Can non-pharmacological interventions change levels of neurofilament light in older adults at risk of dementia? A secondary analysis of the SCD-Well randomized clinical trial.

IF 7.8 Q2 BUSINESS
Lehané Masebo, Tim Whitfield, Harriet Demnitz-King, Amanda Heslegrave, Géraldine Poisnel, Antoine Lutz, Eric Frison, Miranka Wirth, Abdul Hye, Frank Jessen, Nicholas J Ashton, Henrik Zetterberg, Natalie L Marchant
{"title":"Can non-pharmacological interventions change levels of neurofilament light in older adults at risk of dementia? A secondary analysis of the SCD-Well randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Lehané Masebo, Tim Whitfield, Harriet Demnitz-King, Amanda Heslegrave, Géraldine Poisnel, Antoine Lutz, Eric Frison, Miranka Wirth, Abdul Hye, Frank Jessen, Nicholas J Ashton, Henrik Zetterberg, Natalie L Marchant","doi":"10.1016/j.tjpad.2025.100299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Older adults with subjective cognitive decline (SCD) and/or elevated neurofilament light (NfL), a neurodegeneration biomarker, are at increased risk of dementia. Non-pharmacological interventions offer a promising strategy for reducing dementia risk, yet none have utilized NfL as a marker of response in dementia prevention trials.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the effects of two non-pharmacological interventions on NfL in older adults with SCD.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>SCD-Well was an 8-week observer-blinded, randomized, clinical trial with 6-month follow-up, and was a part of the Horizon 2020 European Union-funded \"Medit-Ageing\" project. Data were analyzed from June 2022 to August 2024.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Memory clinics at four sites in France, Germany, Spain, and UK.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Participants were enrolled from March 2017 to January 2018 after fulfilling SCD research criteria and performing within the normal range on cognitive testing. Of the 147 participants enrolled, 140 were included in this secondary analysis (7 did not consent to venipuncture).</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Participants were randomly allocated to the Caring Mindfulness-Based Approach for Seniors (CMBAS) intervention or a structurally matched Health Self-Management Program (HSMP).</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>Plasma NfL was measured at baseline (V1), post-intervention (V2), and 6-month follow-up (V3), using Single molecule array technology, and log-transformed for analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>137 older adults with SCD provided NfL data (mean [SD] age: 72.7 [6.8] years; 62.0 % female; CMBAS, n = 70; HSMP, n = 67). NfL data were available at V1 (n = 136), V2 (n = 119) and V3 (n = 115). The visit-by-arm interaction was not statistically significant, and no significant changes in NfL were observed within the CMBAS or HSMP arms from V1 to V2. However, within the HSMP arm, NfL levels reduced from V1 to V3 (-0.10, 95 % confidence interval [-0.18 to -0.02]). Modified intention-to-treat analyses, which included 140 participants, supported these findings, and additionally recorded significant reductions in the HSMP arm from V1 to V2 (n = 140, -0.07 [-0.14 to -0.00]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study, NfL levels were reduced at 6-month follow-up after a health self-management program. Future interventions with longer duration, extended follow-up and clinical endpoints will help clarify whether NfL reductions are sustained over extended timeframes and translate to lower dementia incidence.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: (NCT03005652).</p>","PeriodicalId":22711,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":" ","pages":"100299"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12413708/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjpad.2025.100299","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Older adults with subjective cognitive decline (SCD) and/or elevated neurofilament light (NfL), a neurodegeneration biomarker, are at increased risk of dementia. Non-pharmacological interventions offer a promising strategy for reducing dementia risk, yet none have utilized NfL as a marker of response in dementia prevention trials.

Objective: To investigate the effects of two non-pharmacological interventions on NfL in older adults with SCD.

Design: SCD-Well was an 8-week observer-blinded, randomized, clinical trial with 6-month follow-up, and was a part of the Horizon 2020 European Union-funded "Medit-Ageing" project. Data were analyzed from June 2022 to August 2024.

Setting: Memory clinics at four sites in France, Germany, Spain, and UK.

Participants: Participants were enrolled from March 2017 to January 2018 after fulfilling SCD research criteria and performing within the normal range on cognitive testing. Of the 147 participants enrolled, 140 were included in this secondary analysis (7 did not consent to venipuncture).

