Best practices for mitigating seabird bycatch on Taiwanese albacore longline fishing vessels operating in the southeastern Atlantic Ocean

IF 3.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Hsiang-Wen Huang , Huan-Chang Liao , Ting-Chun Kuo , Shu-Chun Chen , Yu-Min Yeh
{"title":"Best practices for mitigating seabird bycatch on Taiwanese albacore longline fishing vessels operating in the southeastern Atlantic Ocean","authors":"Hsiang-Wen Huang ,&nbsp;Huan-Chang Liao ,&nbsp;Ting-Chun Kuo ,&nbsp;Shu-Chun Chen ,&nbsp;Yu-Min Yeh","doi":"10.1016/j.gecco.2025.e03752","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Seabird bycatch—particularly involving albatrosses and petrels—remains a significant conservation concern in pelagic longline fisheries. This study evaluated the effectiveness of three mitigation measures—bird-scaring lines (BSLs), weighted branch lines, and night setting—in reducing seabird bycatch in the Taiwanese albacore (Thunnus alalunga) longline fishery operating in the southeastern Atlantic Ocean. Observations were conducted aboard a commercial vessel during 103 longline sets in 2013. Four BSL treatments were tested: single and double conventional BSLs and single and double experimental BSLs recommended by the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT), each combined with either weighted (60 g at 3 m from the hook) or unweighted branch lines. A total of 298 seabirds were caught during line setting, with an additional 18 birds caught and released alive during hauling and trolling. Night setting emerged as the most effective mitigation measure, with a bycatch rate of 0.046 birds per 1000 hooks—substantially lower than the 1.101 birds per 1000 hooks recorded during daytime setting. While BSLs effectively deterred seabird attacks within their aerial extent, their efficacy declined when baited hooks remained within the diving range of seabirds beyond this zone. Weighted branch lines reduced seabird bycatch by 61 %; however, they were also associated with a potential decrease in albacore catch rates. Our findings highlight that the effectiveness of best practice mitigation—namely, the combined use of BSLs and weighted branch lines—depends on ensuring that baited hooks reach depths beyond seabird diving capabilities before exiting the aerial extent of the BSLs. Further optimization is needed to balance conservation outcomes with fishery performance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54264,"journal":{"name":"Global Ecology and Conservation","volume":"62 ","pages":"Article e03752"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Ecology and Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989425003531","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Seabird bycatch—particularly involving albatrosses and petrels—remains a significant conservation concern in pelagic longline fisheries. This study evaluated the effectiveness of three mitigation measures—bird-scaring lines (BSLs), weighted branch lines, and night setting—in reducing seabird bycatch in the Taiwanese albacore (Thunnus alalunga) longline fishery operating in the southeastern Atlantic Ocean. Observations were conducted aboard a commercial vessel during 103 longline sets in 2013. Four BSL treatments were tested: single and double conventional BSLs and single and double experimental BSLs recommended by the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT), each combined with either weighted (60 g at 3 m from the hook) or unweighted branch lines. A total of 298 seabirds were caught during line setting, with an additional 18 birds caught and released alive during hauling and trolling. Night setting emerged as the most effective mitigation measure, with a bycatch rate of 0.046 birds per 1000 hooks—substantially lower than the 1.101 birds per 1000 hooks recorded during daytime setting. While BSLs effectively deterred seabird attacks within their aerial extent, their efficacy declined when baited hooks remained within the diving range of seabirds beyond this zone. Weighted branch lines reduced seabird bycatch by 61 %; however, they were also associated with a potential decrease in albacore catch rates. Our findings highlight that the effectiveness of best practice mitigation—namely, the combined use of BSLs and weighted branch lines—depends on ensuring that baited hooks reach depths beyond seabird diving capabilities before exiting the aerial extent of the BSLs. Further optimization is needed to balance conservation outcomes with fishery performance.
减少在东南大西洋作业的台湾长鳍金枪鱼延绳钓渔船附带捕获海鸟的最佳做法
海鸟兼捕——特别是信天翁和海燕——在远洋延绳钓渔业中仍然是一个重要的保护问题。摘要本研究以大西洋东南部台湾长鳍金枪鱼(Thunnus alalunga)延绳钓为研究对象,评估了三种缓解措施(捕鸟线、加权支线和夜间放养)对减少副捕海鸟的效果。2013年,在一艘商船上进行了103次延绳钓观测。测试了四种BSL处理:单一和双重传统BSL以及国际大西洋金枪鱼保护委员会(ICCAT)推荐的单一和双重实验BSL,每种BSL都与加权(距钩3 m处60 g)或未加权分支线结合。在放线过程中,共捕获了298只海鸟,在拖网和拖钓过程中,另外捕获了18只海鸟并将其活着释放。夜间放养是最有效的缓解措施,副渔获率为每1000钩0.046只鸟,大大低于白天放养的每1000钩1.101只鸟。虽然鱼钩在其空中范围内有效地阻止了海鸟的攻击,但当鱼钩停留在该区域以外的海鸟潜水范围内时,其效果就会下降。加权支线减少了61 %的海鸟副渔获量;然而,它们也与长鳍金枪鱼捕捞率的潜在下降有关。我们的研究结果强调,最佳实践缓解的有效性——即,BSLs和加权分支线的联合使用——取决于确保在离开BSLs的空中范围之前,带饵的钩子达到超过海鸟潜水能力的深度。需要进一步优化,以平衡保护成果与渔业绩效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Ecology and Conservation
Global Ecology and Conservation Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
346
审稿时长
83 days
期刊介绍: Global Ecology and Conservation is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal covering all sub-disciplines of ecological and conservation science: from theory to practice, from molecules to ecosystems, from regional to global. The fields covered include: organismal, population, community, and ecosystem ecology; physiological, evolutionary, and behavioral ecology; and conservation science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信