Zugangswege zur Talusfraktur – Kann der ventrale Zugang bilaterale Zugänge ersetzen?

Q4 Medicine
Dominik Adl Amini , Frank Graef , Tobias Gehlen
{"title":"Zugangswege zur Talusfraktur – Kann der ventrale Zugang bilaterale Zugänge ersetzen?","authors":"Dominik Adl Amini ,&nbsp;Frank Graef ,&nbsp;Tobias Gehlen","doi":"10.1016/j.fuspru.2025.05.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Talus fractures are among the most complex injuries in the lower extremity. Overall, they are a rare injury and account for only approx. 0.3–0.5% of all fractures and approx. 3–4% of fractures of the foot. They mainly affect young adults (third decade of life) in a ratio of 3:1 between men and women. Due to the specific anatomical, biomechanical and vascular characteristics of the talus, surgical treatment is challenging. The correct choice of the surgical approach is crucial in order to achieve anatomical reduction of the fracture and good long term function.</div><div>Traditionally, bilateral approaches are used for complex talus fractures, exposing both the the medial and lateral side of the talus. Establishing the ventral approach allows direct visualization of the caput and the colum ventrally. However, the question arises as to whether this method can represent a less invasive invasive alternative to the traditional bilateral approaches.</div><div>In summary, the evidence suggests that the ventral approach may be a useful alternative to bilateral approaches for certain indications, particularly isolated fractures of the talar neck. However, bilateral approaches remain the gold standard for complex, multidirectional fractures. The choice of the surgical approaxch should nevertheless always be individually based on fracture complexity, patient characteristics and surgical expertise.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":39776,"journal":{"name":"Fuss und Sprunggelenk","volume":"23 2","pages":"Pages 85-92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fuss und Sprunggelenk","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S161999872500056X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Talus fractures are among the most complex injuries in the lower extremity. Overall, they are a rare injury and account for only approx. 0.3–0.5% of all fractures and approx. 3–4% of fractures of the foot. They mainly affect young adults (third decade of life) in a ratio of 3:1 between men and women. Due to the specific anatomical, biomechanical and vascular characteristics of the talus, surgical treatment is challenging. The correct choice of the surgical approach is crucial in order to achieve anatomical reduction of the fracture and good long term function.
Traditionally, bilateral approaches are used for complex talus fractures, exposing both the the medial and lateral side of the talus. Establishing the ventral approach allows direct visualization of the caput and the colum ventrally. However, the question arises as to whether this method can represent a less invasive invasive alternative to the traditional bilateral approaches.
In summary, the evidence suggests that the ventral approach may be a useful alternative to bilateral approaches for certain indications, particularly isolated fractures of the talar neck. However, bilateral approaches remain the gold standard for complex, multidirectional fractures. The choice of the surgical approaxch should nevertheless always be individually based on fracture complexity, patient characteristics and surgical expertise.
骨盆骨折通路-腹侧通路能取代双侧通路吗?
距骨骨折是下肢最复杂的损伤之一。总的来说,它们是一种罕见的伤害,只占大约。约占所有骨折的0.3-0.5%。3-4%的足部骨折。它们主要影响年轻人(生命的第三个十年),男女比例为3:1。由于距骨特殊的解剖、生物力学和血管特征,手术治疗具有挑战性。正确选择手术入路对于实现骨折的解剖复位和良好的远期功能至关重要。传统上,双侧入路用于复杂距骨骨折,暴露距骨内侧和外侧。建立腹侧入路可以直接看到腹侧的颅底和脊柱。然而,问题是这种方法是否可以替代传统的双侧入路。总之,有证据表明腹侧入路对于某些适应症,特别是离骨颈孤立骨折,可能是双侧入路的有效替代方法。然而,双侧入路仍然是治疗复杂多向骨折的黄金标准。然而,手术入路的选择应根据骨折的复杂性、患者特征和外科专业知识而定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Fuss und Sprunggelenk
Fuss und Sprunggelenk Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
105
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Offizielles Organ der Deutschen Assoziation fur Fuß & Sprunggelenk e. V. (D. A. F.)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信