Victimhood as a Legitimation Strategy of Populism in Power: The Case of Poland

Agnieszka K. Cianciara
{"title":"Victimhood as a Legitimation Strategy of Populism in Power: The Case of Poland","authors":"Agnieszka K. Cianciara","doi":"10.1002/cep4.70017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>What legitimation strategy do populists use once they seize power? This article combines insights from literatures on populism in power, populist legitimation strategies, populist foreign policy and populist usages of memory politics to shed light on victimhood as a powerful legitimation strategy of populism in power. The main objective of this study is to understand the role of victims versus perpetrators dynamics as a legitimating strategy of populists in power, while looking at the single case study of Poland under the right-wing populist government led by the Law and Justice party (2015–2023). The empirical analysis traces how populists in power engage in a double game of self-legitimation as both victims and heroes, as well as in a two-level game of de-legitimation of domestic and international actors as perpetrators. It highlights how victimhood-based narratives allow the underdog illusion to be sustained when populists gain power, while copy-pasting the victim-perpetrator relationship from the traumatic past into the present. Finally, the analysis shows how the de-legitimating narrative imposes a principal-agent relationship between foreign and domestic perpetrators.</p>","PeriodicalId":100329,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary European Politics","volume":"3 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cep4.70017","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary European Politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cep4.70017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

What legitimation strategy do populists use once they seize power? This article combines insights from literatures on populism in power, populist legitimation strategies, populist foreign policy and populist usages of memory politics to shed light on victimhood as a powerful legitimation strategy of populism in power. The main objective of this study is to understand the role of victims versus perpetrators dynamics as a legitimating strategy of populists in power, while looking at the single case study of Poland under the right-wing populist government led by the Law and Justice party (2015–2023). The empirical analysis traces how populists in power engage in a double game of self-legitimation as both victims and heroes, as well as in a two-level game of de-legitimation of domestic and international actors as perpetrators. It highlights how victimhood-based narratives allow the underdog illusion to be sustained when populists gain power, while copy-pasting the victim-perpetrator relationship from the traumatic past into the present. Finally, the analysis shows how the de-legitimating narrative imposes a principal-agent relationship between foreign and domestic perpetrators.

受害作为民粹主义执政的一种正当化策略:以波兰为例
民粹主义者一旦掌权,他们会使用什么样的合法化策略?本文结合民粹主义执政、民粹主义合法化策略、民粹主义外交政策和记忆政治的民粹主义运用等方面的文献见解,揭示了受害者身份作为民粹主义执政的有力合法化策略。本研究的主要目的是了解作为民粹主义者执政的合法策略的受害者与肇事者动态的作用,同时研究由法律与正义党领导的右翼民粹主义政府(2015-2023)下的波兰的单一案例研究。实证分析追踪了当权的民粹主义者是如何参与一场双重游戏的,既作为受害者又作为英雄自我合法化,以及在一场两级游戏中,将国内和国际行动者作为肇事者去合法化。它强调了当民粹主义者获得权力时,基于受害者的叙事如何让弱者的错觉得以维持,同时将受害者与加害者的关系从创伤的过去复制粘贴到现在。最后,分析显示了非合法化叙事如何在外国和国内犯罪者之间强加一种委托代理关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信