{"title":"Established but unused? An empirical study on the impact of health records on the utilization of basic public health services in China","authors":"Xiafei Tao , Si Shi , Junqiang Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Health records are crucial for implementing basic public health services (BPHSs) in China, yet their utilization rate lags behind the coverage rate. This study aimed to provide insights into the underutilization issue by exploring whether health records facilitate the utilization of other BPHSs.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted empirical analyses to examine the impact of health records on the utilization of two specific BPHSs: health education and health management services for patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Multiple linear regression and binary logistic models were employed in the analyses. Additionally, we used the propensity score matching approach to address potential biases.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Health records significantly enhanced the diversity of health education attended by residents, fostered active engagement in health education, and facilitated the utilization of corresponding health management services for patients with hypertension and T2DM.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Despite widespread skepticism concerning the utilization rate of health records, our findings provided empirical evidence that health records may benefit citizens’ self-health management and the utilization of other BPHSs. However, the specific mechanism of this impact needs to be further investigated. This study offers insights into the evaluation of public health programs in the Chinese context and highlights their implications for promoting health equity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48046,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation and Program Planning","volume":"112 ","pages":"Article 102654"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluation and Program Planning","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718925001211","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
Health records are crucial for implementing basic public health services (BPHSs) in China, yet their utilization rate lags behind the coverage rate. This study aimed to provide insights into the underutilization issue by exploring whether health records facilitate the utilization of other BPHSs.
Methods
We conducted empirical analyses to examine the impact of health records on the utilization of two specific BPHSs: health education and health management services for patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Multiple linear regression and binary logistic models were employed in the analyses. Additionally, we used the propensity score matching approach to address potential biases.
Results
Health records significantly enhanced the diversity of health education attended by residents, fostered active engagement in health education, and facilitated the utilization of corresponding health management services for patients with hypertension and T2DM.
Conclusions
Despite widespread skepticism concerning the utilization rate of health records, our findings provided empirical evidence that health records may benefit citizens’ self-health management and the utilization of other BPHSs. However, the specific mechanism of this impact needs to be further investigated. This study offers insights into the evaluation of public health programs in the Chinese context and highlights their implications for promoting health equity.
期刊介绍:
Evaluation and Program Planning is based on the principle that the techniques and methods of evaluation and planning transcend the boundaries of specific fields and that relevant contributions to these areas come from people representing many different positions, intellectual traditions, and interests. In order to further the development of evaluation and planning, we publish articles from the private and public sectors in a wide range of areas: organizational development and behavior, training, planning, human resource development, health and mental, social services, mental retardation, corrections, substance abuse, and education.