Frontline staff perspectives on multi-disciplinary team working and the effectiveness of integrated service delivery: Findings from the evaluation of the Integrated Care and Support Pioneers in England.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Lavanya Thana, Gerald Wistow, Mary Alison Durand, Agata Pacho, Lucia Rehackova, Nick Douglas, Mustafa Al-Haboubi, Nicholas Mays
{"title":"Frontline staff perspectives on multi-disciplinary team working and the effectiveness of integrated service delivery: Findings from the evaluation of the Integrated Care and Support Pioneers in England.","authors":"Lavanya Thana, Gerald Wistow, Mary Alison Durand, Agata Pacho, Lucia Rehackova, Nick Douglas, Mustafa Al-Haboubi, Nicholas Mays","doi":"10.1177/13558196251349388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectivesHorizontal integration of health and social care in England is frequently supported by multi-disciplinary (MDT) case management focused on high-risk older people with multiple chronic conditions living in the community. This paper analyses MDT working in two of the 25 areas participating in the Integrated Care and Support Pioneer Programme in England. The analysis aims to understand the experience of frontline staff in such MDTs of working with professionals and staff from multiple sectors, and their perceptions of their roles and the benefits of integrated working.MethodsWe conducted semi-structured interviews with a purposive sample of 54 frontline staff from a range of professional backgrounds working in 11 community-based MDTs in two Integrated Care and Support Pioneers. A largely inductively developed coding frame was used to thematically code and guide analysis of verbatim interview transcripts from audio recordings.FindingsStaff conceptualised the team as a cohesive yet 'porous' entity, able to evolve a shared sense of purpose to deliver holistic care that helped to level traditional professional hierarchies, enable collective problem-solving and share responsibility for patient care. MDT working was seen as benefiting staff and patients. Despite strong similarities between the MDTs in members' understandings of the role and purpose of a MDT, each MDT was adapted to its context and the needs of the population served. The process of working through inter-professional tensions seemed to strengthen relationships within the team and enhance its ability to work effectively in the local health and care system. However, without performance or outcome measures, these perceptions were driven by 'soft' intelligence alone.ConclusionsFrontline staff accounts of MDT working demonstrate their strong commitment to this way of working, as a mechanism enabling them to deliver more holistic care with perceived benefits to patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":15953,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Services Research & Policy","volume":"30 1_suppl","pages":"36S-47S"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12423457/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Services Research & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13558196251349388","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectivesHorizontal integration of health and social care in England is frequently supported by multi-disciplinary (MDT) case management focused on high-risk older people with multiple chronic conditions living in the community. This paper analyses MDT working in two of the 25 areas participating in the Integrated Care and Support Pioneer Programme in England. The analysis aims to understand the experience of frontline staff in such MDTs of working with professionals and staff from multiple sectors, and their perceptions of their roles and the benefits of integrated working.MethodsWe conducted semi-structured interviews with a purposive sample of 54 frontline staff from a range of professional backgrounds working in 11 community-based MDTs in two Integrated Care and Support Pioneers. A largely inductively developed coding frame was used to thematically code and guide analysis of verbatim interview transcripts from audio recordings.FindingsStaff conceptualised the team as a cohesive yet 'porous' entity, able to evolve a shared sense of purpose to deliver holistic care that helped to level traditional professional hierarchies, enable collective problem-solving and share responsibility for patient care. MDT working was seen as benefiting staff and patients. Despite strong similarities between the MDTs in members' understandings of the role and purpose of a MDT, each MDT was adapted to its context and the needs of the population served. The process of working through inter-professional tensions seemed to strengthen relationships within the team and enhance its ability to work effectively in the local health and care system. However, without performance or outcome measures, these perceptions were driven by 'soft' intelligence alone.ConclusionsFrontline staff accounts of MDT working demonstrate their strong commitment to this way of working, as a mechanism enabling them to deliver more holistic care with perceived benefits to patients.

Abstract Image

一线员工对多学科团队工作和综合服务提供有效性的看法:来自英国综合护理和支持先驱评估的结果。
在英格兰,健康和社会护理的横向整合经常得到多学科(MDT)病例管理的支持,重点关注生活在社区中患有多种慢性疾病的高风险老年人。本文分析了MDT在英国参与综合护理和支持先锋计划的25个领域中的两个领域的工作。分析的目的是了解前线员工在这类MDTs中与专业人士和来自多个部门的员工合作的经验,以及他们对自己的角色和综合工作的好处的看法。方法我们对54名一线工作人员进行了半结构化访谈,这些工作人员来自两家综合护理和支持先锋医院的11个社区mdt,具有不同的专业背景。一个很大程度上归纳开发的编码框架被用于主题编码和指导分析逐字采访录音。工作人员将团队概念化为一个有凝聚力但“多孔”的实体,能够形成一种共同的目标感,提供整体护理,帮助消除传统的专业等级制度,实现集体解决问题并分担病人护理的责任。MDT工作被视为对工作人员和患者有益。尽管各MDT成员对MDT的作用和目的的理解非常相似,但每个MDT都根据其背景和服务对象的需要进行了调整。解决专业间紧张关系的工作过程似乎加强了团队内部的关系,并提高了其在当地卫生和保健系统中有效工作的能力。然而,在没有表现或结果衡量的情况下,这些看法仅仅是由“软”智力驱动的。结论:一线员工对MDT工作的描述表明他们对这种工作方式的坚定承诺,作为一种机制,使他们能够提供更全面的护理,并为患者带来明显的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: Journal of Health Services Research & Policy provides a unique opportunity to explore the ideas, policies and decisions shaping health services throughout the world. Edited and peer-reviewed by experts in the field and with a high academic standard and multidisciplinary approach, readers will gain a greater understanding of the current issues in healthcare policy and research. The journal"s strong international editorial advisory board also ensures that readers obtain a truly global and insightful perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信