Gabapentinoids for Neuropathic Pain After Spinal Cord Injury: An Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Pain Practice Pub Date : 2025-09-01 DOI:10.1111/papr.70060
Rafael Batista João, Jilly Octoria Tagore Chan, Ewen Shengyao Huang, Genesis Pamela Mora Rosas, Aníbal Valencia Vasquez, Sanjana Thota, Julyana Medeiros Dantas
{"title":"Gabapentinoids for Neuropathic Pain After Spinal Cord Injury: An Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Rafael Batista João, Jilly Octoria Tagore Chan, Ewen Shengyao Huang, Genesis Pamela Mora Rosas, Aníbal Valencia Vasquez, Sanjana Thota, Julyana Medeiros Dantas","doi":"10.1111/papr.70060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a debilitating condition frequently associated with chronic symptoms such as central neuropathic pain (CNP) and its related complications. Gabapentinoids are often used in the treatment of post-SCI CNP; however, the optimal management of this condition is still unclear. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of gabapentinoids compared with placebo in post-SCI patients affected by CNP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing gabapentinoids (gabapentin, pregabalin, or mirogabalin) with placebo in post-SCI patients experiencing CNP. We calculated mean differences (MD) and risk ratios (RR) for continuous and dichotomous outcomes, respectively, with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Pain was measured on a 0 to 10 numerical rating scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 5 RCTs comprising 682 patients. The mean age was 50.2 years, and 83.8% were male. When compared with placebo, patients treated with gabapentinoids experienced a significant decrease in average daily pain (MD -1.75; 95% CI: -3.23 to -0.28; p = 0.02) and pain-related sleep interference (MD -0.99; 95% CI: -1.38 to -0.60; p < 0.001). Additionally, there were higher proportions of individuals with pain intensity relief ≥ 50% (RR 2.19; 95% CI: 1.47 to 3.25; p < 0.001) and with at least some perceived improvement on the clinical global impression scale (RR 1.71; 95% CI: 1.34 to 2.18, p < 0.001) in the gabapentinoids group compared to the placebo group. However, treatment with gabapentinoids was associated with a significantly increased risk of blurred vision (RR 8.55; 95% CI: 1.53 to 47.7; p = 0.02), somnolence (RR 3.77; 95% CI: 2.44 to 5.84; p < 0.001), peripheral edema (RR 2.86; 95% CI: 1.37 to 5.99; p < 0.01), and dizziness (RR 2.83; 95% CI: 1.67 to 4.78; p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this meta-analysis of RCTs evaluating patients with CNP following SCI, gabapentinoids were associated with significant improvements in pain and pain-related sleep interference compared with placebo. Nonetheless, gabapentinoids significantly increased the risk of adverse events.</p>","PeriodicalId":19974,"journal":{"name":"Pain Practice","volume":"25 7","pages":"e70060"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/papr.70060","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aim: Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a debilitating condition frequently associated with chronic symptoms such as central neuropathic pain (CNP) and its related complications. Gabapentinoids are often used in the treatment of post-SCI CNP; however, the optimal management of this condition is still unclear. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of gabapentinoids compared with placebo in post-SCI patients affected by CNP.

Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing gabapentinoids (gabapentin, pregabalin, or mirogabalin) with placebo in post-SCI patients experiencing CNP. We calculated mean differences (MD) and risk ratios (RR) for continuous and dichotomous outcomes, respectively, with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Pain was measured on a 0 to 10 numerical rating scale.

Results: We included 5 RCTs comprising 682 patients. The mean age was 50.2 years, and 83.8% were male. When compared with placebo, patients treated with gabapentinoids experienced a significant decrease in average daily pain (MD -1.75; 95% CI: -3.23 to -0.28; p = 0.02) and pain-related sleep interference (MD -0.99; 95% CI: -1.38 to -0.60; p < 0.001). Additionally, there were higher proportions of individuals with pain intensity relief ≥ 50% (RR 2.19; 95% CI: 1.47 to 3.25; p < 0.001) and with at least some perceived improvement on the clinical global impression scale (RR 1.71; 95% CI: 1.34 to 2.18, p < 0.001) in the gabapentinoids group compared to the placebo group. However, treatment with gabapentinoids was associated with a significantly increased risk of blurred vision (RR 8.55; 95% CI: 1.53 to 47.7; p = 0.02), somnolence (RR 3.77; 95% CI: 2.44 to 5.84; p < 0.001), peripheral edema (RR 2.86; 95% CI: 1.37 to 5.99; p < 0.01), and dizziness (RR 2.83; 95% CI: 1.67 to 4.78; p < 0.001).

Conclusion: In this meta-analysis of RCTs evaluating patients with CNP following SCI, gabapentinoids were associated with significant improvements in pain and pain-related sleep interference compared with placebo. Nonetheless, gabapentinoids significantly increased the risk of adverse events.

加巴喷丁类药物治疗脊髓损伤后神经性疼痛:一项随机对照试验的最新meta分析。
背景和目的:脊髓损伤(SCI)是一种衰弱性疾病,常伴有慢性症状,如中枢神经性疼痛(CNP)及其相关并发症。加巴喷丁类药物常用于scinp后的治疗;然而,这种情况的最佳管理仍不清楚。本研究旨在评估加巴喷丁类药物与安慰剂在脊髓损伤后CNP患者中的疗效和安全性。方法:我们系统地检索PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆数据库,以比较加巴喷丁类药物(加巴喷丁、普瑞巴林或米罗巴林)与安慰剂在脊髓损伤后CNP患者中的疗效。我们分别计算了连续和二分类结果的平均差异(MD)和风险比(RR),置信区间为95%。疼痛以0到10的数值评定量表进行测量。结果:我们纳入了5项随机对照试验,共682例患者。平均年龄50.2岁,男性占83.8%。与安慰剂相比,加巴喷丁类药物治疗的患者平均每日疼痛显著降低(MD -1.75;95% CI: -3.23 ~ -0.28;p = 0.02)和疼痛相关睡眠干扰(MD -0.99;95% CI: -1.38 ~ -0.60;结论:在评估脊髓损伤后CNP患者的随机对照试验的荟萃分析中,与安慰剂相比,加巴喷丁类药物与疼痛和疼痛相关睡眠干扰的显著改善相关。尽管如此,加巴喷丁类药物显著增加了不良事件的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain Practice
Pain Practice ANESTHESIOLOGY-CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.80%
发文量
92
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pain Practice, the official journal of the World Institute of Pain, publishes international multidisciplinary articles on pain and analgesia that provide its readership with up-to-date research, evaluation methods, and techniques for pain management. Special sections including the Consultant’s Corner, Images in Pain Practice, Case Studies from Mayo, Tutorials, and the Evidence-Based Medicine combine to give pain researchers, pain clinicians and pain fellows in training a systematic approach to continuing education in pain medicine. Prior to publication, all articles and reviews undergo peer review by at least two experts in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信