Ten-Year Outcomes of Hip Arthroscopy for the Treatment of FAI and Labral Tears in Patients with a Workers' Compensation Claim.

IF 4.3 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Benjamin G Domb, Drashti Sikligar, Jessica Keane, Tyler R McCarroll, Ady H Kahana-Rojkind, Roger Quesada-Jimenez
{"title":"Ten-Year Outcomes of Hip Arthroscopy for the Treatment of FAI and Labral Tears in Patients with a Workers' Compensation Claim.","authors":"Benjamin G Domb, Drashti Sikligar, Jessica Keane, Tyler R McCarroll, Ady H Kahana-Rojkind, Roger Quesada-Jimenez","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.24.00996","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Workers' Compensation (WC) status has been associated with inferior outcomes in orthopaedic procedures. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of WC on the long-term outcomes of patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and labral tears and to compare these findings with those of a propensity-matched control group.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted that included patients with a WC claim who underwent hip arthroscopy for FAI and labral tears between 2008 and 2013. Included patients had complete preoperative and minimum 10-year postoperative questionnaires for patient-reported outcomes (PROs) or a documented end point. Patients were propensity-matched to a control group without a WC claim in a 1:3 ratio on the basis of age at the time of surgery, sex, body mass index, acetabular Outerbridge grade, and capsular treatment. Clinically meaningful thresholds, complications, survivorship, work type, and return-to-work rates were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 280 patients (WC group, 70; control group, 210) were included in the study. The WC group had a mean follow-up time of 123.9 ± 22.6 months. Compared with the matched control group, the WC group had worse preoperative PRO scores but a greater magnitude of improvement. The groups had similar (p > 0.05) rates of reaching the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) values for the modified Harris hip score (MCID: 93.0% [WC group], 79.2% [control group]; PASS: 83.7% [WC], 77.8% [control]), the Non-Arthritic Hip Score (MCID: 90.7% [WC], 77.8% [control]; PASS: 74.4% [WC], 63.2% [control]), and the Hip Outcome Score Sport-Specific Subscale (MCID: 87.5% [WC], 72.3% [control]; PASS: 72.7% [WC], 55.6% [control]). In the WC group, 82.9% of patients returned to work, with a mean time to return to work of 8.0 ± 7.4 months. The WC group had a higher rate of revision hip arthroscopy than the control group, with a threefold relative risk (95% confidence interval, 1.6 to 5.7; p < 0.001) and a mean time to revision of 28.3 ± 37.1 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Hip arthroscopy for the treatment of FAI and labral tears in patients with a WC claim was associated with favorable outcomes and a high return-to-work rate at a minimum 10-year follow-up. These results were comparable with those of a benchmark control group. However, the WC group had a significantly higher rate of revision hip arthroscopy than the control group.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":15273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.24.00996","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Workers' Compensation (WC) status has been associated with inferior outcomes in orthopaedic procedures. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of WC on the long-term outcomes of patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and labral tears and to compare these findings with those of a propensity-matched control group.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted that included patients with a WC claim who underwent hip arthroscopy for FAI and labral tears between 2008 and 2013. Included patients had complete preoperative and minimum 10-year postoperative questionnaires for patient-reported outcomes (PROs) or a documented end point. Patients were propensity-matched to a control group without a WC claim in a 1:3 ratio on the basis of age at the time of surgery, sex, body mass index, acetabular Outerbridge grade, and capsular treatment. Clinically meaningful thresholds, complications, survivorship, work type, and return-to-work rates were analyzed.

Results: A total of 280 patients (WC group, 70; control group, 210) were included in the study. The WC group had a mean follow-up time of 123.9 ± 22.6 months. Compared with the matched control group, the WC group had worse preoperative PRO scores but a greater magnitude of improvement. The groups had similar (p > 0.05) rates of reaching the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) values for the modified Harris hip score (MCID: 93.0% [WC group], 79.2% [control group]; PASS: 83.7% [WC], 77.8% [control]), the Non-Arthritic Hip Score (MCID: 90.7% [WC], 77.8% [control]; PASS: 74.4% [WC], 63.2% [control]), and the Hip Outcome Score Sport-Specific Subscale (MCID: 87.5% [WC], 72.3% [control]; PASS: 72.7% [WC], 55.6% [control]). In the WC group, 82.9% of patients returned to work, with a mean time to return to work of 8.0 ± 7.4 months. The WC group had a higher rate of revision hip arthroscopy than the control group, with a threefold relative risk (95% confidence interval, 1.6 to 5.7; p < 0.001) and a mean time to revision of 28.3 ± 37.1 months.

Conclusions: Hip arthroscopy for the treatment of FAI and labral tears in patients with a WC claim was associated with favorable outcomes and a high return-to-work rate at a minimum 10-year follow-up. These results were comparable with those of a benchmark control group. However, the WC group had a significantly higher rate of revision hip arthroscopy than the control group.

Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

髋关节镜治疗FAI和劳动赔偿索赔患者唇裂的十年结果。
背景:工人补偿(WC)状态与骨科手术的不良结果有关。本研究的目的是确定WC对因股髋臼撞击(FAI)和唇部撕裂而接受髋关节镜检查的患者的长期预后的影响,并将这些结果与倾向匹配的对照组进行比较。方法:回顾性分析2008年至2013年期间因FAI和唇部撕裂接受髋关节镜检查的WC患者。纳入的患者有完整的术前和术后至少10年的患者报告结果问卷(PROs)或记录的终点。根据手术时的年龄、性别、体重指数、髋臼外桥分级和囊膜治疗情况,将患者与无WC声明的对照组按1:3的比例进行倾向匹配。分析临床意义阈值、并发症、生存率、工作类型和复工率。结果:共280例患者(WC组70例;对照组210例。WC组平均随访123.9±22.6个月。与匹配的对照组相比,WC组术前PRO评分较差,但改善幅度较大。两组改良Harris髋关节评分达到最小临床重要差异(MCID)和患者可接受症状状态(PASS)值的比例相似(p > 0.05) (MCID: 93.0% [WC组],79.2%[对照组];PASS: 83.7% [WC], 77.8%[对照组]),非关节炎髋关节评分(MCID: 90.7% [WC], 77.8%[对照组];PASS: 74.4% [WC], 63.2%[对照组]),髋关节结局评分运动特异性亚量表(MCID: 87.5% [WC], 72.3%[对照组];合格率:72.7%[对照组],55.6%[对照组])。WC组82.9%的患者恢复工作,平均恢复工作时间为8.0±7.4个月。WC组髋关节镜翻修率高于对照组,相对危险度为3倍(95%可信区间,1.6 ~ 5.7;P < 0.001),平均修复时间28.3±37.1个月。结论:在至少10年的随访中,髋关节镜治疗WC索赔患者的FAI和唇裂具有良好的预后和高的重返工作率。这些结果与基准对照组的结果相当。然而,WC组髋关节镜翻修率明显高于对照组。证据等级:治疗性III级。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参见作者说明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
7.50%
发文量
660
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (JBJS) has been the most valued source of information for orthopaedic surgeons and researchers for over 125 years and is the gold standard in peer-reviewed scientific information in the field. A core journal and essential reading for general as well as specialist orthopaedic surgeons worldwide, The Journal publishes evidence-based research to enhance the quality of care for orthopaedic patients. Standards of excellence and high quality are maintained in everything we do, from the science of the content published to the customer service we provide. JBJS is an independent, non-profit journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信