Interventions: Participants were randomly allocated to the Caring Mindfulness-Based Approach for Seniors (CMBAS) intervention or a structurally matched Health Self-Management Program (HSMP).

Measurements: Plasma NfL was measured at baseline (V1), post-intervention (V2), and 6-month follow-up (V3), using Single molecule array technology, and log-transformed for analyses.

Results: 137 older adults with SCD provided NfL data (mean [SD] age: 72.7 [6.8] years; 62.0 % female; CMBAS, n = 70; HSMP, n = 67). NfL data were available at V1 (n = 136), V2 (n = 119) and V3 (n = 115). The visit-by-arm interaction was not statistically significant, and no significant changes in NfL were observed within the CMBAS or HSMP arms from V1 to V2. However, within the HSMP arm, NfL levels reduced from V1 to V3 (-0.10, 95 % confidence interval [-0.18 to -0.02]). Modified intention-to-treat analyses, which included 140 participants, supported these findings, and additionally recorded significant reductions in the HSMP arm from V1 to V2 (n = 140, -0.07 [-0.14 to -0.00]).

Conclusions: In this study, NfL levels were reduced at 6-month follow-up after a health self-management program. Future interventions with longer duration, extended follow-up and clinical endpoints will help clarify whether NfL reductions are sustained over extended timeframes and translate to lower dementia incidence.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: (NCT03005652).

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

非药物干预能否改变有痴呆风险的老年人的神经丝光水平?SCD-Well随机临床试验的二次分析。
背景:主观认知能力下降(SCD)和/或神经退行性生物标志物神经丝光(NfL)升高的老年人患痴呆的风险增加。非药物干预为降低痴呆风险提供了一种有希望的策略,但在痴呆预防试验中,还没有人利用NfL作为反应的标志。目的:探讨两种非药物干预对老年SCD患者NfL的影响。设计:SCD-Well是一项为期8周的观察盲、随机、临床试验,随访6个月,是欧盟资助的地平线2020“medit - aging”项目的一部分。数据分析时间为2022年6月至2024年8月。环境:记忆诊所在法国、德国、西班牙和英国的四个地点。参与者:参与者于2017年3月至2018年1月在符合SCD研究标准并在正常范围内进行认知测试后入组。在纳入的147名参与者中,140人被纳入了这一次要分析(7人不同意静脉穿刺)。干预措施:参与者被随机分配到老年人关爱正念方法(CMBAS)干预或结构匹配的健康自我管理计划(HSMP)。测量方法:采用单分子阵列技术,在基线(V1)、干预后(V2)和6个月随访(V3)时测量血浆NfL,并进行对数转换分析。结果:137例老年SCD患者提供了NfL数据(平均[SD]年龄:72.7[6.8]岁;女性占62.0%;CMBAS, n = 70;HSMP, n = 67)。在V1 (n = 136)、V2 (n = 119)和V3 (n = 115)处可获得NfL数据。臂访相互作用无统计学意义,CMBAS或HSMP臂从V1到V2未观察到NfL的显著变化。然而,在HSMP组中,NfL水平从V1降至V3(-0.10, 95%置信区间[-0.18至-0.02])。修改意向治疗分析,包括140名参与者,支持这些发现,并记录了HSMP组从V1到V2的显著减少(n = 140, -0.07[-0.14至-0.00])。结论:在本研究中,在健康自我管理计划后的6个月随访中,NfL水平降低。未来更长的持续时间、更长的随访和临床终点的干预措施将有助于澄清NfL的减少是否能在更长的时间框架内持续下去,并转化为更低的痴呆发病率。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:(NCT03005652)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease
The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The JPAD Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer’Disease will publish reviews, original research articles and short reports to improve our knowledge in the field of Alzheimer prevention including: neurosciences, biomarkers, imaging, epidemiology, public health, physical cognitive exercise, nutrition, risk and protective factors, drug development, trials design, and heath economic outcomes.JPAD will publish also the meeting abstracts from Clinical Trial on Alzheimer Disease (CTAD) and will be distributed both in paper and online version worldwide.We hope that JPAD with your contribution will play a role in the development of Alzheimer prevention.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信