Rashad Jabarkheel, Avi A Gajjar, Najib Muhammad, Oliver Y Tang, Samuel B Tomlinson, Josh Golubovsky, Antonio Corral Tarbay, Georgios S Sioutas, Sai Mannam, Alex Vaz, Sonia Ajmera, Sandeep Kandregula, Bryan Pukenas, Omar Choudhri, Brian T Jankowitz, Jan-Karl Burkhardt, Visish M Srinivasan
{"title":"The role of Area Deprivation Index in treatment selection for anterior communicating artery aneurysms.","authors":"Rashad Jabarkheel, Avi A Gajjar, Najib Muhammad, Oliver Y Tang, Samuel B Tomlinson, Josh Golubovsky, Antonio Corral Tarbay, Georgios S Sioutas, Sai Mannam, Alex Vaz, Sonia Ajmera, Sandeep Kandregula, Bryan Pukenas, Omar Choudhri, Brian T Jankowitz, Jan-Karl Burkhardt, Visish M Srinivasan","doi":"10.3171/2025.4.JNS242291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Patient outcomes in medicine vary significantly when stratified by socioeconomic status (SES). In the cerebrovascular area specifically, rates of treatment of intracranial aneurysms (IAs) and overall outcomes after subarachnoid hemorrhage vary significantly by SES. Less is known about the effect of SES on the selection of seemingly equivocal treatment modalities (microsurgery vs endovascular embolization) for IAs. In this study, the authors examined the impact of SES as measured by the Area Deprivation Index (ADI) on selection of the treatment modality for anterior communicating artery (ACoA) aneurysms, which are readily amenable for either microsurgical or endovascular treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted on 136 consecutively treated patients with ACoA aneurysms, unruptured and ruptured, between August 2016 and February 2023 at a large, urban, academic hospital led by dual-trained neurosurgeons. A retrospective review of patient demographics, comorbidities, aneurysm size, morphology, and treatment selection was performed. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis of treatment selection was conducted in the unruptured context, an elective setting, where socioeconomic factors play a strong role in patient-provider shared decision-making, versus the ruptured context, an emergency setting, where the need for expedient intervention diminishes the weight of socioeconomic considerations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Multivariable logistic regression showed that being a patient in the top 50th ADI percentiles was strongly associated with undergoing microsurgical treatment of an ACoA aneurysm in the unruptured context (OR 10.88, 95% CI 1.37-86.59; p = 0.02). Conversely, in the context of ruptured ACoA aneurysms, ADI was not associated with treatment selection (OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.02-1.27; p = 0.08).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ADI significantly impacts treatment selection in the management of unruptured ACoA aneurysms. This study highlights that there might be indirect socioeconomic barriers biasing patients from lower SES backgrounds away from endovascular treatment of unruptured ACoA aneurysms compared with their higher SES counterparts.</p>","PeriodicalId":16505,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2025.4.JNS242291","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Patient outcomes in medicine vary significantly when stratified by socioeconomic status (SES). In the cerebrovascular area specifically, rates of treatment of intracranial aneurysms (IAs) and overall outcomes after subarachnoid hemorrhage vary significantly by SES. Less is known about the effect of SES on the selection of seemingly equivocal treatment modalities (microsurgery vs endovascular embolization) for IAs. In this study, the authors examined the impact of SES as measured by the Area Deprivation Index (ADI) on selection of the treatment modality for anterior communicating artery (ACoA) aneurysms, which are readily amenable for either microsurgical or endovascular treatment.
Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 136 consecutively treated patients with ACoA aneurysms, unruptured and ruptured, between August 2016 and February 2023 at a large, urban, academic hospital led by dual-trained neurosurgeons. A retrospective review of patient demographics, comorbidities, aneurysm size, morphology, and treatment selection was performed. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis of treatment selection was conducted in the unruptured context, an elective setting, where socioeconomic factors play a strong role in patient-provider shared decision-making, versus the ruptured context, an emergency setting, where the need for expedient intervention diminishes the weight of socioeconomic considerations.
Results: Multivariable logistic regression showed that being a patient in the top 50th ADI percentiles was strongly associated with undergoing microsurgical treatment of an ACoA aneurysm in the unruptured context (OR 10.88, 95% CI 1.37-86.59; p = 0.02). Conversely, in the context of ruptured ACoA aneurysms, ADI was not associated with treatment selection (OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.02-1.27; p = 0.08).
Conclusions: ADI significantly impacts treatment selection in the management of unruptured ACoA aneurysms. This study highlights that there might be indirect socioeconomic barriers biasing patients from lower SES backgrounds away from endovascular treatment of unruptured ACoA aneurysms compared with their higher SES counterparts.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics, and Neurosurgical Focus are devoted to the publication of original works relating primarily to neurosurgery, including studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology. The Editors and Editorial Boards encourage submission of clinical and laboratory studies. Other manuscripts accepted for review include technical notes on instruments or equipment that are innovative or useful to clinicians and researchers in the field of neuroscience; papers describing unusual cases; manuscripts on historical persons or events related to neurosurgery; and in Neurosurgical Focus, occasional reviews. Letters to the Editor commenting on articles recently published in the Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, and Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics are welcome.