Creating a Community of Safety in Black Maternal Health Research.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Alexis Dunn Amore, Abby J Britt, Renee Byfield, Kareena Cumberbatch, Oluwatomisin Faith-Tomi Wilson, Kamisha Milton, Raquibah Raheem, Shelley Gutierrez, Tietra Jones, Amanda Mullen, Nicole S Carlson
{"title":"Creating a Community of Safety in Black Maternal Health Research.","authors":"Alexis Dunn Amore, Abby J Britt, Renee Byfield, Kareena Cumberbatch, Oluwatomisin Faith-Tomi Wilson, Kamisha Milton, Raquibah Raheem, Shelley Gutierrez, Tietra Jones, Amanda Mullen, Nicole S Carlson","doi":"10.1097/NNR.0000000000000849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Health disparities in maternal health outcomes persist among Black birthing populations in the United States. Given the historical harms experienced by Black populations in research, culturally tailored approaches to ensure ethical research are needed. Community-engaged research strategies have been found to be effective in a variety of investigations; however, little has been documented regarding their use within biologically focused research among pregnant populations.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this paper is to describe the process of engaging with a community advisory board of a biologically focused research study focused on reducing perinatal health disparities and promoting health equity. Specifically, we outline the methods followed to meaningfully involve the community in each step of the research process.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The research team utilized intentional team-building activities and feedback methods to relay information between the community and research partners regarding study protocols and community-led dissemination strategies. Online sessions with community partners were created utilizing community-engaged research principles to guide the sessions. Information obtained from the community advisory board (CAB) during these sessions was used to modify and optimize this study's data collection protocol, recruitment strategies, and dissemination efforts. A quantitative and qualitative survey was conducted during the process to gather feedback from CAB members about their experiences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CAB (n = 8 community members) shared in the operation of the project and collaborated on everything from study onset, recruitment/retention strategies, informed consent processes, and dissemination to data sharing. Scores from the quantitative questionnaire (n = 5) about their experiences demonstrated that members overall reported good or excellent experiences as participants in the CAB. Additionally, feedback from community members about how they felt working within a research team included feeling that they were (a) making the research study better, (b) learning about research, (c) providing voice for the community, and (d) building a community of trust. Detailed feedback on each session resulted in changes in study protocols, recruitment practices, and dissemination activities.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Safety is a crucial tenant of all research investigations. When research focuses on populations who have experienced perpetual harm, utilization of community expertise is necessary to ensure just and equitable research experiences.</p>","PeriodicalId":49723,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NNR.0000000000000849","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Health disparities in maternal health outcomes persist among Black birthing populations in the United States. Given the historical harms experienced by Black populations in research, culturally tailored approaches to ensure ethical research are needed. Community-engaged research strategies have been found to be effective in a variety of investigations; however, little has been documented regarding their use within biologically focused research among pregnant populations.

Objective: The purpose of this paper is to describe the process of engaging with a community advisory board of a biologically focused research study focused on reducing perinatal health disparities and promoting health equity. Specifically, we outline the methods followed to meaningfully involve the community in each step of the research process.

Methods: The research team utilized intentional team-building activities and feedback methods to relay information between the community and research partners regarding study protocols and community-led dissemination strategies. Online sessions with community partners were created utilizing community-engaged research principles to guide the sessions. Information obtained from the community advisory board (CAB) during these sessions was used to modify and optimize this study's data collection protocol, recruitment strategies, and dissemination efforts. A quantitative and qualitative survey was conducted during the process to gather feedback from CAB members about their experiences.

Results: The CAB (n = 8 community members) shared in the operation of the project and collaborated on everything from study onset, recruitment/retention strategies, informed consent processes, and dissemination to data sharing. Scores from the quantitative questionnaire (n = 5) about their experiences demonstrated that members overall reported good or excellent experiences as participants in the CAB. Additionally, feedback from community members about how they felt working within a research team included feeling that they were (a) making the research study better, (b) learning about research, (c) providing voice for the community, and (d) building a community of trust. Detailed feedback on each session resulted in changes in study protocols, recruitment practices, and dissemination activities.

Discussion: Safety is a crucial tenant of all research investigations. When research focuses on populations who have experienced perpetual harm, utilization of community expertise is necessary to ensure just and equitable research experiences.

在黑人孕产妇健康研究中创建一个安全社区。
背景:在美国黑人生育人群中,孕产妇健康结果的健康差异持续存在。考虑到黑人在研究中所经历的历史伤害,我们需要根据文化量身定制的方法来确保伦理研究。社区参与的研究策略在各种调查中被发现是有效的;然而,很少有关于在怀孕人群中以生物学为重点的研究中使用它们的记录。目的:本文的目的是描述与社区咨询委员会参与一项以生物学为重点的研究的过程,该研究的重点是减少围产期健康差距和促进健康公平。具体来说,我们概述了在研究过程的每个步骤中有意义地让社区参与的方法。方法:研究团队利用有意的团队建设活动和反馈方法,在社区和研究合作伙伴之间传递有关研究方案和社区主导的传播策略的信息。利用社区参与的研究原则来指导与社区合作伙伴的在线会议。在这些会议期间,从社区咨询委员会(CAB)获得的信息用于修改和优化本研究的数据收集方案、招募策略和传播工作。在此过程中,我们进行了定量和定性调查,以收集谘询委员会成员关于他们的经验的反馈。结果:CAB (n = 8名社区成员)参与了项目的运作,并在从研究开始、招募/保留策略、知情同意流程、传播到数据共享的所有方面进行了合作。关于他们的经历的定量问卷(n = 5)的得分表明,作为CAB的参与者,成员总体上报告了良好或优秀的经历。此外,社区成员关于他们在研究团队中工作的感受的反馈包括感觉他们(a)使研究研究更好,(b)学习研究,(c)为社区提供声音,以及(d)建立信任社区。每次会议的详细反馈导致了研究方案、招募实践和传播活动的变化。讨论:安全是所有研究调查的关键因素。当研究的重点是遭受永久伤害的人群时,利用社区专业知识是必要的,以确保公正和公平的研究经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nursing Research
Nursing Research 医学-护理
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
102
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Research is a peer-reviewed journal celebrating over 60 years as the most sought-after nursing resource; it offers more depth, more detail, and more of what today''s nurses demand. Nursing Research covers key issues, including health promotion, human responses to illness, acute care nursing research, symptom management, cost-effectiveness, vulnerable populations, health services, and community-based nursing studies. Each issue highlights the latest research techniques, quantitative and qualitative studies, and new state-of-the-art methodological strategies, including information not yet found in textbooks. Expert commentaries and briefs are also included. In addition to 6 issues per year, Nursing Research from time to time publishes supplemental content not found anywhere else.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信