observed in CDC ≥ 3 in the low (p = 1), intermediate (p = 0.82) and high-risk (p = 0.74) group. HC has been suggested to be effective in reducing postoperative morbidity, but the evidence is controversial. The benefit of HC in reducing postoperative complications after pancreatoduodenectomy cannot be supported in the present study.</p>","PeriodicalId":23391,"journal":{"name":"Updates in Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Updates in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-025-02280-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The use of steroids in pancreatic surgery may reduce complications through the anti-inflammatory potential. We aimed to evaluate the impact of hydrocortisone (HC) on postoperative morbidity after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). The data were retrospectively extracted from a prospective clinical database. Complicatons after PD with 100 mg HC intravenously (i.v.) for 48 h and a corresponding propensity score-matched cohort without HC were evaluated by using logistic regression analyses. We analyzed 691 patients who underwent PD over a period of ten years. After propensity score matching, 220 patients (110 patients in each group) remained. Postoperative complications were comparable in both groups (p = 0.56). Major complications (CDC ≥ 3) did not differ significantly, n = 44 (40%) for non-HC n = 45 (40.9%) and HC group (p = 0.89). There was no difference (p = 0.88) in the POPF incidence, non-HC, n = 31 (28.2%) and HC group, n = 30 (27.3%). After stratifying for fistula risk score (FRS), results remained equal and no difference was observed in CDC ≥ 3 in the low (p = 1), intermediate (p = 0.82) and high-risk (p = 0.74) group. HC has been suggested to be effective in reducing postoperative morbidity, but the evidence is controversial. The benefit of HC in reducing postoperative complications after pancreatoduodenectomy cannot be supported in the present study.
期刊介绍:
Updates in Surgery (UPIS) has been founded in 2010 as the official journal of the Italian Society of Surgery. It’s an international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the surgical sciences. Its main goal is to offer a valuable update on the most recent developments of those surgical techniques that are rapidly evolving, forcing the community of surgeons to a rigorous debate and a continuous refinement of standards of care. In this respect position papers on the mostly debated surgical approaches and accreditation criteria have been published and are welcome for the future.
Beside its focus on general surgery, the journal draws particular attention to cutting edge topics and emerging surgical fields that are publishing in monothematic issues guest edited by well-known experts.
Updates in Surgery has been considering various types of papers: editorials, comprehensive reviews, original studies and technical notes related to specific surgical procedures and techniques on liver, colorectal, gastric, pancreatic, robotic and bariatric surgery.