The views of older people on community-based multi-disciplinary team caseloads and informal carers about health and care services in two Integrated Care Pioneer sites in England.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Mary Alison Durand, Lavanya Thana, Mustafa Al-Haboubi, Agata Pacho, Lucia Rehackova, Gerald Wistow, Nick Douglas, Nicholas Mays
{"title":"The views of older people on community-based multi-disciplinary team caseloads and informal carers about health and care services in two Integrated Care Pioneer sites in England.","authors":"Mary Alison Durand, Lavanya Thana, Mustafa Al-Haboubi, Agata Pacho, Lucia Rehackova, Gerald Wistow, Nick Douglas, Nicholas Mays","doi":"10.1177/13558196251349400","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> Community-based multi-disciplinary teams (MDTs) were among the most widely reported health and care integration initiatives in the Integrated Care Pioneers in England. Such MDTs bring together staff from different sectors to co-ordinate and plan care for patients, who are often older, have multiple long-term conditions and risk hospital admission. As part of our evaluation of MDTs in two contrasting Pioneers, we explored MDT patients' and informal carers' perspectives on health and care services. As the COVID-19 pandemic started during data collection, we also wanted to understand its impact on patients' access to services. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted qualitative interviews with 44 patients aged 60 or over, with long-term conditions, and on the caseload of one of 11 participating MDTs. We also undertook qualitative interviews with 15 carers. Interviews took place between November 2019 and March 2021. Interview transcripts were coded in NVivo-12 and analysed thematically. <b>Results:</b> In addition to formal services, patients often relied on informal care. Valued aspects of care included equipment and home modifications that supported independence, timely access to and continuity in care, effective information-sharing, professionals who made them feel that their needs mattered, and having a named contact. Where challenges were experienced (e.g. with accessing professionals, communication, and care quality), patients and carers sometimes felt abandoned. While some patients mentioned being on an MDT caseload, few reported having a care plan. The impacts of caring on informal carers were sometimes considerable. COVID-19 affected patient and carer wellbeing, but the new ways of accessing care generated by the pandemic were valued by some participants. <b>Conclusions:</b> As long as challenges remain, patients and carers are unlikely to perceive care as joined-up and patient-centred. If truly integrated and holistic care is to be provided, barriers (such as the lack of shared patient records) must be addressed. Even where MDTs function primarily to co-ordinate rather than deliver care, they could better communicate their co-ordinating role, and MDT discussion outcomes, including care decisions, to patients. Informal carers' needs also require greater attention by MDTs.</p>","PeriodicalId":15953,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Services Research & Policy","volume":"30 1_suppl","pages":"48S-57S"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12423458/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Services Research & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13558196251349400","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Community-based multi-disciplinary teams (MDTs) were among the most widely reported health and care integration initiatives in the Integrated Care Pioneers in England. Such MDTs bring together staff from different sectors to co-ordinate and plan care for patients, who are often older, have multiple long-term conditions and risk hospital admission. As part of our evaluation of MDTs in two contrasting Pioneers, we explored MDT patients' and informal carers' perspectives on health and care services. As the COVID-19 pandemic started during data collection, we also wanted to understand its impact on patients' access to services. Methods: We conducted qualitative interviews with 44 patients aged 60 or over, with long-term conditions, and on the caseload of one of 11 participating MDTs. We also undertook qualitative interviews with 15 carers. Interviews took place between November 2019 and March 2021. Interview transcripts were coded in NVivo-12 and analysed thematically. Results: In addition to formal services, patients often relied on informal care. Valued aspects of care included equipment and home modifications that supported independence, timely access to and continuity in care, effective information-sharing, professionals who made them feel that their needs mattered, and having a named contact. Where challenges were experienced (e.g. with accessing professionals, communication, and care quality), patients and carers sometimes felt abandoned. While some patients mentioned being on an MDT caseload, few reported having a care plan. The impacts of caring on informal carers were sometimes considerable. COVID-19 affected patient and carer wellbeing, but the new ways of accessing care generated by the pandemic were valued by some participants. Conclusions: As long as challenges remain, patients and carers are unlikely to perceive care as joined-up and patient-centred. If truly integrated and holistic care is to be provided, barriers (such as the lack of shared patient records) must be addressed. Even where MDTs function primarily to co-ordinate rather than deliver care, they could better communicate their co-ordinating role, and MDT discussion outcomes, including care decisions, to patients. Informal carers' needs also require greater attention by MDTs.

老年人对基于社区的多学科小组病例量和非正式护理人员对英格兰两个综合护理先锋站点的保健和护理服务的看法。
目标:以社区为基础的多学科团队(MDTs)是英国综合护理先驱中报告最广泛的保健和护理整合举措之一。这种mdt将来自不同部门的工作人员聚集在一起,协调和规划对患者的护理,这些患者往往年龄较大,患有多种长期疾病,并有住院的风险。作为我们在两个对比鲜明的先锋中对MDT进行评估的一部分,我们探讨了MDT患者和非正式护理人员对健康和护理服务的看法。由于COVID-19大流行在数据收集期间开始,我们还希望了解其对患者获得服务的影响。方法:我们对44名年龄在60岁或以上的长期患者进行了定性访谈,并对11名参与MDTs中的1名进行了病例量访谈。我们还对15名护理人员进行了定性访谈。采访于2019年11月至2021年3月期间进行。访谈记录在NVivo-12中编码,并按主题进行分析。结果:除正规服务外,患者往往依赖于非正规护理。护理的重要方面包括支持独立性的设备和家庭改造,及时获得和持续的护理,有效的信息共享,使他们感到他们的需求受到重视的专业人员,以及有一个指定的联系人。在遇到挑战的地方(例如在获得专业人员、沟通和护理质量方面),患者和护理人员有时会感到被抛弃。虽然一些患者提到正在接受联合化疗,但很少有人报告有护理计划。照顾对非正式照顾者的影响有时是相当大的。COVID-19影响了患者和护理人员的福祉,但一些与会者重视大流行带来的获得护理的新途径。结论:只要挑战仍然存在,患者和护理人员就不太可能将护理视为联合和以患者为中心的。如果要提供真正的综合和全面的护理,就必须解决障碍(例如缺乏共享的患者记录)。即使在MDT主要是协调而不是提供护理的地方,他们也可以更好地向患者传达他们的协调作用,以及MDT讨论的结果,包括护理决定。非正式照护者的需求也需要mdt给予更多的关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: Journal of Health Services Research & Policy provides a unique opportunity to explore the ideas, policies and decisions shaping health services throughout the world. Edited and peer-reviewed by experts in the field and with a high academic standard and multidisciplinary approach, readers will gain a greater understanding of the current issues in healthcare policy and research. The journal"s strong international editorial advisory board also ensures that readers obtain a truly global and insightful perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信