A New Relevant Integrated Radiologic and Surgical Classification Scheme for Giant Cell Tumors of Bones.

IF 2.1 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Yu-Cherng Chang, Juan Pretell-Mazzini, H Thomas Temple, Roxana Soler, Julian Purrinos, Andrew E Rosenberg, Emily Jonczak, Ty K Subhawong
{"title":"A New Relevant Integrated Radiologic and Surgical Classification Scheme for Giant Cell Tumors of Bones.","authors":"Yu-Cherng Chang, Juan Pretell-Mazzini, H Thomas Temple, Roxana Soler, Julian Purrinos, Andrew E Rosenberg, Emily Jonczak, Ty K Subhawong","doi":"10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-24-00321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Conventional classification systems for giant cell tumors (GCTs) lack robust correlation with management and clinical outcomes. We propose a new radiologic classification system based on surgically relevant features to address this shortcoming.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This IRB-approved single-institution retrospective study involved 35 extremity GCTs from 2013 to 2023 with preoperative radiographs and cross-sectional imaging (MRI and/or CT). An experienced musculoskeletal (MSK) radiologist and orthopaedic oncologist independently assessed tumors according to the Campanacci or new grading system, defined on 1 to 3 scale: (1) intraosseous contained tumor, (2) intraosseous noncontained tumor with extraosseous implant accessible through single incision, and (3) intraosseous noncontained tumor with an extraosseous soft tissue implant nonaccessible from single incision alone. Interrater agreement was determined through the intraclass correlation coefficient. The two-way Friedman test with rater and grading system as factors was used to compare system grading similarity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty patients underwent curettage, five underwent resection; 10 experienced local recurrence. Intraclass correlation coefficients between raters for the Campanacci and novel grading systems were 0.83 and 0.79, respectively. However, compared with the novel system, Campanacci grades were significantly higher by an average of 0.34 ± 0.68 and 0.46 ± 0.70 for the first and second raters, respectively (P = 0.003). None of the patients who underwent resection experienced local recurrence, but in patients who underwent curettage, recurrence rates were higher in Campanacci versus novel grade 1 tumors (29% vs. 17%).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The novel GCT grading system demonstrates excellent interrater agreement, and classified more nonrecurrent curetted tumors as low grade, suggesting improved predictive performance compared with the Campanacci classification.</p>","PeriodicalId":45062,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Global Research and Reviews","volume":"9 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12309912/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Global Research and Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-24-00321","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Conventional classification systems for giant cell tumors (GCTs) lack robust correlation with management and clinical outcomes. We propose a new radiologic classification system based on surgically relevant features to address this shortcoming.

Methods: This IRB-approved single-institution retrospective study involved 35 extremity GCTs from 2013 to 2023 with preoperative radiographs and cross-sectional imaging (MRI and/or CT). An experienced musculoskeletal (MSK) radiologist and orthopaedic oncologist independently assessed tumors according to the Campanacci or new grading system, defined on 1 to 3 scale: (1) intraosseous contained tumor, (2) intraosseous noncontained tumor with extraosseous implant accessible through single incision, and (3) intraosseous noncontained tumor with an extraosseous soft tissue implant nonaccessible from single incision alone. Interrater agreement was determined through the intraclass correlation coefficient. The two-way Friedman test with rater and grading system as factors was used to compare system grading similarity.

Results: Thirty patients underwent curettage, five underwent resection; 10 experienced local recurrence. Intraclass correlation coefficients between raters for the Campanacci and novel grading systems were 0.83 and 0.79, respectively. However, compared with the novel system, Campanacci grades were significantly higher by an average of 0.34 ± 0.68 and 0.46 ± 0.70 for the first and second raters, respectively (P = 0.003). None of the patients who underwent resection experienced local recurrence, but in patients who underwent curettage, recurrence rates were higher in Campanacci versus novel grade 1 tumors (29% vs. 17%).

Discussion: The novel GCT grading system demonstrates excellent interrater agreement, and classified more nonrecurrent curetted tumors as low grade, suggesting improved predictive performance compared with the Campanacci classification.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

一种新的骨巨细胞瘤放射学和外科综合分类方案。
传统的巨细胞肿瘤(gct)分类系统与治疗和临床结果缺乏强有力的相关性。我们提出一种新的基于外科相关特征的放射学分类系统来解决这一缺陷。方法:这项经irb批准的单机构回顾性研究纳入了2013年至2023年的35例四肢gct患者,术前有x线片和横断成像(MRI和/或CT)。一位经验丰富的肌肉骨骼(MSK)放射科医生和骨科肿瘤学家根据Campanacci或新的分级系统独立评估肿瘤,该分级系统定义为1到3级:(1)骨内包含肿瘤,(2)骨外植入物可通过单切口进入的骨内不包含肿瘤,(3)骨内不包含肿瘤,骨外植入物不能通过单切口进入。通过组内相关系数确定组间一致性。采用以评分者和评分制度为因素的双向Friedman检验比较系统评分相似性。结果:刮除30例,切除5例;10例局部复发。Campanacci评分系统与新评分系统的类内相关系数分别为0.83和0.79。但与新系统相比,一、二线系统的Campanacci评分平均分别提高了0.34±0.68和0.46±0.70 (P = 0.003)。接受切除的患者没有出现局部复发,但在接受刮除的患者中,Campanacci的复发率高于新的1级肿瘤(29%对17%)。讨论:新的GCT分级系统显示了出色的一致性,并将更多的非复发切除肿瘤分类为低级别,与Campanacci分级相比,这表明预测性能有所提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
282
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信