Association of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist with Incident Atrial Fibrillation.

IF 3 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Suzan Khalil, William Hicks, Floyd W Burke, Ishak A Mansi
{"title":"Association of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist with Incident Atrial Fibrillation.","authors":"Suzan Khalil, William Hicks, Floyd W Burke, Ishak A Mansi","doi":"10.1007/s40256-025-00751-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) have shown efficacy in reducing cardiovascular events in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM), but conflicting evidence exists regarding their impact on cardiac arrhythmias. Whereas some studies associated GLP-1RAs with arrhythmogenesis, other studies suggested a decreased association with atrial fibrillation (AF).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim was to compare the risk of incident AF after initiation of GLP-1RAs versus dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4is), as active comparators, in patients with DM.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study was conducted.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The national data of Veterans Health Administration during fiscal years 2006-2021 were used for the study.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Adults who initiated either GLP-1RA or DPP4i medications were included.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>The primary outcome was a composite outcome of AF (diagnosis of AF/flutter or undergoing an AF procedure).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 116,235 GLP-1RA users and 217,668 DPP4i users, we propensity score-matched 80,948 pairs, on 88 characteristics. The composite outcome of AF was similar in the GLP-1RA group (4.1%) and DPP4i group (4.3%); odds ratio (OR) 0.96, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.92-1.01. Secondary analyses stratified by medication use duration showed no significant differences in composite AF risk (p > 0.05). Individuals achieving 5% weight loss from baseline body weight had significantly lower AF incidence (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.78-0.89), whereas no significant differences were observed in those with no weight loss or weight gain (OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.97-1.12).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>GLP-1RA use was not associated with a decreased or increased risk of AF compared to DPP4i use. In subgroup analysis, lower AF risk was seen in GLP-1RA versus DPP4i users who achieved weight loss, which suggests weight loss as a potential modifier of response to GLP-1RAs.</p>","PeriodicalId":7652,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40256-025-00751-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) have shown efficacy in reducing cardiovascular events in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM), but conflicting evidence exists regarding their impact on cardiac arrhythmias. Whereas some studies associated GLP-1RAs with arrhythmogenesis, other studies suggested a decreased association with atrial fibrillation (AF).

Objective: The aim was to compare the risk of incident AF after initiation of GLP-1RAs versus dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4is), as active comparators, in patients with DM.

Design: A retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study was conducted.

Setting: The national data of Veterans Health Administration during fiscal years 2006-2021 were used for the study.

Patients: Adults who initiated either GLP-1RA or DPP4i medications were included.

Measurements: The primary outcome was a composite outcome of AF (diagnosis of AF/flutter or undergoing an AF procedure).

Results: Out of 116,235 GLP-1RA users and 217,668 DPP4i users, we propensity score-matched 80,948 pairs, on 88 characteristics. The composite outcome of AF was similar in the GLP-1RA group (4.1%) and DPP4i group (4.3%); odds ratio (OR) 0.96, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.92-1.01. Secondary analyses stratified by medication use duration showed no significant differences in composite AF risk (p > 0.05). Individuals achieving 5% weight loss from baseline body weight had significantly lower AF incidence (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.78-0.89), whereas no significant differences were observed in those with no weight loss or weight gain (OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.97-1.12).

Conclusions: GLP-1RA use was not associated with a decreased or increased risk of AF compared to DPP4i use. In subgroup analysis, lower AF risk was seen in GLP-1RA versus DPP4i users who achieved weight loss, which suggests weight loss as a potential modifier of response to GLP-1RAs.

胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂与房颤发生的关系。
背景:胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1RAs)已显示出减少糖尿病(DM)患者心血管事件的疗效,但关于其对心律失常的影响存在相互矛盾的证据。尽管一些研究将GLP-1RAs与心律失常联系起来,但其他研究表明其与房颤(AF)的相关性降低。目的:目的是比较GLP-1RAs与二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂(DPP4is)作为活性比较物在dm患者中发生房颤的风险。设计:进行回顾性倾向评分匹配队列研究。背景:研究使用2006-2021财政年度退伍军人健康管理局的全国数据。患者:开始GLP-1RA或DPP4i药物治疗的成人包括在内。测量:主要终点是房颤的综合终点(房颤/扑动诊断或房颤手术)。结果:在116,235名GLP-1RA用户和217,668名DPP4i用户中,我们在88个特征上匹配了80,948对倾向得分。GLP-1RA组与DPP4i组房颤综合结局相似(4.1%);优势比(OR) 0.96, 95%可信区间(CI) 0.92-1.01。按用药时间分层的二次分析显示,复合房颤风险差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。体重较基线体重减轻5%的个体AF发病率显著降低(OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.78-0.89),而体重未减轻或未增加的个体AF发病率无显著差异(OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.97-1.12)。结论:与使用DPP4i相比,GLP-1RA的使用与AF风险的降低或增加无关。在亚组分析中,与体重减轻的DPP4i使用者相比,GLP-1RA的AF风险较低,这表明体重减轻是GLP-1RAs反应的潜在调节因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
38
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Promoting rational therapy within the discipline of cardiology, the American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs covers all aspects of the treatment of cardiovascular disorders, particularly the place in therapy of newer and established agents. Via a program of reviews and original clinical research articles, the journal addresses major issues relating to treatment of these disorders, including the pharmacology, efficacy and adverse effects of the major classes of drugs; information on newly developed drugs and drug classes; the therapeutic implications of latest research into the aetiology of cardiovascular disorders; and the practical management of specific clinical situations. The American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs offers a range of additional enhanced features designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. Each article is accompanied by a Key Points summary, giving a time-efficient overview of the content to a wide readership. Articles may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist patients, caregivers and others in understanding important medical advances. The journal also provides the option to include various other types of enhanced features including slide sets, videos and animations. All enhanced features are peer reviewed to the same high standard as the article itself. Peer review is conducted using Editorial Manager®, supported by a database of international experts. This database is shared with other Adis journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信