R-DA-EPOCH Versus DA-EPOCH-R: Impact of Chemoimmunotherapy Sequencing on Treatment Outcomes in Patients With Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Benjamin J Lee, Shawn P Griffin, Jean Doh, Anthony Quach, Yujiao Sun, Elizabeth A Brem, Richard A Van Etten, Edward L Nelson, Catherine C Coombs, Alexandre Chan
{"title":"R-DA-EPOCH Versus DA-EPOCH-R: Impact of Chemoimmunotherapy Sequencing on Treatment Outcomes in Patients With Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.","authors":"Benjamin J Lee, Shawn P Griffin, Jean Doh, Anthony Quach, Yujiao Sun, Elizabeth A Brem, Richard A Van Etten, Edward L Nelson, Catherine C Coombs, Alexandre Chan","doi":"10.1016/j.clml.2025.06.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chemoimmunotherapy with rituximab (R) added to dose-adjusted (DA)-EPOCH (continuous infusion of etoposide, vincristine, and doxorubicin with cyclophosphamide and prednisone) has become a standard treatment approach for high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients. In contrast to pivotal trials that sequenced rituximab with the initiation of each chemoimmunotherapy cycle, our institution adopted delaying rituximab following discharge after EPOCH completion in patients requiring inpatient chemotherapy (DA-EPOCH-R). Herein, we evaluate the efficacy and safety of rituximab sequencing with EPOCH initiation and after EPOCH administration.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review of all DLBCL patients who received first-line treatment with R-DA-EPOCH or DA-EPOCH-R between 2016 and 2023 was conducted. Outcomes of interest included progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), complete response (CR), overall survival (OS), and cumulative incidence of relapse.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 31 DA-EPOCH-R and 35 R-DA-EPOCH patients were included. PFS at 4-years was not significantly different between DA-EPOCH-R and R-DA-EPOCH treated patients (75.2% vs. 77.9%; HR 1.10; 95% CI, 0.38-3.13; P = .86). ORR (93.5% vs. 100%; P = .22) and CR (90.3% vs. 85.7%; P = .71) were also similar between cohorts. Rituximab-related infusion reactions were higher among R-DA-EPOCH-treated patients with cycle 1 (P = .038).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest delaying rituximab following EPOCH did not affect treatment outcomes and are associated with lower infusion reactions.</p>","PeriodicalId":10348,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clml.2025.06.018","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Chemoimmunotherapy with rituximab (R) added to dose-adjusted (DA)-EPOCH (continuous infusion of etoposide, vincristine, and doxorubicin with cyclophosphamide and prednisone) has become a standard treatment approach for high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients. In contrast to pivotal trials that sequenced rituximab with the initiation of each chemoimmunotherapy cycle, our institution adopted delaying rituximab following discharge after EPOCH completion in patients requiring inpatient chemotherapy (DA-EPOCH-R). Herein, we evaluate the efficacy and safety of rituximab sequencing with EPOCH initiation and after EPOCH administration.

Patients and methods: A retrospective chart review of all DLBCL patients who received first-line treatment with R-DA-EPOCH or DA-EPOCH-R between 2016 and 2023 was conducted. Outcomes of interest included progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), complete response (CR), overall survival (OS), and cumulative incidence of relapse.

Results: A total of 31 DA-EPOCH-R and 35 R-DA-EPOCH patients were included. PFS at 4-years was not significantly different between DA-EPOCH-R and R-DA-EPOCH treated patients (75.2% vs. 77.9%; HR 1.10; 95% CI, 0.38-3.13; P = .86). ORR (93.5% vs. 100%; P = .22) and CR (90.3% vs. 85.7%; P = .71) were also similar between cohorts. Rituximab-related infusion reactions were higher among R-DA-EPOCH-treated patients with cycle 1 (P = .038).

Conclusion: Our findings suggest delaying rituximab following EPOCH did not affect treatment outcomes and are associated with lower infusion reactions.

R-DA-EPOCH与DA-EPOCH-R:化疗免疫治疗排序对弥漫性大b细胞淋巴瘤患者治疗结果的影响
背景:利妥昔单抗(R)加入剂量调整(DA)-EPOCH(持续输注依托泊苷、长春新碱、阿霉素与环磷酰胺和泼尼松)的化学免疫治疗已成为高风险弥漫性大b细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)患者的标准治疗方法。与在每个化疗免疫治疗周期开始时对利妥昔单抗进行测序的关键试验相反,我们的机构在需要住院化疗的患者完成EPOCH后出院后延迟使用利妥昔单抗(DA-EPOCH-R)。在此,我们评估了利妥昔单抗在EPOCH启动和EPOCH给药后的有效性和安全性。患者和方法:对2016年至2023年间接受R-DA-EPOCH或DA-EPOCH-R一线治疗的所有DLBCL患者进行回顾性图表分析。研究结果包括无进展生存期(PFS)、总缓解率(ORR)、完全缓解期(CR)、总生存期(OS)和累积复发率。结果:共纳入31例DA-EPOCH-R和35例R-DA-EPOCH患者。DA-EPOCH-R和R-DA-EPOCH治疗的患者4年PFS无显著差异(75.2% vs 77.9%;人力资源1.10;95% ci, 0.38-3.13;P = .86)。ORR (93.5% vs. 100%;P = 0.22)和CR (90.3% vs. 85.7%;P = .71)之间也相似。在r - da - epoch治疗的患者中,利妥昔单抗相关输注反应较高(P = 0.038)。结论:我们的研究结果表明,EPOCH后延迟使用利妥昔单抗并不影响治疗结果,并且与较低的输液反应相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
1606
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia is a peer-reviewed monthly journal that publishes original articles describing various aspects of clinical and translational research of lymphoma, myeloma and leukemia. Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of lymphoma, myeloma, leukemia and related disorders including macroglobulinemia, amyloidosis, and plasma-cell dyscrasias. The main emphasis is on recent scientific developments in all areas related to lymphoma, myeloma and leukemia. Specific areas of interest include clinical research and mechanistic approaches; drug sensitivity and resistance; gene and antisense therapy; pathology, markers, and prognostic indicators; chemoprevention strategies; multimodality therapy; and integration of various approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信