Suzan Khalil, William Hicks, Floyd W Burke, Ishak A Mansi
{"title":"Association of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist with Incident Atrial Fibrillation.","authors":"Suzan Khalil, William Hicks, Floyd W Burke, Ishak A Mansi","doi":"10.1007/s40256-025-00751-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) have shown efficacy in reducing cardiovascular events in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM), but conflicting evidence exists regarding their impact on cardiac arrhythmias. Whereas some studies associated GLP-1RAs with arrhythmogenesis, other studies suggested a decreased association with atrial fibrillation (AF).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim was to compare the risk of incident AF after initiation of GLP-1RAs versus dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4is), as active comparators, in patients with DM.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study was conducted.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The national data of Veterans Health Administration during fiscal years 2006-2021 were used for the study.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Adults who initiated either GLP-1RA or DPP4i medications were included.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>The primary outcome was a composite outcome of AF (diagnosis of AF/flutter or undergoing an AF procedure).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 116,235 GLP-1RA users and 217,668 DPP4i users, we propensity score-matched 80,948 pairs, on 88 characteristics. The composite outcome of AF was similar in the GLP-1RA group (4.1%) and DPP4i group (4.3%); odds ratio (OR) 0.96, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.92-1.01. Secondary analyses stratified by medication use duration showed no significant differences in composite AF risk (p > 0.05). Individuals achieving 5% weight loss from baseline body weight had significantly lower AF incidence (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.78-0.89), whereas no significant differences were observed in those with no weight loss or weight gain (OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.97-1.12).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>GLP-1RA use was not associated with a decreased or increased risk of AF compared to DPP4i use. In subgroup analysis, lower AF risk was seen in GLP-1RA versus DPP4i users who achieved weight loss, which suggests weight loss as a potential modifier of response to GLP-1RAs.</p>","PeriodicalId":7652,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40256-025-00751-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) have shown efficacy in reducing cardiovascular events in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM), but conflicting evidence exists regarding their impact on cardiac arrhythmias. Whereas some studies associated GLP-1RAs with arrhythmogenesis, other studies suggested a decreased association with atrial fibrillation (AF).
Objective: The aim was to compare the risk of incident AF after initiation of GLP-1RAs versus dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4is), as active comparators, in patients with DM.
Design: A retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study was conducted.
Setting: The national data of Veterans Health Administration during fiscal years 2006-2021 were used for the study.
Patients: Adults who initiated either GLP-1RA or DPP4i medications were included.
Measurements: The primary outcome was a composite outcome of AF (diagnosis of AF/flutter or undergoing an AF procedure).
Results: Out of 116,235 GLP-1RA users and 217,668 DPP4i users, we propensity score-matched 80,948 pairs, on 88 characteristics. The composite outcome of AF was similar in the GLP-1RA group (4.1%) and DPP4i group (4.3%); odds ratio (OR) 0.96, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.92-1.01. Secondary analyses stratified by medication use duration showed no significant differences in composite AF risk (p > 0.05). Individuals achieving 5% weight loss from baseline body weight had significantly lower AF incidence (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.78-0.89), whereas no significant differences were observed in those with no weight loss or weight gain (OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.97-1.12).
Conclusions: GLP-1RA use was not associated with a decreased or increased risk of AF compared to DPP4i use. In subgroup analysis, lower AF risk was seen in GLP-1RA versus DPP4i users who achieved weight loss, which suggests weight loss as a potential modifier of response to GLP-1RAs.
期刊介绍:
Promoting rational therapy within the discipline of cardiology, the American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs covers all aspects of the treatment of cardiovascular disorders, particularly the place in therapy of newer and established agents.
Via a program of reviews and original clinical research articles, the journal addresses major issues relating to treatment of these disorders, including the pharmacology, efficacy and adverse effects of the major classes of drugs; information on newly developed drugs and drug classes; the therapeutic implications of latest research into the aetiology of cardiovascular disorders; and the practical management of specific clinical situations.
The American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs offers a range of additional enhanced features designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. Each article is accompanied by a Key Points summary, giving a time-efficient overview of the content to a wide readership. Articles may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist patients, caregivers and others in understanding important medical advances. The journal also provides the option to include various other types of enhanced features including slide sets, videos and animations. All enhanced features are peer reviewed to the same high standard as the article itself. Peer review is conducted using Editorial Manager®, supported by a database of international experts. This database is shared with other Adis journals.