The influence of recommendation algorithms on users' intention to adopt health information: does trust belief play a role?

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Yaling Luo, Zerui Zhao, Xiaojuan Xu, Yueyan Zhao, Feng Yang
{"title":"The influence of recommendation algorithms on users' intention to adopt health information: does trust belief play a role?","authors":"Yaling Luo, Zerui Zhao, Xiaojuan Xu, Yueyan Zhao, Feng Yang","doi":"10.1093/jamia/ocaf115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Recommendation systems have emerged as prevalent and effective tools. Investigating the impact of recommendation algorithms on users' health information adoption behavior can aid in optimizing health information services and advancing the construction and development of online health community platforms.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This study designed scenario experiments for social- and profile-oriented recommendations and collected data accordingly. The Theory of Knowledge-Based Trust was applied to explain users' trust beliefs in algorithmic recommendations. Nonparametric tests, logistic regression, and bootstrapping were used to test the variables' main, mediating, and moderating effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Social-oriented and profile-oriented recommendations were significantly correlated with users' intentions to adopt information. Competence belief (CB), benevolence belief (BB), and integrity belief (IB) mediated this relationship. Overall, the moderating effect of privacy concerns (PCs) is significant.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Both social- and profile-oriented recommendations can enhance users' willingness to adopt health information by facilitating their knowledge-based trust, with integrity beliefs playing a more substantial mediating role. Privacy concerns negatively moderate the impact of profile-oriented recommendations on benevolence and competence beliefs on information adoption intention.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study enriches the theoretical foundation of user health information adoption behavior in algorithmic recommendation contexts and provides new insights into the practice of health information on social media platforms.</p>","PeriodicalId":50016,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocaf115","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Recommendation systems have emerged as prevalent and effective tools. Investigating the impact of recommendation algorithms on users' health information adoption behavior can aid in optimizing health information services and advancing the construction and development of online health community platforms.

Materials and methods: This study designed scenario experiments for social- and profile-oriented recommendations and collected data accordingly. The Theory of Knowledge-Based Trust was applied to explain users' trust beliefs in algorithmic recommendations. Nonparametric tests, logistic regression, and bootstrapping were used to test the variables' main, mediating, and moderating effects.

Results: Social-oriented and profile-oriented recommendations were significantly correlated with users' intentions to adopt information. Competence belief (CB), benevolence belief (BB), and integrity belief (IB) mediated this relationship. Overall, the moderating effect of privacy concerns (PCs) is significant.

Discussion: Both social- and profile-oriented recommendations can enhance users' willingness to adopt health information by facilitating their knowledge-based trust, with integrity beliefs playing a more substantial mediating role. Privacy concerns negatively moderate the impact of profile-oriented recommendations on benevolence and competence beliefs on information adoption intention.

Conclusions: This study enriches the theoretical foundation of user health information adoption behavior in algorithmic recommendation contexts and provides new insights into the practice of health information on social media platforms.

推荐算法对用户健康信息采纳意愿的影响:信任信念是否起作用?
目标:推荐系统已经成为流行和有效的工具。研究推荐算法对用户健康信息采纳行为的影响,有助于优化健康信息服务,推进网络健康社区平台的建设与发展。材料与方法:本研究针对社交推荐和个人资料推荐设计情景实验,并收集数据。运用知识信任理论解释算法推荐中用户的信任信念。使用非参数检验、逻辑回归和自举来检验变量的主要、中介和调节效应。结果:面向社交和面向个人资料的推荐与用户接受信息的意愿显著相关。能力信念(CB)、仁爱信念(BB)和诚信信念(IB)在这一关系中起中介作用。总体而言,隐私问题(pc)的调节作用是显著的。讨论:以社交和个人资料为导向的推荐都可以通过促进用户基于知识的信任来增强用户接受健康信息的意愿,其中诚信信念发挥了更大的中介作用。隐私关注负向调节个人资料导向推荐对善心和能力信念对信息采纳意愿的影响。结论:本研究丰富了算法推荐情境下用户健康信息采纳行为的理论基础,为社交媒体平台健康信息的实践提供了新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 医学-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
7.80%
发文量
230
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JAMIA is AMIA''s premier peer-reviewed journal for biomedical and health informatics. Covering the full spectrum of activities in the field, JAMIA includes informatics articles in the areas of clinical care, clinical research, translational science, implementation science, imaging, education, consumer health, public health, and policy. JAMIA''s articles describe innovative informatics research and systems that help to advance biomedical science and to promote health. Case reports, perspectives and reviews also help readers stay connected with the most important informatics developments in implementation, policy and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信