Benjamin G Domb, Drashti Sikligar, Jessica Keane, Tyler R McCarroll, Ady H Kahana-Rojkind, Roger Quesada-Jimenez
{"title":"Ten-Year Outcomes of Hip Arthroscopy for the Treatment of FAI and Labral Tears in Patients with a Workers' Compensation Claim.","authors":"Benjamin G Domb, Drashti Sikligar, Jessica Keane, Tyler R McCarroll, Ady H Kahana-Rojkind, Roger Quesada-Jimenez","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.24.00996","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Workers' Compensation (WC) status has been associated with inferior outcomes in orthopaedic procedures. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of WC on the long-term outcomes of patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and labral tears and to compare these findings with those of a propensity-matched control group.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted that included patients with a WC claim who underwent hip arthroscopy for FAI and labral tears between 2008 and 2013. Included patients had complete preoperative and minimum 10-year postoperative questionnaires for patient-reported outcomes (PROs) or a documented end point. Patients were propensity-matched to a control group without a WC claim in a 1:3 ratio on the basis of age at the time of surgery, sex, body mass index, acetabular Outerbridge grade, and capsular treatment. Clinically meaningful thresholds, complications, survivorship, work type, and return-to-work rates were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 280 patients (WC group, 70; control group, 210) were included in the study. The WC group had a mean follow-up time of 123.9 ± 22.6 months. Compared with the matched control group, the WC group had worse preoperative PRO scores but a greater magnitude of improvement. The groups had similar (p > 0.05) rates of reaching the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) values for the modified Harris hip score (MCID: 93.0% [WC group], 79.2% [control group]; PASS: 83.7% [WC], 77.8% [control]), the Non-Arthritic Hip Score (MCID: 90.7% [WC], 77.8% [control]; PASS: 74.4% [WC], 63.2% [control]), and the Hip Outcome Score Sport-Specific Subscale (MCID: 87.5% [WC], 72.3% [control]; PASS: 72.7% [WC], 55.6% [control]). In the WC group, 82.9% of patients returned to work, with a mean time to return to work of 8.0 ± 7.4 months. The WC group had a higher rate of revision hip arthroscopy than the control group, with a threefold relative risk (95% confidence interval, 1.6 to 5.7; p < 0.001) and a mean time to revision of 28.3 ± 37.1 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Hip arthroscopy for the treatment of FAI and labral tears in patients with a WC claim was associated with favorable outcomes and a high return-to-work rate at a minimum 10-year follow-up. These results were comparable with those of a benchmark control group. However, the WC group had a significantly higher rate of revision hip arthroscopy than the control group.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":15273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.24.00996","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Workers' Compensation (WC) status has been associated with inferior outcomes in orthopaedic procedures. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of WC on the long-term outcomes of patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and labral tears and to compare these findings with those of a propensity-matched control group.
Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted that included patients with a WC claim who underwent hip arthroscopy for FAI and labral tears between 2008 and 2013. Included patients had complete preoperative and minimum 10-year postoperative questionnaires for patient-reported outcomes (PROs) or a documented end point. Patients were propensity-matched to a control group without a WC claim in a 1:3 ratio on the basis of age at the time of surgery, sex, body mass index, acetabular Outerbridge grade, and capsular treatment. Clinically meaningful thresholds, complications, survivorship, work type, and return-to-work rates were analyzed.
Results: A total of 280 patients (WC group, 70; control group, 210) were included in the study. The WC group had a mean follow-up time of 123.9 ± 22.6 months. Compared with the matched control group, the WC group had worse preoperative PRO scores but a greater magnitude of improvement. The groups had similar (p > 0.05) rates of reaching the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) values for the modified Harris hip score (MCID: 93.0% [WC group], 79.2% [control group]; PASS: 83.7% [WC], 77.8% [control]), the Non-Arthritic Hip Score (MCID: 90.7% [WC], 77.8% [control]; PASS: 74.4% [WC], 63.2% [control]), and the Hip Outcome Score Sport-Specific Subscale (MCID: 87.5% [WC], 72.3% [control]; PASS: 72.7% [WC], 55.6% [control]). In the WC group, 82.9% of patients returned to work, with a mean time to return to work of 8.0 ± 7.4 months. The WC group had a higher rate of revision hip arthroscopy than the control group, with a threefold relative risk (95% confidence interval, 1.6 to 5.7; p < 0.001) and a mean time to revision of 28.3 ± 37.1 months.
Conclusions: Hip arthroscopy for the treatment of FAI and labral tears in patients with a WC claim was associated with favorable outcomes and a high return-to-work rate at a minimum 10-year follow-up. These results were comparable with those of a benchmark control group. However, the WC group had a significantly higher rate of revision hip arthroscopy than the control group.
Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (JBJS) has been the most valued source of information for orthopaedic surgeons and researchers for over 125 years and is the gold standard in peer-reviewed scientific information in the field. A core journal and essential reading for general as well as specialist orthopaedic surgeons worldwide, The Journal publishes evidence-based research to enhance the quality of care for orthopaedic patients. Standards of excellence and high quality are maintained in everything we do, from the science of the content published to the customer service we provide. JBJS is an independent, non-profit journal.