Soldiers or Weapons? The Ethical Dilemma and Consequences of the Status for Super Soldier Veterans.

Abstract

The classification of biotechnologically enhanced super soldiers remains a topic of ongoing debate. One proposal suggests categorizing them as unconventional weapons to ensure they are subject to international humanitarian law regulations. This article critically examines the psychological and ethical implications of such a designation, emphasizing the potential long-term consequences for the reintegration of veterans into civilian life. Drawing on insights from psychology, sociology, military studies, and ethics, it analyzes the risks associated with objectification, dehumanization, identity crisis, and moral injury. The findings indicate that treating augmented warfighters as weapons could exacerbate existing challenges in veteran transition, resulting in psychological distress, identity fragmentation, and increased mental health risks. The article argues against the "weaponization" of bioengineered soldiers, advocating instead for their recognition as human beings whose identities are shaped by the embodied realities of their cyborg bioengineering, rather than being viewed as mere instruments of warfare.